Markert v Struber & Anor

Case [2018] QLC 44


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Markert v Struber & Anor [2018] QLC 44
PARTIES: Frank Joseph Markert
(applicant)
v

Stephen Roy Struber
(respondent)

Dianne Rose Wilson-Struber
(respondent)

FILE NO: MRA369-18
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for renewal of mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 30 November 2018
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 16 November 2018
HEARD AT: On the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith
ORDERS:

1.   In respect of ML 20314 compensation is determined in the total sum of $590 per annum.

2.   The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in Order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – renewal – determination of compensation – absence of evidence or submissions – referral documents – mining district – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989, s 279, s 279A, s 281(1),s 281(3)(a)
Public Trustee Act 1978 part 7
Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76
Markert v Struber & Anor [2017] QLC 62
Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297

APPEARANCES: Not applicable
  1. This matter involves a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) pursuant to s 279A of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the renewal of Mining Lease (ML) 20314.

  2. The address for service for the respondents is listed on the coversheet of the referral document as:

    C/- The Queensland Public Trustee
    PO BOX 656

    CAIRNS QLD 4870

Background

  1. The applicant, Frank Joseph Markert (the miner) seeks the renewal of ML 20314 on land commonly known as Palmerville Station which is owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). The land which is more particularly described as Lot 14 on SP250040 is located within the Cook Shire local government area and is used for grazing purposes.

  2. The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows: 

Court Reference Tenure ID Areas[1] Term Mineral
MRA369-18 ML 20314

 Mining – 48 ha

 Access – 9.9 ha

10 years Gold

[1]Areas as per DNRME referral documents.

Relevant legislation

  1. Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court.

  1. Section 281 of the MRA identifies the factors which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. Specifically, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of land is entitled to compensation for the following:

    “(i)     deprivation of possession of the surface of land of the owner;

    (ii) diminution of the value…

Continue reading Markert v Struber & Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Markert v Struber & Anor [2018] QLC 44
Case
[2018] QLC 44
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Markert v Struber & Anor involved the applicant seeking compensation for the renewal of a mining lease in Queensland. The dispute arose as the applicant, Markert, contested the amount of compensation set by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy for the renewal of a mining lease over certain land. The matter was heard in the Queensland Land Court.

The primary legal issues before the court were the determination of the correct compensation amount for the mining lease renewal and whether the decision of the Department could be reviewed in the absence of evidence or submissions provided by the parties. The applicant argued that the compensation amount was inadequate, while the defendants contended that the compensation was appropriately calculated according to the statutory guidelines.

The court found that the compensation amount for the mining lease renewal should be determined based on the relevant statutory provisions and the referral documents provided to the court. In the absence of any submissions or evidence from the parties, the court relied on previous judgments and the statutory framework to arrive at a decision. The court determined that the compensation should be $590 per annum, reflecting the statutory guidelines and the nature of the mining lease. The applicant was ordered to pay this amount to the Public Trustee of Queensland within one month from the notification of the mining lease renewal and annually thereafter.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 20314 compensation is determined in the total sum of $590 per annum.

2. The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in Order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.