Markert v Struber & Anor

Case [2017] QLC 62


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Markert v Struber & Anor [2017] QLC 62
PARTIES:

Frank Josef Markert

(applicant)

v

Stephen Roy Struber and Dianne Rose Wilson-Struber

(respondents)

FILE NO:

MRA283-17

DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for renewal of mining lease.
DELIVERED ON: 22 December 2017
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 5 December 2017
HEARD AT: Heard on the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR:

GJ Smith

ORDERS:

1.   In respect of ML 20238 compensation is determined in the total sum of $418 per annum.

2.   The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland the amount set out in order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – renewal – referral – determination of   compensation – absence of evidence or submissions – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989 s 279A, s 281(1)

Public Trustee Act 1978
Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76
Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297

APPEARANCES: Not applicable.
  1. This matter relates to a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 279A of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the renewal of Mining Lease 20238 (ML 20238) for a period of 5 years.

Background

  1. The applicant, Frank Josef Markert (the miner) seeks the renewal of ML 20238, which is situated on land described as Lot 14 on SP 250040 (the subject land).  The relevant areas comprise a mining area of 34.40 ha and an access track of 5.15 ha. The subject land is owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). 

  1. The subject land is used for grazing purposes and is located within the Cook Shire Local Government area.

Relevant legislation

  1. Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court.  In respect to the present referral concerning ML 20238, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM.

  1. Section 281 of the MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of land is entitled to compensation for:

“(i)     deprivation of possession of the surface of land of the owner;

(ii) diminution of the value of the land of the owner or any improvements thereon;

(iii)diminution of the use made or which may be made of the land of the owner or any improvements thereon;

(iv)severance of any part of the land from other parts thereof or from other land of the owner;

Continue reading Markert v Struber & Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Markert v Struber & Anor [2017] QLC 62
Case
[2017] QLC 62
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Markert v Struber & Anor involved a dispute over the renewal of a mining lease, specifically ML 20238. The applicant, Markert, sought compensation for the renewal of the mining lease from the respondents, Struber and the Public Trustee of Queensland. The matter was heard in the Queensland Land Court.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of compensation for the renewal of the mining lease, ML 20238, in the absence of any evidence or submissions on the matter. The court had to consider whether it could rely on previous judgments and determinations to calculate the compensation. The court was also required to decide on the use of previous court judgments for the purpose of determining compensation, given the lack of evidence or submissions from the parties.

In resolving the matter, the court found that the absence of evidence or submissions from the parties did not prevent it from making a determination. The court relied on previous judgments and determinations, including the case of Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland, to establish a basis for compensation. The court determined that the compensation for the renewal of ML 20238 should be set at $418 per annum. The court further ordered that the applicant must pay the compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland within one month from the notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

The final orders of the court were that the compensation for the renewal of ML 20238 should be $418 per annum and that the applicant should pay the compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland within the specified timeframe.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 20238 compensation is determined in the total sum of $418 per annum.

2. The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland the amount set out in order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.