FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| WILSON v NOWRA COACHES PTY LTD | [2014] FCCA 1916 |
| Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Claimed breach of the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 with respect to living away from home allowance – principles of award interpretation – meaning of the word ‘day’ in the context of the Award – Award coverage of casual employees. |
| Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth), s.15AA Customs Act 1901(Cth), ss.4(1), 203R(1) Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss.45, 47(1), 48(1), 371(2), 540, 545(2)(b), 548(1A) National Transport Commission Act 2003 (Cth) Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 [MA000063] |
| Buresti v Beveridge (1999) 88 FCR 399 Statement of the President of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, Justice Giudice, 29 April 2008, [2008] AIRC 387 |
| Applicant: | PETER JAMES WILSON |
| Respondent: | NOWRA COACHES PTY LTD |
| File Number: | MLG 1580 of 2013 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Whelan |
| Hearing date: | 10 April 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 10 April 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 29 August 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Applicant in person |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr P King |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Australian Public Transport Association |
ORDERS:
THE COURT DECLARES THAT:
The Respondent breached s.45 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 [MA000063] by failing to pay the Applicant in accordance with clause 15.2(c)(i) of the Award.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Pursuant to s.545(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), the Respondent pay the Applicant the sum of $13,219.24 forthwith.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLG 1580 of 2013
| PETER JAMES WILSON |
Applicant
And
| NOWRA COACHES PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an application by PETER JAMES WILSON (“the Applicant”) in which he claims that he was underpaid by the Respondent,
NOWRA COACHES PTY LTD(“the Respondent”). The Applicant claims breaches by the Respondent of provisions of the Passenger Vehicle Transportation Award 2010 (“the Award”) with respect to the payment of allowances. The relevant provision is at cl.15.2(c) of the Award:
(c) Living away from home allowance
(i)An employee whose employment necessitates absence from home and who is unable to conveniently return home will be paid a minimum of eight hours per day Monday to Friday and a minimum of eight hours per day on Saturdays or…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Wilson v Nowra Coaches Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FCCA 1916
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine whether the bus driver's conduct constituted negligence at common law. This involved assessing whether the driver owed a duty of care to Ms. Wilson, whether that duty was breached by the driver's actions or omissions, and whether such a breach caused or materially contributed to Ms. Wilson's injuries. The court also had to consider the plaintiff's own conduct to determine if there was any contributory negligence on her part.
Judge Whelan found that the bus driver had breached his duty of care to Ms. Wilson. The court reasoned that the driver had failed to ensure the bus doors were properly secured before commencing the journey, and that this failure was a direct cause of Ms. Wilson falling from the moving vehicle. While acknowledging that Ms. Wilson had been standing when she fell, the court determined that the primary cause of her injuries was the driver's negligence in failing to secure the doors. The court found no contributory negligence on the part of Ms. Wilson.
Consequently, the court entered judgment for the plaintiff, Ms. Wilson, and ordered that the defendant, Nowra Coaches Pty Ltd, pay damages to be assessed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.