Johnson v George

Case [2018] QSC 140


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Johnson v George [2018] QSC 140
PARTIES: TREVOR BAINES JOHNSON
(applicant)
v
CHRISTINE GEORGE
(respondent)
FILE NO/S:  SC No 451 of 2018
DIVISION:  Trial Division
PROCEEDING:  Application

ORIGINATING

COURT: 

Supreme Court at Townsville 
DELIVERED ON:  14 June 2018
DELIVERED AT:  Townsville
HEARING DATE:  12 June 2018
JUDGE:  North J
ORDERS: 

1. Pursuant to section 6 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld);

a)   The body of Arthur Charles Johnson (the deceased) be released to the Applicant, Trevor Baines Johnson, for the purpose of a funeral at Townsville and subsequent burial at Charters Towers, Queensland; and

b)   The Applicant be responsible for the arrangements for the funeral and burial but it is directed that the body of the deceased be present at the funeral.

2.    The Applicant be entitled to withdraw from bank account number 41624998 held in the name of Arthur Charles Johnson or “A C Johnson” with the Queensland Country Credit Union the sum of $8,000.00 for the purpose of paying the funeral expenses of Arthur Charles Johnson and that the Applicant repay to the said account any part of the sum of $8,000.00 which is not genuinely incurred in relation to those funeral expenses.

3.    The Applicant be entitled to withdraw from bank account number 41624998 held in the name of Arthur Charles Johnson or “A C Johnson” with the Queensland Country Credit Union the sum of $304.70 to reimburse himself for filing fees paid to the Supreme Court of Queensland on account of filing fees in this proceeding.

4.    Otherwise, there be no order as to costs.

CATCHWORDS:

SUCCESSION – PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES – RIGHTS, POWERS AND DUTIES – DISPOSAL OF BODY – burial rights – dispute between siblings – significance of Aboriginal cultural, spiritual and religious reliefs – ascertaining relevant circumstances

ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER PEOPLES – OTHER MATTERS – burial rights – significance of Aboriginal cultural, spiritual and religious reliefs

LEGISLATION:

Succession Act 1981 (Qld), s 6

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r 610

CASES:

Darcy v Duckett [2016] NSWSC 1756, applied

Doherty v Doherty & Anor [2006] QSC 257, cited

Frith v Schubert & Anor [2010] QSC 444, cited

Jones v Dodd [1999] SASC 125, cited

Keller v Keller (2007) 15 VR 667, cited

Laing v Laing [2014] QSC 194, cited

Roma v Ketchup [2009] QSC 442, cited

South Australia v Smith [2014] SASC 64, applied

Tufala v Marsden & Anor [2011] QSC 222, cited

Ugle v Bowra & O’Dea & Anor [2007] WASC 82, cited

COUNSEL:

M Jones for the applicant, appearing pro bono

The respondent appeared in person

SOLICITORS:

Direct access brief for the applicant

Introduction

  1. NORTH J: The applicant seeks orders pursuant to s 6 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld) that the body of his father[1] be released to him for the purposes of funeral and subsequent burial at Charters Towers, Queensland. The applicant also seeks an order entitling him to withdraw a sum of…

Continue reading Johnson v George

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Johnson v George [2018] QSC 140
Case
[2018] QSC 140
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Johnson v George involved a dispute between siblings over the burial of Arthur Charles Johnson, an Aboriginal man. Trevor Baines Johnson, the applicant, sought to bury his brother's body in accordance with Aboriginal cultural, spiritual, and religious beliefs. The respondent, George, opposed the burial at the requested location. The matter was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland.

The primary legal issue was whether the applicant had the right to bury the deceased in a manner consistent with Aboriginal cultural, spiritual, and religious beliefs. The court had to determine the significance of these beliefs in ascertaining the relevant circumstances and the wishes of the deceased. Additionally, the court needed to consider the applicant's entitlement to withdraw funds from the deceased's bank account to cover funeral expenses.

The court found that the applicant was entitled to bury the deceased in accordance with Aboriginal cultural, spiritual, and religious beliefs. The court acknowledged the importance of these beliefs in ascertaining the relevant circumstances and the wishes of the deceased. The court also granted the applicant's request to withdraw funds from the deceased's bank account to cover funeral expenses, subject to the applicant repaying any unexpended amount. The court did not make any orders as to costs.

In summary, the court ruled in favour of the applicant, Trevor Baines Johnson, allowing him to bury his brother in accordance with Aboriginal cultural, spiritual, and religious beliefs. The court also granted the applicant's request to withdraw funds from the deceased's bank account to cover funeral expenses, subject to certain conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to section 6 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld);

a) The body of Arthur Charles Johnson (the deceased) be released to the Applicant, Trevor Baines Johnson, for the purpose of a funeral at Townsville and subsequent burial at Charters Towers, Queensland; and

b) The Applicant be responsible for the arrangements for the funeral and burial but it is directed that the body of the deceased be present at the funeral.

2. The Applicant be entitled to withdraw from bank account number 41624998 held in the name of Arthur Charles Johnson or “A C Johnson” with the Queensland Country Credit Union the sum of $8,000.00 for the purpose of paying the funeral expenses of Arthur Charles Johnson and that the Applicant repay to the said account any part of the sum of $8,000.00 which is not genuinely incurred in relation to those funeral expenses.

3. The Applicant be entitled to withdraw from bank account number 41624998 held in the name of Arthur Charles Johnson or “A C Johnson” with the Queensland Country Credit Union the sum of $304.70 to reimburse himself for filing fees paid to the Supreme Court of Queensland on account of filing fees in this proceeding.

4. Otherwise, there be no order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.