Markert v Struber & Anor

Case [2019] QLC 7


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Markert v Struber & Anor [2019] QLC 7
PARTIES: Frank Josef Markert
(applicant)
v

Stephen Roy Struber
(respondent)

Dianne Rose Wilson-Struber
(respondent)

FILE NO: MRA423-18
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for renewal of mining lease
DELIVERED ON: 19 February 2019
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD ON: Submissions closed 12 February 2019
HEARD AT: On the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR:

GJ Smith

ORDERS:

1.    In respect of ML 20553 compensation is determined in the total sum of $325 per annum.

2.    The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in Order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

MINING LEASE – renewal – determination of compensation – absence of evidence or submissions – referral documents – mining district – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989, s 279, s 279A, s 281(1), s 281(3)(a)
Public Trustee Act 1978 part 7

Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76, applied
Markert v Struber & Anor [2017] QLC 62, applied
Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23, applied

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297, applied

APPEARANCES: Not applicable
  1. This proceeding concerns a referral by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) pursuant to s 279A of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation by the Court for the renewal of Mining Lease 20553 (ML 20553). 

Background

  1. The applicant, Mr Frank Josef Markert (the miner) seeks the renewal of ML 20553 which is situated within the Cook Shire local government area on land known as Palmerville Station, but more particularly described as Lot 14 on SP 250040. Palmerville Station is owned by the respondents and has been used for grazing purposes for many years.

  1. The Court reference and relevant tenure details are set out below:  

Court File No. Tenure ID Mining Area Access Term Lease Purpose
MRA423-18 ML 20553 24.1659 ha 8.04 ha 10 years Camp, Plant, Gold, Silver.

Relevant legislation

  1. Section 279 of the MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court.  In respect to the present referral concerning ML 20553, no agreement has been lodged with DNRME.

  1. Section 281 of the MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of land is entitled to compensation for:

“(i)     deprivation of possession of the surface of land of the owner;

(ii) diminution of the value of the land of the owner or any improvements thereon;

(iii)diminution of the use made or…

Continue reading Markert v Struber & Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Markert v Struber & Anor [2019] QLC 7
Case
[2019] QLC 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Markert v Struber & Anor, the applicant sought a determination of compensation for the renewal of a mining lease. The dispute arose in the context of the Queensland Mineral and Coal Mining Act 1998, where the applicant, Markert, was the lessor of the land subject to the mining lease, and the respondents, Struber and another, were the lessees. The application was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the applicant had provided sufficient evidence or submissions to support the compensation claim and the appropriate use of prior court judgments to determine the compensation amount. The court was tasked with interpreting the relevant statutory provisions and assessing the sufficiency of the applicant's submissions in light of the statutory requirements.

The court examined the submissions made by the applicant and found them lacking in detail and substantiation. The applicant did not provide any evidence or submissions to support the compensation amount claimed. The court noted that the absence of evidence or submissions made it difficult to ascertain the basis on which the applicant had arrived at the compensation figure. Furthermore, the court held that the applicant's reliance on prior court judgments was not sufficient to establish a proper basis for the compensation determination. The court ultimately found that the compensation should be determined based on the mining district's specific circumstances and the relevant statutory provisions.

The court determined the compensation amount for the mining lease renewal to be $325 per annum. The applicant was ordered to pay this amount to the Public Trustee of Queensland within one month from the notification of the lease renewal by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the lease renewal.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 20553 compensation is determined in the total sum of $325 per annum.

2. The applicant pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland in the amount set out in Order 1 within one month from notification of the renewal of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.