Willett v Futcher

Case [2003] QSC 36


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Willett & Anor v Futcher [2003] QSC 036

PARTIES:

DEBORAH ANN WILLETT
(first plaintiff)
BELINDA ANN WILLETT (an infant by her Litigation Guardians DEBORAH ANN WILLETT and PATRICK WILLETT)
(second plaintiff)
DUDLEY D FUTCHER
(defendant)

FILE NO/S:

SC No 4579 of 1980

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Trial

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

25 February 2003

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

11 February 2003

JUDGE:

White J

ORDER:

The defendant pay to the administrator of the second plaintiff’s trust fund the amount of $180,000 for the reasonable cost of managing the fund and the receipt of the administrator for that sum shall be sufficient discharge for the payment by the defendant

CATCHWORDS:

DAMAGES – MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – brain-damaged plaintiff – cost of fund management as head of damages – whether investment advice component should be added to quantum of plaintiff’s award

TORTS – NEGLIGENCE – DAMAGE - CAUSATION

Guardianship and Administration Act
2000 ss 12, 15, 20, 47, 48, 245

Campbell v Nangle (1985-1986) 40 SASR 161
Government Insurance office of New South Wales v Rosniak (1992) 27 NSWLR 665
Harris v Commercial Minerals Limited (1996) 186 CLR 1
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v Mandzuk [1988] 2 SCR 650; (1988) 53 DLR (4th) 606
Manser v Spry (1994) 181 CLR 428
MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657
Mullins v Duck [1988] 2 Qd R 674
The Nominal Defendant v Gardikiotis (1995-1996) 186 CLR 49
Todorovic v Waller (1981) 150 CLR 402
Treonne Wholesale Meats Pty Ltd v Shaheen (1988) 12 NSWLR 522
Wills v Bell decision of Mullins J 14 December 2001 No. 715 of 1995
Wills v Bell decision of Court of Appeal 11 October 2002 [2002] QCA 419

COUNSEL:

Mr T Matthews and Mr P Matthews for the second plaintiff
Mr D Fraser QC for the defendant
Mr P McMurdo QC and Mr P Liddy for the Public Trustee
Mr D C Rangiah for the Public Advocate

SOLICITORS:

Quinlan Miller & Treston for the second plaintiff
McInnes Wilson for the defendant
Official Solicitor to the Public Trustee for the Public Trustee
Public Advocate for the Public Advocate

  1. On 24 December 2002 Byrne J sanctioned a compromise of the second plaintiff’s action against the defendant.  She had sustained severe brain and other physical injuries as a result of a motor vehicle collision on 31 July 1979 when she was about 9 weeks old.  She is now aged 23.  Her parents are her litigation guardians and care for her in their home.

  1. His Honour sanctioned the compromise of the second plaintiff’s claim by ordering that:

“The defendant pay to the second plaintiff … the sum of $3,850,000 (Three Million Eight Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars), together with the sum by way of damages in respect of reasonable management fees in respect of so much of the lastmentioned sum as shall be lodged as directed by the court with the Public Trustee of…

Continue reading Willett v Futcher

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Willett v Futcher [2003] QSC 36
Case
[2003] QSC 36
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Willett v Futcher involved a dispute between the plaintiff, who suffered severe brain injuries due to the defendant's negligence, and the defendant, who was liable for the injuries. The primary issue in the case was the determination of the appropriate measure of damages for the plaintiff's injuries, specifically the cost of managing the plaintiff's trust fund and whether this should include the cost of investment advice as part of the damages awarded. The case was heard and determined in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The court had to decide whether the cost of fund management should be considered as a head of damages for personal injuries and if the cost of investment advice should be included as part of this quantum. The court examined whether such costs were reasonably necessary and incurred as a result of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The second issue pertained to the causation of the plaintiff's injuries and the extent to which the defendant's negligence contributed to the plaintiff's condition.

The Supreme Court of New South Wales ruled that the cost of managing the trust fund, including the reasonable cost of fund management, was a proper head of damages for personal injuries. The court found that the costs were necessary and incurred as a result of the plaintiff's injuries. However, the court determined that the cost of investment advice was not an integral part of the fund management and should not be included in the damages awarded. The court emphasised that the damages awarded should be directly related to the consequences of the injuries and not ancillary costs not directly attributable to the injuries themselves.

The final orders of the court mandated that the defendant pay $180,000 to the administrator of the second plaintiff's trust fund for the reasonable cost of managing the fund. The receipt of this sum by the administrator was deemed sufficient discharge of the defendant's liability for the payment. This decision clarified the scope of recoverable damages in cases involving trust fund management for brain-damaged plaintiffs.

Orders

Orders of the court

The defendant pay to the administrator of the second plaintiff’s trust fund the amount of $180,000 for the reasonable cost of managing the fund and the receipt of the administrator for that sum shall be sufficient discharge for the payment by the defendant

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.