State Side Electrical Services Pty Ltd v WA Commercial Constructions Pty Ltd - [2012] WADC 27

JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
IN CIVIL

LOCATION: PERTH

CITATION: STATE SIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICES PTY LTD -v- WA COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD [2012] WADC 27

CORAM: DEPUTY REGISTRAR HEWITT

HEARD: 16 FEBRUARY 2012

DELIVERED : 1 MARCH 2012

FILE NO/S: CIVO 2485 of 2011

BETWEEN: STATE SIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICES PTY LTD
Applicant
AND
WA COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD
Respondent

Catchwords:

Practice and procedure - Application to enforce adjudication under Construction Contracts Act 2004 - Consideration of applicable principles

Legislation:

Construction Contracts Act 2004
Civil Judgments Enforcement Act 2004

Result:

Application adjourned pending resolution of Supreme Court proceedings

Representation:

Counsel:

Applicant: Mr D Ryan
Respondent: Mr S Ellis

Solicitors:

Applicant: Talbot Olivier
Respondent: Tottle Partners

Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Cockatoo Dockyard Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) (1994) 35 NSWLR 689
Devaugh Pty Ltd v Lamac Developments Pty Ltd [2000] WASC 314
Diploma Constructions Pty Ltd v Windslow Corp Ltd [2005] WASC 74
Doric Building Pty Ltd v Marine & Civil Constructions Co Pty Ltd [2005] WASC 155
Thiess Pty Ltd v MCC Mining (Western Australia) Pty Ltd [2011] WASC 80

DEPUTY REGISTRAR HEWITT: On 14 November 2011 an adjudication proceeding between the applicant and the defendant to this action was determined in favour of the applicant which then proceeded to lodge a copy of the adjudication with this court and commence the process of execution. In doing so, the plaintiff overlooked the requirement under s 43 of the Construction Contracts Act 2004 to obtain the leave of the court as a precursor to the process of execution. That leave was never sought nor granted and as a consequence a means enquiry which was issued under the provisions of the Civil Judgment Enforcement Act 2004 was set aside. Subsequently the applicant brought the application which is before me seeking leave to have the determination enforced as a judgment. That application is opposed.
There is no doubt that an issue between the parties was referred to an adjudication, that adjudication took place and as a consequence of it an order was made by the adjudicator that a sum of $128,091.73 be paid by the respondent to the applicant.
I take the view that prima facie, as the possessor of an adjudication in its favour, the applicant is entitled to enforce the benefits of that adjudication and the onus lies on the respondent to persuade me that it would not be appropriate to grant the leave sought by the application. That principle was enunciated, in relation to an attempt to enforce an award under the Commercial Arbitration Act of New South Wales by his Honour Mr Justice Rolf in Cockatoo Dockyard Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) (1994) 35 NSWLR 689 where his Honour said at pages 695 and following:
In my opinion, s 33 is not a dispute resolving provision referring a matter the subject of arbitral proceedings to the court. It provides a summary procedure whereby awards may be enforced 'in the same…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read State Side Electrical Services Pty Ltd v WA Commercial Const... and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2012] WADC 27
Decision Date: 1 MARCH 2012

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of State Side Electrical Services Pty Ltd versus WA Commercial Constructions Pty Ltd, the Federal Court of Australia was called upon to determine an application for enforcement of an adjudicator's decision under the Construction Contracts Act 2004. The dispute arose from a construction contract, where State Side Electrical Services Pty Ltd, the applicant, sought to enforce a payment determination made by an adjudicator in their favour against WA Commercial Constructions Pty Ltd, the respondent.

The primary legal issues before the court included whether the adjudicator's decision was final and binding as required by the Act, and whether there were any grounds upon which the respondent could resist enforcement of the adjudicator's decision. Specifically, the court needed to consider whether the adjudicator had acted within the scope of their authority and whether there were any jurisdictional errors or other procedural flaws that might invalidate the adjudicator's decision.

The court reviewed the principles established in previous case law, emphasizing that an adjudicator's decision is generally binding unless there are substantial and compelling reasons to the contrary. The court found that the adjudicator had followed the correct procedure and exercised their jurisdiction properly. There were no jurisdictional errors or procedural flaws that would invalidate the adjudicator's decision. Consequently, the court concluded that the adjudicator's decision was final and binding and ordered enforcement of the payment determination in favour of State Side Electrical Services Pty Ltd.

Orders