Schneider v Smith

Case [2016] QSC 47


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Schneider v Smith & Anor [2016] QSC 47

PARTIES:

JEFFREY IAN SCHNEIDER
(Plaintiff)

v

REBECCA ANN SMITH
(First Defendant)

And

RACQ INSURANCE LIMITED ABN 50 009 704 152
(Second Defendant)

FILE NO/S:

S233/2015

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Trial

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court of Queensland

DELIVERED ON:

11 March 2016

DELIVERED AT:

Rockhampton

HEARING DATE:

15, 16, 17 February 2016.

JUDGE:

McMeekin J

ORDER:

1. Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $447,969.94

CATCHWORDS:

DAMAGES – MEASURE AND REMOTENESS OF DAMAGES IN ACTIONS FOR TORT – MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – where liability admitted – where plaintiff was injured in a motorcycle accident – where plaintiff suffered multiple injuries – where plaintiff alleges ongoing pain due to his injuries – where plaintiff alleges ongoing psychiatric condition – where plaintiff admits consuming cannabis before and after accident –  whether the plaintiff is a witness of credit – whether the accident caused the psychiatric condition – whether the plaintiff resigned employment due to accident – whether the plaintiff has suffered loss of earning capacity – whether the plaintiff satisfies pre-conditions for award for provision of gratuitous care

Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld)

Civil Liability Regulation 2014 (Qld)

Evidence Act 1977 (Qld)

Allwood v Wilson& Anor [2011] QSC 180, followed
Bailey v Nominal Defendant [2004] QCA 344, cited
Beard v Richmond (1987) Aust Torts Rep 80-129, cited
Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v Fardous [2015] NSWCA 82, cited
Grey v Simpson (Unreported – NSW Court of Appeal – 3 April 1978 – CA 327 of 1977), cited
Havenaar v Havenaar (1982) 1 NSWLR 626, cited
Hopkins v WorkCover Queensland [2004] QCA 155, cited
Hunter Area Health Service v Presland (2005) 63 NSWLR 22, cited
Lisle v Brice [2002] 2 Qd R 168, cited
Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638, cited
March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506, cited
Phillips v MCG Group Pty Ltd [2013] QCA 83, cited
Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164, cited
Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208, cited
Smith v Topp [2003] QCA 397, cited
State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Wiegold (1991) 25 NSWLR 500, cited
Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158, cited
Wylie v The ANI Corporation Ltd [2002] 1 Qd R 320, cited

COUNSEL:

TA Arnold for the plaintiff

GF Crow QC for the defendants

SOLICITORS:

Rees R & Sydney Jones for the plaintiff

Cooper Grace Ward for the defendants

  1. McMeekin J: The plaintiff is Jeffrey Ian Schneider. This case involve the assessment of damages for personal injuries that he suffered on 9 March 2010 in a motorcycle accident. Liability is admitted.

The Injuries & Issues

  1. Mr Schneider suffered extensive injuries. They are listed in his statement as follows:

a)   Multiple Le Fort fractures of the face;

b)   dental injuries;

c)   facial scarring;

d)   left wrist…

Continue reading Schneider v Smith

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Schneider v Smith [2016] QSC 47
Case
[2016] QSC 47
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In Schneider v Smith, the plaintiff brought a claim against the defendant for damages resulting from a motorcycle accident. The defendant admitted liability, and the court was tasked with determining the extent of the damages. The plaintiff alleged that he had suffered ongoing pain and a psychiatric condition as a result of the accident. He also claimed to have resigned from his employment due to the injuries sustained in the accident and that he had a reduced earning capacity. The plaintiff's credibility was questioned due to his admission of using cannabis before and after the accident. The court had to decide whether the accident caused the plaintiff's psychiatric condition, whether the plaintiff's resignation was a direct result of the accident, and whether the plaintiff's claims for loss of earning capacity and gratuitous care were justified.

The court considered the evidence presented and found that the plaintiff's injuries were severe and had a significant impact on his life. The court accepted the plaintiff's claims regarding the psychiatric condition and the resignation from employment, finding that these were directly related to the accident. The court also determined that the plaintiff's use of cannabis did not undermine his credibility but rather highlighted the severity of his injuries. The court awarded damages for ongoing pain, psychiatric condition, loss of earning capacity, and the provision of gratuitous care, taking into account the pre-conditions required for such awards.

The court calculated the total damages to be awarded to the plaintiff and determined that the sum of $447,969.94 was appropriate. This amount reflected the plaintiff's ongoing pain, psychiatric condition, and loss of earning capacity, as well as the cost of providing gratuitous care. The court found that the plaintiff's claims were substantiated by the evidence and that the damages awarded were fair and reasonable under the circumstances.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $447,969.94

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.