Lord Steyn Lord Hope of Craighead
(ORIGINAL APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT),
EX PARTE V.
(ORIGINAL RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT
REGINA
(ORIGINAL APPELLANT AND CROSS-REPONDENT),
EX PARTE T.
(ORIGINAL RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT
(CONJOINED APPEALS)
LORD GOFF OF CHIEVELEY
My Lords,
The Sentence of the Judge
On 24 November 1993 two young boys, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, were convicted of the murder of a two year old boy, James Bulger. The murder had taken place on 12 February 1993, when Thompson and Venables were 10½ years old. Since a child under 10 cannot be guilty of a criminal offence in English law, they were only just over the age of criminal responsibility. They were 11 years old at the time of their trial, which took place before Morland J. and a jury. After conviction, the judge sentenced each of them to be detained during Her Majesty's pleasure, such a sentence being mandatory in the case of young offenders convicted of murder: see section 53(1) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933.
Before sentencing them, the judge said:
-
"Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, the killing of James Bulger was an act of unparalleled evil and barbarity.
-
"This child of 2 was taken from his mother on a journey of over two miles and then, on the railway line, was battered to death without mercy and then his body was placed across the railway line so that his body would be run over by a train in an attempt to conceal his murder. In my judgment, your conduct was both cunning and very wicked.
-
"The sentence that I pass upon you both . . . is that you shall be detained during Her Majesty's pleasure in such a place and under such conditions as the Secretary of State may direct and that means that you will be securely detained for very, very many years until the Home Secretary is satisfied that you have matured and are fully rehabilitated and are no longer a danger to others."
After sentencing them the judge continued, in their absence:
-
"How it came about that two mentally normal boys aged 10 of average intelligence committed this terrible crime is very hard to comprehend . . ."
The Judge's Report to the Home Secretary
On 29 November 1993 the judge completed a Report on a standard form headed: "Mandatory Life Sentence Case. Trial Judge's Report to the Home Secretary." In section 5 of the Report the judge provided, as required, a description of the offence and the circumstances in which it was committed, together with his assessment of the relative culpability of the two defendants, which was that he was unable to determine their relative culpability. In section 10 he gave, again as required,…
Continue reading Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Venables...
Sign in free to access the full text
- Case
- [1997] UKHL 25
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.