Pahau v R

Case [2011] NZCA 147


IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND
CA540/2010
CA569/2010
CA588/2010
CA590/2010
[2011] NZCA 147

BETWEEN  MATIU JOSEPH PAORA PAHAU
RANGI RICK BROWN
MAHANA MAKARINI EDMONDS
ADRIAN TONY FENTON
Appellants

AND  THE QUEEN
Respondent

Hearing:         7 March 2011

Court:             Ellen France, Courtney and Clifford JJ

Counsel:         S W Hughes QC for Appellant Pahau
J B M Henderson for Appellant Brown
A R H Laurenson and H A Froude for Appellant Edmonds
J C Hannam for Appellant Fenton
J C Pike and M J Inwood for Respondent

Judgment:      11 April 2011 at 2.30 pm

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

The appeals by all appellants against conviction and sentence are dismissed.

REASONS OF THE COURT
(Given by Ellen France J)

Table of Contents

Para No.

Introduction  [1]
Factual background  [8]
The decision not to give a reliability warning  [18]
Mr Murray’s evidence  [20]
Discussion  [22]
Conviction appeals – Messrs Edmonds, Brown and Fenton  [46]
Mr Pahau’s sentence appeal  [62]
The approach taken by the Judge  [63]
Discussion  [67]
Mr Edmonds’ sentence appeal  [78]
Mr Fenton’s sentence appeal  [81]
Mr Brown’s sentence appeal  [91]
Postcript on the manslaughter sentences  [96]
Disposition  [99]

Introduction

  1. Peri Niwa died on 15 November 2008 in New Plymouth as a result of a stab wound inflicted by Matiu Pahau.  His death occurred after he and his associates were pursued by Mr Pahau and the other appellants, all of whom were patched members of the Taranaki Black Power gang.

  2. All of the appellants were charged with the murder of Mr Niwa.  Their liability depended on the application of s 66(2) of the Crimes Act 1961.  They were also all charged with participation in an organised criminal group and with the commission of a crime with a firearm.  After trial, Mr Pahau was convicted of murder and the other appellants of manslaughter.  Messrs Pahau, Edmonds and Brown pleaded guilty in relation to participation in an organised criminal group with the specific purpose of inflicting serious violence and Mr Fenton was convicted of that offence at trial.  All were convicted in relation to the commission of a crime with a firearm.

  3. Mr Pahau was sentenced by the trial Judge, Asher J, to life imprisonment with a minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) of 17 years.  Mr Edmonds was sentenced to 14 and a half years imprisonment with an MPI of nine years.  Both Messrs Brown and Fenton were sentenced to 11 years imprisonment with MPIs of five and a half years.

  4. Mr Pahau appeals against his conviction for murder and against sentence.  The other appellants appeal against their manslaughter convictions and against sentence. 

  5. Mr Pahau’s conviction appeal raises an issue about Asher J’s decision[1] not to give a warning about the need for care in assessing the reliability of the evidence of Ricky Murray.[2]  Mr Murray was a fellow Black Power member.  He was initially charged along with the appellants but the charges against him were dropped just prior to depositions when he agreed to testify against the others. 

    [1]       Under s…

Continue reading Pahau v R

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Pahau v R [2011] NZCA 147
Case
[2011] NZCA 147
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellants appealed against their convictions and sentences. The first appellant, Mr Pahau, appealed against his conviction of murder and his sentence of life imprisonment with a minimum period of imprisonment (MPI) of 17 years. The other appellants appealed against their convictions of manslaughter and their sentences. The Court found that Mr Pahau’s appeal against his conviction of murder had no prospect of success and dismissed it. The Court also dismissed the appeal of the other appellants against their convictions of manslaughter. The Court found that the sentence imposed on Mr Pahau was not manifestly unjust and dismissed his appeal against sentence. The Court also dismissed the sentence appeals of the other appellants. The Court held that the sentences imposed on the other appellants were within the available range and dismissed their appeals against sentence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.