NASA v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs

CONTI J Grounds The appellant’s submissions on appeal In other cases, it will be for the Full Court to determine whether it is expedient in the interests of justice that the issue should be argued and decided First so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence propounded by the appellant Second so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence Third so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence Fourth so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence Fifth so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence Sixth so-called mistake and misrepresentation of the evidence Seventh so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence Eighth so-called ‘mistake and misrepresentation’ of the evidence Appellant’s submissions on the conduct of the Tribunal Member The Minister’s case in summary by way of response My concluding consideration of the respective submissions of the parties