Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Venables and Thompson, R v.

Case [1997] UKHL 25


HOUSE OF LORDS

  Lord Goff of Chieveley   Lord Browne- Wilkinson   Lord Lloyd of Berwick
  Lord Steyn   Lord Hope of Craighead

OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGEMENT IN THE CAUSE

REGINA

v.

SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
(ORIGINAL APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT),

EX PARTE V.
(ORIGINAL RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT

REGINA


v.


SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
(ORIGINAL APPELLANT AND CROSS-REPONDENT),
EX PARTE T.
(ORIGINAL RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT
(CONJOINED APPEALS)


ON 12 JUNE 1997



LORD GOFF OF CHIEVELEY


My Lords,

The Sentence of the Judge

      On 24 November 1993 two young boys, Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, were convicted of the murder of a two year old boy, James Bulger. The murder had taken place on 12 February 1993, when Thompson and Venables were 10½ years old. Since a child under 10 cannot be guilty of a criminal offence in English law, they were only just over the age of criminal responsibility. They were 11 years old at the time of their trial, which took place before Morland J. and a jury. After conviction, the judge sentenced each of them to be detained during Her Majesty's pleasure, such a sentence being mandatory in the case of young offenders convicted of murder: see section 53(1) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933.

      Before sentencing them, the judge said:

      "Robert Thompson and Jon Venables, the killing of James Bulger was an act of unparalleled evil and barbarity.

     "This child of 2 was taken from his mother on a journey of over two miles and then, on the railway line, was battered to death without mercy and then his body was placed across the railway line so that his body would be run over by a train in an attempt to conceal his murder. In my judgment, your conduct was both cunning and very wicked.

     "The sentence that I pass upon you both . . . is that you shall be detained during Her Majesty's pleasure in such a place and under such conditions as the Secretary of State may direct and that means that you will be securely detained for very, very many years until the Home Secretary is satisfied that you have matured and are fully rehabilitated and are no longer a danger to others."

After sentencing them the judge continued, in their absence:

      "How it came about that two mentally normal boys aged 10 of average intelligence committed this terrible crime is very hard to comprehend . . ."

The Judge's Report to the Home Secretary

      On 29 November 1993 the judge completed a Report on a standard form headed: "Mandatory Life Sentence Case. Trial Judge's Report to the Home Secretary." In section 5 of the Report the judge provided, as required, a description of the offence and the circumstances in which it was committed, together with his assessment of the relative culpability of the two defendants, which was that he was unable to determine their relative culpability. In section 10 he gave, again as required,…

Continue reading Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Venables...

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
Case
[1997] UKHL 25
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.