| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
| CITATION: | Walton v Guardian Protection Services (Aust) Pty Ltd [2024] NSWPIC 107 |
| APPLICANT: | Stephen Walton |
| RESPONDENT: | Guardian Protection Services (Aust) Pty Limited |
| MEMBER: | Gaius Whiffin |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 7 March 2024 |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION - Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for accepted injuries to the cervical spine and both shoulders, together with a disputed consequential condition to the left knee alleged to result from the accepted injuries; claim for compensation pursuant to section 66; consideration of applicant’s statement, medical reports and other treatment records, as well as claim correspondence; consideration of whether the applicant sustained a consequential injury to his left knee resulting from his accepted injuries, during exercise physiology sessions in late 2021/early 2022; Shao Wen Zheng v Guo Yong Yang & Ors, Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes, Kumar v Royal Comfort Bedding Pty Ltd, Kooragang Cement Pty Ltd v Bates, Moon v Conmah Pty Limited, Kennedy Cleaning Services Pty Ltd v Petkoska, Trustees of the Society of St Vincent de Paul (NSW) v Maxwell James Kear as administrator of the estate of Anthony John Kear, Galluzzo v Commonwealth Bank of Australia, North Coast Area Health Service v Felstead, Corestaff Australia NSW Pty Limited v Lashbrook, Drca v KAB Seating Systems Pty Ltd, Bindah v Carter Holt Harvey Woodproducts Australia Pty Limited, and Jaffarie v Quality Castings Pty Limited considered; Held – the applicant has sustained a consequential injury to his left knee resulting from his accepted injuries, during exercise physiology sessions in late 2021/early 2022; the determination of the applicant’s whole person impairment will be remitted to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | The Commission determines: 1. The applicant has sustained a consequential injury to his left knee resulting from his accepted 22 March 2020 (deemed date) injury, during exercise physiology sessions in late 2021/early 2022. The Commission orders: 1. I remit this matter to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor pursuant to s 321 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 for assessment as follows: (a) date of injury: 22 March 2020 (deemed); (b) body systems/parts: cervical spine, right upper extremity (shoulder), left upper extremity (shoulder), left lower extremity (knee), and (c) method of assessment: whole person impairment. 2. The documents to be reviewed by the Medical Assessor are: (a) this Certificate of Determination; (b) the Application to Resolve a Dispute and attached documents, and (c) the Reply lodged by the respondent and attached documents. 3. Following the completion of the medical assessment process, the matter will be listed before me again for a preliminary conference in order to deal with all outstanding disputes in the matter. |
STATEMENT OF REASONS
BACKGROUND
Stephen Walton (the applicant) is 43-years-old. He was employed by Guardian Protection Services (Aust) Pty Limited (the respondent) as a labourer between November 2018 and December 2020, during which time he sustained injuries to his cervical spine and both shoulders,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Walton v Guardian Protection Services (Aust) Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWPIC 107
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The tribunal was required to determine whether Walton's left knee injury was a consequential injury of the accepted cervical spine and shoulder injuries, and if so, whether it arose out of the employment and in the course of employment. The tribunal considered Walton's statement, medical reports, treatment records, and correspondence related to the claim. Relevant case law, including Shao Wen Zheng v Guo Yong Yang & Ors, Nguyen v Cosmopolitan Homes, and others, was also considered to assist in determining the nature of the consequential injury and its connection to the employment.
The tribunal found that Walton had sustained a consequential injury to his left knee during exercise physiology sessions in late 2021/early 2022, which arose out of and in the course of his employment. Consequently, the tribunal held that Walton's claim for compensation for the left knee injury was valid. The tribunal remitted the determination of Walton's whole person impairment to the President for referral to a Medical Assessor to assess the impact of the left knee injury on his overall impairment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.