DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
TG v CK & Anor [2021] QDC 258
PARTIES:
TG
(appellant)
v
CK
(first respondent)
and
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
(second respondent)
FILE NO/S:
2 of 2021
DIVISION:
Appellate
PROCEEDING:
Appeal pursuant to section 164 of the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 2012
ORIGINATING COURT:
Magistrates Court of Queensland
DELIVERED ON:
20 October 2021
DELIVERED AT:
Gympie
HEARING DATE:
18 October 2021
JUDGE:
Judge Loury QC
ORDER:
1. Set aside the decision of the learned Magistrate
2. Remit the matter to the Magistrates Court to be heard by a different Magistrate
COUNSEL:
The appellant was unrepresented
The first respondent was unrepresented
J Paratz for the second respondent
SOLICITORS:
The appellant was unrepresented
The first respondent was unrepresented
Queensland Police Service Legal Unit for the second respondent
On 15 January 2021 a domestic violence order was made against the appellant by a learned Magistrate. The matter had been listed for hearing in the Magistrates Court on the date the order was made. The application was brought by the Queensland Police Service on behalf of the aggrieved.
The appellant appeals against the making of the order. He seeks an order that the matter be remitted for a rehearing before another Magistrate.
The order made contained the following conditions:
1. The respondent be of good behaviour towards the aggrieved and not commit domestic violence against the aggrieved;
2. The respondent be of good behaviour towards the named persons [the husband and two children of the aggrieved] and must not commit associated domestic violence against the named persons and not expose the children to domestic violence;
3. The respondent is prohibited from
(i) entering or attempting to enter
(ii) approaching to within 100 metres of
(iii) the premises where the aggrieved and named associate live or work
4. The respondent is prohibited from locating, attempting to locate or asking someone else to locate the aggrieved and named associate.
5. The respondent is prohibited from contacting or attempting to contact or asking someone else other than a lawyer to contact the aggrieved and named associate and children.
Except when attending an agreed conference, counselling or mediation.
Except when having contact with a child or children as set out in writing between the parties or in compliance with an order of a court.
Except when using an approved Family Law messaging application.
6. The respondent is prohibited from following or approaching to within 10 metres of the aggrieved and named associate when at any place.
Except when appearing personally before a Court or Tribunal.
Except when attending an agreed conference, counselling or mediation.
Except when having contact with a child or children as set out in writing between the parties or in compliance with an order of a court.
The order made was for two years.
The learned Magistrate also amended an order of the Federal Circuit Court dated 21 November 2018. The amendments made (which appear in bold below) were to paragraph [24] and paragraph [22] (which followed on…
Continue reading TG v CK
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- TG v CK [2021] QDC 258
- Case
- [2021] QDC 258
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Magistrates Court properly considered all relevant factors and exercised its discretion appropriately when deciding not to grant a parenting order to TG. The court was tasked with reviewing the Magistrates Court's decision to determine if it was open to the court to come to the same conclusion, or if a different outcome was warranted.
The Supreme Court found that the Magistrates Court did not adequately consider all relevant factors in making its decision. The court held that the Magistrates Court's decision was not open to it due to the failure to properly consider the evidence and the relevant statutory criteria. As a result, the Supreme Court set aside the decision of the Magistrates Court and remitted the matter back to the Magistrates Court to be heard by a different Magistrate. This ensures that the matter is reconsidered with a proper application of the relevant law and consideration of all pertinent factors.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Set aside the decision of the learned Magistrate
2. Remit the matter to the Magistrates Court to be heard by a different Magistrate
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.