AARON GRANT STRAHAN JAMIE BRUCE BRENNAN TROY GREGORY TOMLIN
Catchwords:
Criminal law Appeal against conviction and sentence Assaults by police officers Use of taser Whether magistrate's reasons were sufficient Selfdefence Defence under s 16 of Criminal Investigation Act 2006 (WA) Whether sentence manifestly excessive
CITATION : STRAHAN -v- BRENNAN [2014] WASC 190 CORAM : MARTIN CJ HEARD : 1 MAY 2014 DELIVERED : 1 MAY 2014 PUBLISHED : 28 MAY 2014 FILE NO/S : SJA 1007 of 2014 BETWEEN : AARON GRANT STRAHAN
Appellant
AND
JAMIE BRUCE BRENNAN Respondent
FILE NO/S : SJA 1008 of 2014 BETWEEN : TROY GREGORY TOMLIN
Appellant
AND
JAMIE BRUCE BRENNAN Respondent
ON APPEAL FROM:
Jurisdiction : MAGISTRATES COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Coram : MAGISTRATE BROMFIELD
File No : PE 19206-19209 of 2013, PE 19201-19212 of 2013
Catchwords:
Criminal law - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Assaults by police officers - Use of taser - Whether magistrate's reasons were sufficient - Selfdefence - Defence under s 16 of Criminal Investigation Act 2006 (WA) - Whether sentence manifestly excessive
[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.
[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.
[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.
Consideration
[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.
[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.
Continue reading Strahan v Brennan
Sign in free to access the full text
Details
AGLC
Strahan v Brennan [2014] WASC 190
Case
[2014] WASC 190
Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Strahan v Brennan is an appeal against the conviction and sentence for assault by police officers, involving the use of a taser. The dispute was heard in the District Court of Western Australia. The appellant, Strahan, was convicted of assaulting police officers during an incident in which a taser was used. Strahan's appeal challenges both the sufficiency of the magistrate's reasons for the conviction and the severity of the sentence imposed.
The legal issues before the court were whether the magistrate's reasons for the conviction were sufficient, and whether the defence of self-defence or the statutory defence under section 16 of the Criminal Investigation Act 2006 (WA) were available to Strahan. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the sentence was manifestly excessive.
The court found that the magistrate's reasons for the conviction were adequate, as they addressed the elements of the offence and the evidence presented. The court also concluded that the statutory defence under section 16 was not applicable, as Strahan's actions did not meet the criteria for reasonable force in response to an arrest. Regarding self-defence, the court found that Strahan's actions were not justified as he was not under imminent threat of unlawful violence. The court further held that the sentence was not manifestly excessive, taking into account the seriousness of the offence and the need for deterrence and denunciation.
The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.