DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
| CITATION: | JMR obo SRR v Hornsby [2009] QDC 147 |
| PARTIES: | JMR (LITIGATION GUARDIAN) on behalf of SRR (applicant) v PAUL WILLIAM HORNSBY (respondent) |
| FILE NO/S: | 4/09 |
| DIVISION: | Civil |
| PROCEEDING: | Application for criminal compensation |
| ORIGINATING | |
| COURT: | Kingaroy |
| DELIVERED ON: | 5 June 2009 |
| DELIVERED AT: | Beenleigh |
| HEARING DATE: | 1 June 2009 |
| JUDGE: | Dearden DCJ |
| ORDER: | 1. That the respondent Paul William Hornsby pay the applicant JMR on behalf of SRR the sum of $26,500. |
| judgment awarded be paid over to JMR as trustee for | |
| 2. That any monies that are paid in relation to the of this application to the solicitors for the applicant, Kelly Frecklington, Solicitors of 44 King Street, Kingaroy, Queensland 4610, a bill in taxable form being sufficient in relation to the amount of taxed costs payable under this order for the purposes of JMR paying out such amount. | |
| 3. That JMR pay the medical expenses of the psychologist Dr Kirsten Hunter in providing her report in relation to this matter on presentation to JMR of a tax invoice. | |
| 4. That JMR be appointed manager of and to take possession of and control and manage the residue of the said judgment sum of the applicant with powers and duties as defined in the Public Trustee Act 1978 until SRR turns 18 on 15 November 2014, and that JMR apply the same and the income in such manner as JMR thinks fit for the maintenance, education, medical treatment and counselling and otherwise for the benefit of SRR. | |
| CATCHWORDS: | Application – criminal compensation – rape – mental or nervous shock – adverse impacts |
| LEGISLATION: | Criminal Offence Victims Act (Qld) 1995 ss 20, 22(4), 24, 25, 26 |
| CASES: | R v Ward; ex parte Dooley [2001] 2 Qd R 436 Riddle v Coffey [2002] 133 A Crim R 220; [2002] QCA 337 R v Attwell; ex parte Jullie [2002] 2 Qd R 367 Wren v Gaulai [2008] QCA 148 R v Kazakoff; ex parte Ferguson [2001] 2 Qd R 320 Griven v Yeatman [2001] QDC 213 Livingstone v Yeatman [2001] QDC 216 RKL v Laycock [2007] QDC 348 |
| COUNSEL: | Mr S A Lynch for the applicant No appearance for the respondent |
| SOLICITORS: | Kelly Frecklington Solicitors for the applicant No appearance for the respondent |
Introduction
The respondent, Paul William Hornsby, pleaded guilty in the District Court, Kingaroy before me on 22 March 2007 to two counts of rape in respect of the complainant SRR. The respondent was sentenced to two years and eight months imprisonment suspended after serving eight months, with an operational period of three years.
Facts
These proceedings are brought by the applicant, JMR as litigation guardian for the complainant, who is a child. The complainant was born on 15 November 1996.
The following facts relate to Count 2 on the indictment. In June 2006, the Kumbia SES Service hosted an event involving trail bike riding at Kumbia. The complainant and her parents attended that event. Both the complainant’s parents as well as the respondent were involved…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read JMR obo SRR v Hornsby and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2009] QDC 147
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that SRR had indeed suffered mental or nervous shock as a result of the rape, which had a significant adverse impact on her health. The court noted that SRR had experienced severe anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, which had resulted in significant disruptions to her daily life, including difficulties with relationships, work, and social activities. The court also found that SRR had suffered significant ongoing harm as a result of the rape, which had a profound and lasting impact on her health and wellbeing. The court noted that SRR's mental health issues were severe and had resulted in significant disruptions to her daily life, including difficulties with relationships, work, and social activities.
The court held that the applicant was entitled to compensation for the harm suffered by SRR as a result of the rape. The court noted that the harm suffered by SRR was significant and ongoing, and that it had a profound and lasting impact on her health and wellbeing. The court ordered that the respondent pay the applicant the sum of $26,500 in compensation for the harm suffered by SRR. The court noted that this amount was appropriate and reflected the severity and ongoing nature of SRR's mental health issues. The court also noted that the compensation was intended to assist SRR in managing her ongoing mental health issues and to provide some measure of redress for the harm suffered as a result of the rape.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. That the respondent Paul William Hornsby pay the
applicant JMR on behalf of SRR the sum of $26,500.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.