FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| LHMU v ACHIEVE CLEANING SERVICES PTY LTD | [2010] FMCA 362 |
| INDUSTRIAL LAW – Wilful breach of Workplace Relations Act – appointment of bargaining agent pursuant to s335 WRA – penalty – matters relevant to quantum of penalty. |
| Workplace Relations Act1996 (Cth) |
| Amos v Brisbane City Council [2005] QCA 443 Barnard John Cooper v Director Liquor Licensing [1999] WASCA 1021 Beckwith v R (1976) 135 CLR 569 CF Finance Sector Union v Commonwealth of Australia (2005) 47 IR 462 Chew v R (1992) 173 CLR 626 Dickinson v Fletcher (1873) LR 9 CP 1 Krakouer v R (1998) 194 CLR 202 Murphy v Farmer (1988) 165 CLR 19 National Tertiary Education Industry Union v Central Queensland University [2008] FCA 481 R v Adams (1935) 53 CLR 563 at 567 – 568 R v Crabbe (1985) 156 CLR 464 Re HPC Productions Ltd [1962] 1 CH 466 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129 Rojos v Esselte Australia Pty Ltd (No.2) [2008] FCA 1585 Tabe v R (2005) 79 ALJR 1890 Trade Practices Commission v TNT Management Pty Ltd (1985) 6 FCR 1 |
| Applicant: | LIQUOR HOSPITALITY & MISCELLANEOUS UNION |
| Respondent: | ACHIEVE CLEANIING SERVICES PTY LTD |
| File Number: | BRG 168 of 2009 |
| Judgment of: | Burnett FM |
| Hearing date: | 12 June 2009 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 24 June 2009 |
| Delivered at: | Brisbane |
| Delivered on: | 26 May 2010 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Reed |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Coveney |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | HWL Ebsworth |
ORDERS
That pursuant to section 407(1) and section 407(2)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act the respondent pay a pecuniary penalty fixed in the sum of $11,000.00 for contravention of section 335(3) of the Workplace Relations Act.
That pursuant to section 841 of the Workplace Relations Act the penalty imposed on the respondent pursuant to Order 1 herein be paid to the applicant.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
BRG 168 of 2009
| LIQUOR HOSPITALITY & MISCELLANEOUS UNION |
Applicant
And
| ACHIEVE CLEANING SERVICES PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
In late 2008 Achieve Cleaning Services Pty Ltd (Achieve) was proposing a new Employee Collective Agreement (ECA) for its employees many of whom were employed at the Anglo Coal Mine at Moura, Central Queensland. One of Achieve’s employees was Peter Sawyer. He had commenced employment with Achieve in about July or August 2008 and was employed as a cleaner on a casual basis. On 14 November 2008 he joined the applicant, Liquor Hospitality & Miscellaneous Union (LHMU) and from around that time acted as the LHMU delegate at the mine.
In early 2008 Mr Sawyer became aware that Achieve was proposing a new ECA. On 9 December he contacted Ben Jones (Jones), an LHMU official, and requested of Jones that the LHMU act as Mr Sawyer’s bargaining agent in relation to the proposed ECA. Jones acknowledged and accepted that request.
On 10 December 2008 Jones caused a letter…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read LHMU v Achieve Cleaning Services Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2010] FMCA 362
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the respondent had breached section 335(3) of the Workplace Relations Act by not ensuring that it paid its employees their wages and superannuation in full and on time. The court was required to determine if the evidence presented demonstrated a clear contravention of the act and whether the penalty imposed was appropriate and in line with the act's provisions.
The court found that the respondent had indeed contravened section 335(3) of the Workplace Relations Act, as the evidence showed that employees were not paid their wages and superannuation correctly. The court considered the nature of the contravention, the respondent's conduct, and the need for deterrence and compliance with the act. The court concluded that a pecuniary penalty of $11,000 was appropriate and ordered the penalty to be paid to the applicant, the LHMU, as per section 841 of the Workplace Relations Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That pursuant to section 407(1) and section 407(2)(b) of the Workplace Relations Act the respondent pay a pecuniary penalty fixed in the sum of $11,000.00 for contravention of section 335(3) of the Workplace Relations Act.
2.
That pursuant to section 841 of the Workplace Relations Act the penalty imposed on the respondent pursuant to Order 1 herein be paid to the applicant.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.