Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Young v King [2013] NSWCA 364 Hearing dates: On the papers Decision date: 31 October 2013 Before: Leeming JA Decision: In proceeding 2013/162966, by consent:
(1) Appeal upheld.
(2) Remit the proceeding to Sheahan J for determination.
(3) Respondents to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
(4) Respondents to have a certificate pursuant to s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, if so qualified.
In proceeding 2013/46329:
Direct the parties to bring in within seven days agreed short minutes of order dealing with proceeding 2013/46329, or alternatively within that time to serve and supply to the Associate to Justice Leeming proposed orders accompanied by short submissions as to the future conduct of that proceeding, including whether any oral hearing is requested and, if so, the reasons why to do so would be consistent with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Catchwords: APPEAL - Consent orders allowing appeal - Court satisfied that respondents' concessions of appellable error properly made Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005, s 56
Supreme Court Act 1970, s 46(1)(a) and (5)
Revised Professional Conduct and Practice Rules 1995, r 19Cases Cited: Cameron v Qantas Airways Ltd [2009] NSWCA 339
John Lysaght Australia Ltd v Butfield [1995] NSWCA 221
Kallinicos v Hunt [2005] NSWSC 1181; 64 NSWLR 561
Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; 239 CLR 531Category: Principal judgment Parties: In proceeding 2013/162966:
In proceeding 2013/46329:
Margo Young (appellant)
Brendan King (first respondent)
Kristina King (second respondent)
Margo Young (applicant)
Land & Environment Court of NSW (first respondent)
Brendan King (second respondent)
Kristina King (third respondent)Representation: Counsel:
R Newell (appellant/applicant)
M Wright (all respondents other than first respondent in proceeding 2013/46329)
Solicitors:
LC Muriniti & Associates (appellant/applicant)
Terrence Stern (all respondents other than first respondent in proceeding 2013/46329)
Crown Solicitor's Office (first respondent in proceeding 2013/46329)
File Number(s): 2013/162966 2013/46329 Decision under appeal
- Citation:
- [2012] NSWLEC 236
- Date of Decision:
- 2012-10-19 00:00:00
- Before:
- Sheahan J
- File Number(s):
- LEC 2003/40417
Judgment
LEEMING JA: Leave to appeal from the interlocutory decision of Sheahan J was granted by the Court constituted by Tobias AJA and me on 22 August 2013. The appeal was set down to be heard on Monday 28 October 2013. By correspondence between the parties and the Registrar of this Court between 21 and 25 October, it became clear that the respondents consented to orders allowing the appeal with costs, and remitting the proceedings to Sheahan J for determination. Those orders reflect two concessions made…
Continue reading Young v King
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Young v King [2013] NSWCA 364
- Case
- [2013] NSWCA 364
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether to uphold the appeal based on the concessions made by the respondents. The court was required to be satisfied that these concessions regarding appellable error were properly made before proceeding to make orders.
Leeming JA, noting the consent of the parties, found that the concessions of appellable error were properly made. Consequently, the Court of Appeal upheld the appeal in proceeding 2013/162966 and remitted the matter to Sheahan J for determination. The respondents were ordered to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal and were granted a certificate pursuant to s 6 of the *Suitors' Fund Act 1951*, provided they qualified. For proceeding 2013/46329, the parties were directed to agree on short minutes of order within seven days, or alternatively, to serve proposed orders with submissions on the future conduct of that proceeding.
Orders
Orders of the court
In proceeding 2013/162966, by consent:
(1) Appeal upheld.
(2) Remit the proceeding to Sheahan J for determination.
(3) Respondents to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal.
(4) Respondents to have a certificate pursuant to s 6 of the Suitors' Fund Act 1951, if so qualified.
In proceeding 2013/46329:
Direct the parties to bring in within seven days agreed short minutes of order dealing with proceeding 2013/46329, or alternatively within that time to serve and supply to the Associate to Justice Leeming proposed orders accompanied by short submissions as to the future conduct of that proceeding, including whether any oral hearing is requested and, if so, the reasons why to do so would be consistent with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.