SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
Case Title: | ZA v Director-General, Community Services Directorate |
Citation: | [2021] ACTSC 243 |
Hearing Dates: | 2, 6, and 9 August 2021 |
DecisionDate: | 9 August 2021 |
ReasonsDate: | 24 September 2021 |
Before: | Loukas-Karlsson J |
Decision: | See [599] |
Catchwords: | APPEAL – care and protection proceedings – revocation application – leave to appeal out of time – litigant in person |
Legislation Cited: | Children and Young People Act 2008 (ACT) pt 13.1, ss 342, 343, 344, 345, 436, 439, 464, 467, 472, 711, 836, and 838 Court Procedure Rules 2006 (ACT) rr 1203, 1613, 5052, 5101, 6830 Supreme Court Act 1933 (ACT) ss 37N and 37O |
Cases Cited: | CAL15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1344 Carlson v The King (1947) 64 WN (NSW) 65 |
Parties: | ZA (Appellant) Director-General, Community Services Directorate (First Respondent) Children’s Representative (Second Respondent) |
Representation: | Counsel Self-represented (Appellant) K Musgrove (First Respondent) J Banwell (Second Respondent) |
| Solicitors Self-represented (Appellant) ACT Government Solicitor (First Respondent) Legal Aid ACT (Second Respondent) | |
File Number: | SCA 52 of 2020 |
Decision under appeal: | Court: ACT Childrens Court Before: Chief Magistrate Walker Date of Decision: 11 November 2020 Case Title: Director-General, Community Services Directorate v [AA]; Director-General, Community Services Directorate v [RA] Court File Numbers: KE 3122; KE 3123 |
| Decision where leave is sought to appeal out of time: | Court: ACT Childrens Court |
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read ZA v Director-General, Community Services Directorate and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] ACTSC 243
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether ZA had made out a sufficient case to warrant leave to appeal out of time, and whether the appeal had a reasonable prospect of success. The court had to consider the principles and factors relevant to granting leave to appeal out of time, as well as the merits of the appeal itself. The court had to balance the need for finality in legal proceedings against the potential injustice of denying an appeal where there are exceptional circumstances.
The court found that ZA had made out a sufficient case to warrant leave to appeal out of time, as there were exceptional circumstances that justified the delay in filing the appeal. The court found that ZA had acted reasonably and diligently in pursuing the appeal, and that the delay in filing the appeal was due to factors beyond his control. The court also found that the appeal had a reasonable prospect of success, as there were significant errors in the decision to revoke the care and protection order. The court found that the decision-maker had failed to properly consider relevant evidence and had misapplied the relevant legal principles.
The final orders of the court were that ZA be granted leave to appeal out of time, and that the appeal be allowed. The care and protection order was reinstated, and the Director-General was ordered to take certain steps to ensure that the child's welfare was properly protected. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring that children in care and protection proceedings receive appropriate legal representation, and noted that ZA's status as a litigant in person did not detract from the merits of his appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [599]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.