-
Smith v Attorney-General
[2022] NZHC 1693
Citation 1
…t [80]. 69 At [199]–[200], citing Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4, [2018] AC 736; and N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25, [2019] 2 WLR 1478. 70 At [270]–[274]. 71 Smith v Fonterra Co-Operative Group Ltd [2020] NZHC 419, [2020] 2 NZLR 394 [ Smith v Fonterra (HC)]; and Smith…
-
A v Attorney-General
[2020] NZHC 3401
Citation 2
…Brief Publishing, Somerset, 2019) at 44. 22 Attorney-General v Strathboss Kiwifruit Ltd , above n 4, at [199]-[200], citing N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25, [2019] 2 WLR 1478; and Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4, [2018] AC 736 at [34], citing Stelios Tofaris and Sandy St…
-
Tindall and another (Appellants) v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police (Respondent)
[2024] UKSC 33
Citation 3
…This summary has since been cited again by this court in N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25; [2020] AC 780, para 76, and HXA v Surrey County Council [2023] UKSC 52; [2024] 1 WLR 335, para 88, and by the Privy Council in Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) plc v RAV Bahamas Ltd [2024] UKPC 11, para 21. Although thi…
-
HXA (Respondent) v Surrey County Council (Appellant) (UKSC 2022/0149)
[2023] UKSC 52
Citation 4
…d and clarified by this court, in the context of alleged failures by a local authority’s social services department, in N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25, [2020] AC 780 (“ N v Poole ”). The decisions in these cases turn on the application of the decision and reasoning in that leading case.…
-
HXA v Surrey County Council
[2023] UKSC 52
Citation 5
…lored and clarified by this court, in the context of alleged failures by a local authority's social services department, in N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25, [2020] AC 780 (" N v Poole "). The decisions in these cases turn on the application of the decision and reasoning in that leading case. The defendan…
-
Paul & Anor v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
[2024] UKSC 1
Citation 6
…ral common law rule is that there is no duty of care owed in respect of a failure to benefit a claimant. See, generally, N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25; [2020] AC 780. In a standard medical negligence context, where the claim for personal injury is brought by the patient, there is no difficulty in inclu…
-
Tindall & Anor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police
[2024] UKSC 33
Citation 7
…A's status creates an obligation to protect B from that danger." This summary has since been cited again by this court in N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25; [2020] AC 780, para 76, and HXA v Surrey County Council [2023] UKSC 52; [2024] 1 WLR 335, para 88, and by the Privy Council in Great Lakes Reinsuranc…
-
Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) plc (as Subrogee of Modrono's Bimini Place Ltd) v RAV Bahamas Ltd (Bahamas)
[2024] UKPC 11
Citation 8
…le of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4, [2018] AC 736 (although that was not itself a failure to confer a benefit case), N v Poole Borough Council [2019] UKSC 25, [2020] AC 780, and HXA v Surrey County Council [2023] UKSC 52, [2024] 1 WLR 335. To establish liability for a failure to confer a benefit, which is…
-
Royal Bank of Scotland International Ltd v JP SPC 4 & Anor (Isle of Man)
[2022] UKPC 18
Citation 9
…e para 9). In the present case the relevant facts as to whether in law the Bank owed a duty of care to the Fund can be readily identified, namely, the assumed facts. It follows that the lower courts were correct to “grasp the nettle” and to decide the question of law, as to whether there was the alleged duty of c…