SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
McAndrew v AAI Limited [2013] QSC 290
PARTIES:
TROY ROBERT McANDREW
(plaintiff)
v
AAI LIMITED
ABN 48 005 297 807
(defendant)
FILE NO/S:
Rockhampton 254 of 2012
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
Trial
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Rockhampton
DELIVERED ON:
25 October 2013
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
24, 25, 26 September 2013. Final submissions received 23 October 2013
JUDGE:
McMeekin J
ORDER:
Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,420,209.60
CATCHWORDS:
TORTS – NEGLIGENCE – CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE – where the plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident – where liability is admitted – whether there should be an apportionment for contributory negligence
DAMAGES – MEASURE AND REMOTENESS OF DAMAGES IN ACTIONS FOR TORT - MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – where damages are assessed under the Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) – where past and future economic loss are assessed – where the plaintiff’s capacity to perform work is adversely affected - where degeneration from the injury is to be taken into consideration - where gratuitous care and domestic assistance assessed – where appropriate home modifications discussed - whether the extent of such modifications are necessary – whether costs for future surgery should be allowed
Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld)
Civil Liability Regulation 2003 (Qld)
Evidence Act 1977
Turner v Bulletin Newspaper Co Pty Ltd (1974) 3 ALR 491
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999
Alldridge v Mulcahey (1950) 81 CLR 337 cited
Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Swainson [2011] QCA 136 cited
Allwood v Wilson & Anor [2011] QSC 180 cited
Balnaves v Smith& Anor [2012] QSC 192 cited
Batchelor v Burke (1981) 148 CLR 448 cited
Bradburn v Great Western Railway Co (1874) LR 10 Exch 1 cited
CSR Ltd v Eddy (2005) 226 CLR 1 cited
Cullen v Trappell (1980) 146 CLR 1 cited
Gamser v Nominal Defendant (1977) 13 ALR 387 cited
Griffin v Lee Brown [2000] QSC 299 cited
Griffiths v Kerkemeyer (1977) 139 CLR 161 cited
Heywood v Commercial Electrical Pty Ltd [2013] QCA 270 cited
Johns v Cosgrove 27 MVR 110 cited
Munzer v Johnston & Anor [2009] QCA 190 cited
National Insurance Co of New Zealand Ltd v Espagne (1961) 105 CLR 569 cited
Re Mann and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy [2001] AATA 821 cited
Redding v Lee (1983) 151 CLR 117 cited
Sharman v Evans (1977) 138 CLR 563 cited
Shaw v Menzies and Anor [2011] QCA 197 cited
Skelton v Collins (1966) 115 CLR 94 cited
State of New South Wales v Davies (1998) 43 NSWLR 182 cited
Van Gervan v Fenton (1992) 175 CLR 327 cited
Wann v Fire and All Risks Insurance Company Ltd [1990] 2 Qd R 596 cited
Wilson v McLeay (1961) 106 CLR 523 applied
Wolgast v Connolly’s News & Anor [2008] QSC 97 followed
Wynn v NSW Insurance Ministerial Corporation (1995) 184 CLR 485 cited
COUNSEL:
Mr GC O’Driscoll for the Plaintiff
Mr GF Crow QC with him Mr Arnold for…
Continue reading McAndrew v AAI Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- McAndrew v AAI Limited [2013] QSC 290
- Case
- [2013] QSC 290
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that McAndrew was not contributorily negligent, and thus no apportionment for contributory negligence was required. Regarding the assessment of damages, the court determined that McAndrew’s capacity to perform work was adversely affected by the injuries, warranting compensation for both past and future economic loss. The court also considered degeneration from the injury and determined it should be factored into the damages assessment. The court further found that McAndrew required gratuitous care and domestic assistance, and that appropriate home modifications were necessary, though not all proposed modifications were deemed essential. Finally, the court allowed for the cost of future surgery, finding it appropriate given the nature and severity of McAndrew’s injuries.
In summary, the court awarded damages to McAndrew in the amount of $1,420,209.60. This judgment reflects the court’s comprehensive assessment of the plaintiff’s injuries, the impact on her ability to work, and the necessity of various forms of care and modifications. The court’s decision underscores the importance of a detailed and tailored approach to damages assessment in personal injury cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,420,209.60
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.