R (on the application of Imam) (Respondent) v London Borough of Croydon (Appellant)
[2023] UKSC 45
Citation 1
…the claims of the multitude who are not before the court against the claims of the few who are” (see R (Ahmad) v Newham London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 14; [2009] PTSR 632 – “ Ahmad ” – para 15, per Baroness Hale). It was significant that Ms Imam could not show that her situation had reached the level of seri…
Birmingham City Council v Ali & Ors
[2009] UKHL 36
Citation 2
…housing authority’s allocation policy, unless it breached the requirements of Part 6. Provided that “reasonable preference” is given to all those who are homeless within the meaning of Part 7, there is no reason why an authority should not decide to give some homeless groups priority over others, as long as the…
Imam, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Croydon
[2023] UKSC 45
Citation 3
…the claims of the multitude who are not before the court against the claims of the few who are” (see R (Ahmad) v Newham London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 14; [2009] PTSR 632 - “ Ahmad ” - para 15, per Baroness Hale). It was significant that Ms Imam could not show that her situation had reached the level of seri…
Z & Anor, R (on the application of) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor (Rev 1)
[2020] UKSC 40
Citation 4
…83. The House of Lords in R (Ahmad) v Newham London Borough Council [2009] UKHL 14; [2009] PTSR 632 considered a broadly analogous context when assessing whether a local housing authority’s scheme made under section 167(2) of the Housing Act 1996 (as amended) for determining priority for allocation of social hous…