| IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA | Not Restricted |
AT MELBOURNE
COMMON LAW DIVISION
MAJOR TORTS LIST
S CI 2016 01170
| PETER NICHOLAS YUNGHANNS | Plaintiff |
| v | |
| NICHOLAS COLQUHOUN-DENVERS | Defendant |
---
JUDGE: | T FORREST JA |
WHERE HELD: | Melbourne |
DATES OF HEARING: | 30 April, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 May, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 August 2018 |
DATE OF JUDGMENT: | 28 June 2019 |
CASE MAY BE CITED AS: | Yunghanns v Colquhoun-Denvers |
MEDIUM NEUTRAL CITATION: | [2019] VSC 433 |
---
DEFAMATION – Claim – Two emails in November and December 2015 alleged to be defamatory – Imputations – Defendant concede defamatory nature of imputations – Common law truth – Statutory defence of justification – Whether accusations not genuine, authentic or truthful – Plaintiff did not act dishonestly – Qualified privilege made out – Qualified privilege not defeated by malice – Defamation Act 2005 ss 25, 30.
DEFAMATION – Counterclaim – Three emails between November 2015 and May 2016 alleged to be defamatory – Plaintiff denied defamatory nature of imputations – Common law defence of truth established – Statutory defence of justification made out – Defamation Act 2005 s 25.
---
APPEARANCES: | Counsel | Solicitors |
| For the Plaintiff | Mr W Houghton QC with Mr B Holmes | Strongman & Crouch |
| For the Defendant | Mr B McClintock SC with Dr S Baron Levi and Ms J Alderson | Batten Sacks |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1... Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 The impugned emails............................................................................................................ 3
2 .. Legal Principles....................................................................................................................... 13
2.1 Defamation............................................................................................................................. 13
2.2 Defences.................................................................................................................................. 15
2.2.1... Common law truth................................................................................................ 15
2.2.2... Statutory justification............................................................................................ 15
2.2.3... Common law qualified privilege........................................................................ 16
2.2.4... Statutory qualified privilege............................................................................... 17
2.2.5... Malice...................................................................................................................... 19
3 .. Background.............................................................................................................................. 20
4... The Claim................................................................................................................................... 32
4.1 Publication............................................................................................................................. 32
4.2 Imputations............................................................................................................................ 35
4.2.1 The 3 November email............................................................................................ 35
4.2.2 The 30 December email........................................................................................... 37
4.2.3 The imputations are defamatory............................................................................ 39
5... Defence of Truth/Justification.......................................................................................... 39
5.1 Witnesses................................................................................................................................ 42
5.2 Dishonesty.............................................................................................................................. 43
5.3 FIP by-laws accusations....................................................................................................... 44
5.4 Bank accounts........................................................................................................................ 55
5.4.1 PY................................................................................................................................ 62
5.4.2 AJ................................................................................................................................. 63
5.4.3 NC-D........................................................................................................................... 64
5.4.4 RC................................................................................................................................ 65
5.4.5 AT................................................................................................................................ 65
5.4.6 Analysis...................................................................................................................... 67
5.4.7 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 74
5.5 The Taylor Report................................................................................................................. 74
5.5.1 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 80
5.6 Failure to elect B and C country members and fake entries on the website................ 80
5.6.1 PY................................................................................................................................ 85
5.6.2 NC-D........................................................................................................................... 85
5.6.3 Analysis and conclusion.......................................................................................... 86
5.7 Super Nations Tournament................................................................................................. 88
5.7.1 PY................................................................................................................................ 92
5.7.2 NC-D........................................................................................................................... 93
5.7.3 RC................................................................................................................................ 93
5.7.4 Conclusion................................................................................................................. 93
5.8 CEO......................................................................................................................................... 94
5.8.1 PY.............................................................................................................................. 100
5.8.2 NC-D......................................................................................................................... 100
5.8.3 RC.............................................................................................................................. 101
5.8.4 AT.............................................................................................................................. 101
5.8.5 Analysis and conclusion........................................................................................ 102
5.9 Commitments...................................................................................................................... 104
5.9.1 Conclusion............................................................................................................... 105
5.10 FIP 2014 accounts.............................................................................................................. 106
5.10.1 Conclusion............................................................................................................. 111
5.11 FIP 2015 accounts.............................................................................................................. 111
5.11.1 Conclusion............................................................................................................. 112
5.12 Polo Development Fund.................................................................................................. 112
5.12.1 PY............................................................................................................................ 118
5.12.2 NC-D....................................................................................................................... 120
5.12.3 AJ............................................................................................................................. 122
5.12.4 RC............................................................................................................................ 123
5.12.5 AT............................................................................................................................ 123
5.12.6 Was there a binding three year US$600,000 contract between FIP and MPC/Goldin for the creation of a PDF?................................................................................................ 125
5.12.7 Misconduct…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Yunghanns v Colquhoun-Denvers and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] VSC 433
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the defendant's emails were truthful and whether the defence of qualified privilege applied. The court had to consider whether the defence of qualified privilege was defeated by the defendant's alleged malice. The plaintiff also counterclaimed that three further emails sent between November 2015 and May 2016 were defamatory, which the defendant denied. The court had to determine whether these emails were defamatory and whether the defence of truth was available.
The court found that the defendant's emails were not genuine, authentic, or truthful, and therefore, the defence of justification was not made out. The court also held that the plaintiff did not act dishonestly, and thus, the defence of qualified privilege was not defeated by malice. The court found that the plaintiff's counterclaim was not made out because the defence of truth was available. The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim and the counterclaim. The defendant was not required to pay any damages to the plaintiff.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.