FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hooke v Bux Global Limited [2018] FCA 740
File number: WAD 644 of 2017 Judge: COLVIN J Date of judgment: 17 May 2018 Date of publication of reasons: 23 May 2018 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - winding up application - application for summary judgment on basis that plaintiffs do not have standing - where plaintiffs are registered holders of shares - where plaintiffs investment resulted in shareholding without agreement or knowledge - whether plaintiffs are contributories - standing as contributory - whether 'a holder of fully paid shares' to be given natural meaning - whether plaintiffs should be permitted to seek standing in the same proceedings as application for winding up - application for summary judgment dismissed. Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 461, 462
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 41.04
Cases cited: Treadtel International Pty Ltd v Cocco [2016] NSWCA 360; (2016) 316 FLR 318 Date of hearing: 17 May 2018 Registry: Western Australia Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 28 Counsel for the Plaintiffs: Mr DJ Jackson SC & Mr SJ Penrose Solicitor for the Plaintiffs: Tottle Partners Counsel for the Defendant: Mr AP Young QC & Mr PH Murray Solicitor for the Defendant: K&L Gates ORDERS
WAD 644 of 2017 BETWEEN: PETER JAMES HOOKE & CLAIRE ELIZABETH HOOKE
First Plaintiff
PETER JAMES HOOKE & BRICE JAMES HOOKE AS TRUSTEES FOR THE HOOKE SUPERANNUATION FUND
Second Plaintiff
AND: BUX GLOBAL LIMITED (ACN 613 313 616)
Defendant
JUDGE:
COLVIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
17 MAY 2018
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The application for summary judgment is dismissed.
2.The costs of the application be costs in the cause.
3.On the applications for discovery and the question of inspection of documents produced on subpoena by the Commonwealth Bank and the ANZ Bank:
(a)the plaintiffs do file and serve written submissions by 17 May 2018;
(b)the defendant do file and serve written submissions in response by 24 May 2018; and
(c)the issues be determined on the papers.
4.The plaintiffs do deliver any proposed amended concise statement by 23 May 2018.
5.The matter be otherwise adjourned for a case management hearing on 1 June 2018 at 9.30 am
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
COLVIN J:
The plaintiffs seek orders for the winding up of Bux Global Limited (Bux). In their concise statement, they claim they have been 'purportedly issued shares', but they did not apply for shares in Bux and did not participate in any transaction by which their shares in a company Bux.com Global Limited (Bux.com) might be exchanged for shares in Bux. As a result, they accept they do not meet the definition of member in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
There is evidence before me that the plaintiffs were added to the register of shareholders of Bux and issued with holding certificates. Despite this,…
Continue reading Hooke v Bux Global Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Hooke v Bux Global Limited [2018] FCA 740
- Case
- [2018] FCA 740
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court dismissed the application for summary judgment, finding that the plaintiffs were indeed contributories of the company and thus had standing to bring the winding up application. The court held that the term "a holder of fully paid shares" should be given its natural meaning and that the plaintiffs, as registered holders of shares, were contributories. The court also found that the plaintiffs should not be prevented from seeking standing in the same proceedings as the winding up application. The court further ordered that the plaintiffs file written submissions on the discovery and inspection of documents produced on subpoena by the Commonwealth Bank and the ANZ Bank, and that the matter be adjourned for a case management hearing.
The court ordered that the costs of the application be costs in the cause, and that the plaintiffs file any proposed amended concise statement by a specified date. The court also directed that the parties file written submissions on the discovery and inspection of documents produced on subpoena by the Commonwealth Bank and the ANZ Bank, and that the issues be determined on the papers. The matter was adjourned for a case management hearing on a specified date. The entry of orders was dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The application for summary judgment is dismissed.
2. The costs of the application be costs in the cause.
3. On the applications for discovery and the question of inspection of documents produced on subpoena by the Commonwealth Bank and the ANZ Bank:
(a) the plaintiffs do file and serve written submissions by 17 May 2018;
(b) the defendant do file and serve written submissions in response by 24 May 2018; and
(c) the issues be determined on the papers.
4. The plaintiffs do deliver any proposed amended concise statement by 23 May 2018.
5. The matter be otherwise adjourned for a case management hearing on 1 June 2018 at 9.30 am
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.