Silberstein v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 55468

Link copied
Case Copied 80 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Silberstein v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 & Ors [2024] NSWCATCD 66
Hearing dates: 6, 7 and 8 June 2023
Date of orders: 08 November 2024
Decision date: 08 November 2024
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: D Goldstein. Senior Member
Decision:

(1)   The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 must carry out the work described in Schedule 1 with due care and skill by 14 February 2025.

(2) A hearing on Jessica Silberstein re-opening her case is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.

(3)    Jessica Silberstein has leave to re-open her case to rely on her affidavit affirmed on 24 August 2023.

(4)    The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 must pay Jessica Silberstein $316,128.43 immediately.

(5)    Jessica Silberstein’s application against Strata Choice Pty Ltd is dismissed.

(6)    Jessica Silberstein’s application against Hecker Australia Pty Ltd is dismissed.

(7)    Jessica Silberstein’s case in negligence against

(8)    Michael Adamo, Michael Hans Engelbert, William Paul O’Brien and Terrance Matthew Gagen is dismissed.

(9)    Michael Adamo is removed from the strata committee of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 and restrained from acting in the position of an office holder of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 or as a strata committee member of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 for a period of not less than one year from the date of making these orders.

(10)  Jessica Silberstein’s application to remove William Paul O’Brien from the strata committee of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 is dismissed.

(11)  Jessica Silberstein’s application to remove Terrance Matthew Gagen from the strata committee of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 is dismissed.

(12)  In the event that a party is minded to make an application for costs, such application must be lodged in the Tribunal and served on/given to the costs respondent(s) within 21 days of the date of the orders in these proceedings either attaching or referring to the documents relied upon in support of the application.

(13) The costs respondent(s) will have 21 days after the date it, she or he receives the application to lodge in the Tribunal and serve on/give to the costs applicant her, his or its submissions, if any, in response to the costs application, such submissions either attaching or referring to the documents relied upon.

(14) The parties must state in their submissions whether or not they consent to the costs application being determined on the basis of the parties written submissions and attached documents, if any, without the need for a hearing.

(15) Subject to the parties’ submissions, the Tribunal will determine any costs application made on the basis of the submissions and papers filed in the Tribunal.

Catchwords:

LAND LAW – Strata title – Owners corporation - Common Property – Repair and Maintenance – Adequacy of work under section 106 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 - Section 260…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Silberstein v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 55468 and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWCATCD 66
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Silberstein v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 55468 involved Jessica Silberstein as the applicant and The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 as the defendant. The dispute centred around issues of repair and maintenance in a strata title property, particularly focusing on the adequacy of work carried out under section 106 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. The case also explored the meaning of good faith, the liability of strata committee members, and the duty of care of the strata managing agent and building manager. The matter was heard by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide included whether the work done by the Owners corporation was adequate under section 106 of the Act, the interpretation of good faith in the context of strata management, the liability of the strata committee members, and the duty of care owed by the strata managing agent and building manager. Additionally, the court had to consider the applicability of loss of amenity and aggravated damages, and whether there was serious misconduct warranting the removal of a strata committee member. The court also needed to determine whether Silberstein's case could be re-opened to rely on an affidavit affirmed on 24 August 2023.

The court found that the Owners corporation had not carried out the necessary work with due care and skill as required by section 106 of the Act. It held that the work was inadequate and ordered the Owners corporation to remedy this by carrying out the specified work by a set deadline. The court also granted Silberstein leave to re-open her case based on the affidavit affirmed on 24 August 2023. The tribunal ordered that Silberstein be paid $316,128.43 immediately by the Owners corporation. The applications for damages against the strata managing agent, building manager, and individual strata committee members were dismissed. However, the court found serious misconduct by Michael Adamo and ordered his removal from the strata committee and restraint from acting as an office holder or strata committee member for at least one year. Applications to remove other committee members were dismissed.

The final orders of the tribunal included directives for the Owners corporation to perform specified repairs, granted Silberstein leave to re-open her case, ordered immediate payment, and dismissed various applications for damages and removal of committee members. The tribunal also outlined procedures for any subsequent applications for costs, including timeframes and the potential for written submissions without a hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 must carry out the work described in Schedule 1 with due care and skill by 14 February 2025.

(2) A hearing on Jessica Silberstein re-opening her case is dispensed with pursuant to section 50(2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013.

(3) Jessica Silberstein has leave to re-open her case to rely on her affidavit affirmed on 24 August 2023.

(4) The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 must pay Jessica Silberstein $316,128.43 immediately.

(5) Jessica Silberstein’s application against Strata Choice Pty Ltd is dismissed.

(6) Jessica Silberstein’s application against Hecker Australia Pty Ltd is dismissed.

(7) Jessica Silberstein’s case in negligence against

(8) Michael Adamo, Michael Hans Engelbert, William Paul O’Brien and Terrance Matthew Gagen is dismissed.

(9) Michael Adamo is removed from the strata committee of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 and restrained from acting in the position of an office holder of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 or as a strata committee member of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 for a period of not less than one year from the date of making these orders.

(10) Jessica Silberstein’s application to remove William Paul O’Brien from the strata committee of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 is dismissed.

(11) Jessica Silberstein’s application to remove Terrance Matthew Gagen from the strata committee of The Owners – Strata Plan No. 55468 is dismissed.

(12) In the event that a party is minded to make an application for costs, such application must be lodged in the Tribunal and served on/given to the costs respondent(s) within 21 days of the date of the orders in these proceedings either attaching or referring to the documents relied upon in support of the application.

(13) The costs respondent(s) will have 21 days after the date it, she or he receives the application to lodge in the Tribunal and serve on/give to the costs applicant her, his or its submissions, if any, in response to the costs application, such submissions either attaching or referring to the documents relied upon.

(14) The parties must state in their submissions whether or not they consent to the costs application being determined on the basis of the parties written submissions and attached documents, if any, without the need for a hearing.

(15) Subject to the parties’ submissions, the Tribunal will determine any costs application made on the basis of the submissions and papers filed in the Tribunal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.