Mansfield and Mansfield and Ors (No.3)

Link copied
Case Copied 44 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MANSFIELD & MANSFIELD & ORS (No.3) [2018] FCCA 970
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Property proceedings – wife seeks joinder of third parties – third parties to be joined appointor, corporate trustees and trustees of discretionary trusts established by husband’s father – third parties seek summary dismissal of wife’s claim against them – wife seeks orders setting aside instruments executed by corporate trustee – husband formerly director of trustee company – wife seeks setting aside of appointor of trust and husband’s directorship – nature of section 106B – principles to be applied to joinder – nature of summary jurisdiction application – analysis of husband’s degree of control over trusts in question – matrimonial property – matters to be considered.

Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975, ss.4, 75(2)(o), 78, 79, 80, 106, 114, 118

Federal Circuit Court Rules, rr.4.05, 11.01, 11.04, 13.10
Stamp Duties Act 1923 (SA), s.71CC
Federal Court Act 1976, s.31A

Cases cited:
Mansfield & Mansfield [2016] FCCA 2233
Mansfield & Mansfield [2017] FCCA 13
Rana v University of South Australia (2004) 136 FCR 344
Kennon v Spry (2008) FLC 93-388
In the Marriage of Davidson (No 2) (1990) FLC 92 -197
In the Marriage of Ashton (1986) FLC 91-777
In the Marriage of Gould (1993) 17 Fam LR 156
Choate v Choate [2009] FamCA 525
Ascot Investments Pty Ltd v Harper (1981) 148 CLR 337
Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27
Mansfield & Mansfield (No 2) [2017] FCCA 1117
Simic & Norton [2017] FamCA 1007
Diem & Vho and Ors [2016] FamCA 680
McKellar v Container Terminal Manager Services Limited (1999) 165 ALR 400
Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62
Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598
Lindon v The Commonwealth (No 2) (1996) 70 ALJR 541
Bigg v Suzi (1998) FLC 92-799
Przbylowski v Australian Human Rights Commission (No 2) [2018] FCA 473
Australian Securities and Investment Commission v Cassimatis (2013) 220 FCR 256
Youghanns & Ors v Youghanns & Ors (1999) FLC 92-836
In the Marriage of Pflugradt (1982) 7 Fam LR 188
Anison v Anison [2015] FamCA 973
B Pty Ltd and Ors & K and Anor (2008) FLC 93-802
Applicant: MS MANSFIELD
First Respondent: MR MANSFIELD
Second Respondent: MR MANSFIELD SENIOR
Third Respondent: MS MACRI
Fourth Respondent: COMPANY 1 PTY LTD
Fifth Respondent: TRUST A
Sixth Respondent: MR MANSFIELD SENIOR FAMILY TRUST
Seventh Respondent: TRUST C
Eighth Respondent: COMPANY 2 PTY LTD
File Number: ADC 4119 of 2014
Judgment of: Judge Brown
Hearing date: 27 November 2017 & 30 January 2018
Date of Last Submission: 30 January 2018
Delivered at: Adelaide
Delivered on: 2 May 2018

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Lindsay and Mr Jordan
Solicitors for the Applicant: Jacqui Ion Lawyers
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr Weil
Solicitors for the First Respondent: Scanlan Carroll Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Second, Third, Fourth & Fifth Respondents: Mr Abbott SC
Solicitors for the Second, Third, Fourth & Eighth…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Mansfield and Mansfield and Ors (No.3) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FCCA 970
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Mansfield and Mansfield and Ors (No.3)*, heard before Judge Brown, the wife sought to join additional parties, including Mr Mansfield Senior, Ms Macri, Company 1 Pty Ltd, and Company 2 Pty Ltd, to existing proceedings. The wife also sought to join Trust A and Trust C to the proceedings and had made claims against Mr Mansfield Senior, Ms Macri, Company 1 Pty Ltd, and Company 2 Pty Ltd. The proceedings involved the removal of Trust A, Trust C, and the Mr Mansfield Senior Family Trust as parties.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the wife's applications to join the additional parties and to maintain her claims against them should be granted, and whether the trusts should be removed as parties to the proceedings. The court was required to determine the appropriate course of action regarding the joinder of third parties and the continued involvement of the trusts in the litigation.

Judge Brown dismissed the wife's application to join Mr Mansfield Senior, Ms Macri, Company 1 Pty Ltd, and Company 2 Pty Ltd as parties to the proceedings. Consequently, the wife's claims against these respondents were also dismissed. Furthermore, the court ordered that the joinder of Trust A and Trust C be discharged and that Trust A, Trust C, and the Mr Mansfield Senior Family Trust be removed as parties to the proceedings. The court then directed the second, third, fourth, and eighth respondents to file written submissions and supporting affidavits regarding costs within twenty-eight days, with the applicant wife to file any responsive submissions and affidavits within a further twenty-eight days. Further consideration of the matter was adjourned.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The wife’s application to join Mr Mansfield Senior, Ms Macri, Company 1 Pty Ltd and Company 2 Pty Ltd as parties to these proceedings is dismissed.

2.

The wife’s joinder of the Trust A and the Trust C is discharged.

3.

The wife’s claim against the second respondent Mr Mansfield Senior, the third respondent Ms Macri, the fourth respondent Company 1 Pty Ltd and the eighth respondent Company 2 Pty Ltd is dismissed.

4.

The fifth named respondent the Trust A, the sixth named respondent Mr Mansfield Senior Family Trust and the seventh named respondent Trust C be removed as parties.

5.

The second, third, fourth and eighth respondent are to provide written submissions in relation to costs and any necessary affidavit in support of such application is to be filed within twenty eight days of today’s date

6.

The applicant wife is to file any written submissions in response to such application and any necessary supporting affidavit within a further twenty eight days of that.

7.

Further consideration of the matter is adjourned to 19 July 2018 at 9:30am.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.