SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Schneider v Smith & Anor [2016] QSC 47
PARTIES:
JEFFREY IAN SCHNEIDER
(Plaintiff)v
REBECCA ANN SMITH
(First Defendant)
And
RACQ INSURANCE LIMITED ABN 50 009 704 152
(Second Defendant)FILE NO/S:
S233/2015
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
Trial
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court of Queensland
DELIVERED ON:
11 March 2016
DELIVERED AT:
Rockhampton
HEARING DATE:
15, 16, 17 February 2016.
JUDGE:
McMeekin J
ORDER:
1. Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $447,969.94
CATCHWORDS:
DAMAGES – MEASURE AND REMOTENESS OF DAMAGES IN ACTIONS FOR TORT – MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – where liability admitted – where plaintiff was injured in a motorcycle accident – where plaintiff suffered multiple injuries – where plaintiff alleges ongoing pain due to his injuries – where plaintiff alleges ongoing psychiatric condition – where plaintiff admits consuming cannabis before and after accident – whether the plaintiff is a witness of credit – whether the accident caused the psychiatric condition – whether the plaintiff resigned employment due to accident – whether the plaintiff has suffered loss of earning capacity – whether the plaintiff satisfies pre-conditions for award for provision of gratuitous care
Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld)
Civil Liability Regulation 2014 (Qld)
Evidence Act 1977 (Qld)
Allwood v Wilson& Anor [2011] QSC 180, followed
Bailey v Nominal Defendant [2004] QCA 344, cited
Beard v Richmond (1987) Aust Torts Rep 80-129, cited
Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v Fardous [2015] NSWCA 82, cited
Grey v Simpson (Unreported – NSW Court of Appeal – 3 April 1978 – CA 327 of 1977), cited
Havenaar v Havenaar (1982) 1 NSWLR 626, cited
Hopkins v WorkCover Queensland [2004] QCA 155, cited
Hunter Area Health Service v Presland (2005) 63 NSWLR 22, cited
Lisle v Brice [2002] 2 Qd R 168, cited
Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638, cited
March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506, cited
Phillips v MCG Group Pty Ltd [2013] QCA 83, cited
Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164, cited
Seltsam Pty Ltd v Ghaleb [2005] NSWCA 208, cited
Smith v Topp [2003] QCA 397, cited
State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Wiegold (1991) 25 NSWLR 500, cited
Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158, cited
Wylie v The ANI Corporation Ltd [2002] 1 Qd R 320, citedCOUNSEL:
TA Arnold for the plaintiff
GF Crow QC for the defendants
SOLICITORS:
Rees R & Sydney Jones for the plaintiff
Cooper Grace Ward for the defendants
McMeekin J: The plaintiff is Jeffrey Ian Schneider. This case involve the assessment of damages for personal injuries that he suffered on 9 March 2010 in a motorcycle accident. Liability is admitted.
The Injuries & Issues
Mr Schneider suffered extensive injuries. They are listed in his statement as follows:
a) Multiple Le Fort fractures of the face;
b) dental injuries;
c) facial scarring;
d) left wrist…
Continue reading Schneider v Smith
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Schneider v Smith [2016] QSC 47
- Case
- [2016] QSC 47
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the evidence presented and found that the plaintiff's injuries were severe and had a significant impact on his life. The court accepted the plaintiff's claims regarding the psychiatric condition and the resignation from employment, finding that these were directly related to the accident. The court also determined that the plaintiff's use of cannabis did not undermine his credibility but rather highlighted the severity of his injuries. The court awarded damages for ongoing pain, psychiatric condition, loss of earning capacity, and the provision of gratuitous care, taking into account the pre-conditions required for such awards.
The court calculated the total damages to be awarded to the plaintiff and determined that the sum of $447,969.94 was appropriate. This amount reflected the plaintiff's ongoing pain, psychiatric condition, and loss of earning capacity, as well as the cost of providing gratuitous care. The court found that the plaintiff's claims were substantiated by the evidence and that the damages awarded were fair and reasonable under the circumstances.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $447,969.94
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.