Rana v Survery

Link copied
Case Copied 55 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Rana v Survery [2013] NSWCA 234
Hearing dates:26 February 2013
Decision date: 24 July 2013
Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Macfarlan JA at [83]; Hoeben JA at [84]
Decision:

Appeal dismissed with costs

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Catchwords: ASSOCIATIONS AND CLUBS - incorporated association - resolution at committee meeting regarding nominees for membership - whether primary judge erred as to resolution to approve candidates.
ASSOCIATIONS AND CLUBS - incorporated association - effect of a conclusive evidence provision in the Association's Constitution.
Legislation Cited: Associations Incorporation Act 1984, s 11, s19
Associations Incorporation Act 2009, s 26
Associations Incorporation Regulation 1999, Schedule 1
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 140
Cases Cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; (2012) 86 ALJR 522
Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22; (2003) 214 CLR 118
Kerr v John Mottram Ltd [1940] 1 Ch 657
Islamic Association of Western Suburbs Sydney v Survery [2008] NSWSC 875
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Wajahat Ali Khan Rana (First appellant)
Mohammad Abdul Sami (Second appellant)
Rab Nawaz (Third appellant)
Hafizur Rahman Khan Survery (First respondent)
Masud Cheema (Second respondent)
Islamic Association Western Suburbs Sydney Incorporated (Third respondent)
The Australian Islamic College of Sydney Limited (Fourth respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
P Taylor SC and A M Pickles (Appellants)
A Cheshire (Respondents)
Solicitors:
Denison Toyer (Appellants)
NA Lawyers (Respondents)
File Number(s):2012/306283
Publication restriction:No
 Decision under appeal 
Jurisdiction:
9111
Citation:
[2012] NSWSC 905
Date of Decision:
2012-08-10 00:00:00
Before:
Pembroke J
File Number(s):
2011/400057

Judgment

  1. BATHURST CJ: This is an appeal from a judgment of a judge of the Equity Division of the Court in which his Honour dismissed a claim brought by the appellants that 183 or 186 persons were validly admitted to membership of the Islamic Association Western Suburbs Sydney Inc. (the Association) at a meeting of the Executive Council of the Association on 21 November 2008. As the appeal was ultimately formulated, it was contended that there were 175 persons admitted on that date, being "the 175 people listed on the handwritten list that was Exhibit B in the proceedings" and whose names are set out in a typewritten list annexure marked "21 November 2008 Executive Council Resolution List".

Background

  1. The Association is an incorporated association that at the relevant time was incorporated under the Associations Incorporation Act 1984 (Act). Its objectives as stated in its Constitution are to "foster and promote Islam and to assist Muslims to abide by the principles of Islam in regard to their social, moral and spiritual way of life and to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Rana v Survery and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2013] NSWCA 234
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The New South Wales Court of Appeal considered an appeal by the applicant, Rana, against a decision of the primary judge concerning a resolution passed at a committee meeting of an incorporated association. The dispute centred on whether the primary judge had erred in their interpretation of the resolution to approve candidates for membership.

The Court was required to determine two primary legal issues. Firstly, it had to consider whether the primary judge had correctly interpreted the effect of the resolution passed by the committee regarding the approval of nominees for membership. Secondly, the Court was asked to consider the legal effect of a "conclusive evidence" provision within the association's constitution.

In its reasoning, the Court of Appeal examined the terms of the association's constitution and the specific wording of the resolution in question. The judges analysed the meaning and effect of the conclusive evidence provision, which stipulated that certain records or documents were to be taken as conclusive proof of the matters they contained. The Court ultimately found no error in the primary judge's findings and upheld their interpretation of the resolution and the constitutional provision.

The appeal was dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondent.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal dismissed with costs

[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.