QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION: Greer & Anor v Mt Cotton Constructions Pty Ltd [2018] QCATA 196 PARTIES: DAMIEN GREER
(first appellant)
KATE GREER
(second appellant)
v MT COTTON CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD
(respondent)
APPLICATION NO: APL044-17 ORIGINATING APPLICATION NO: BDL190-14
MATTER TYPE: Appeals DELIVERED ON: 21 November 2018 HEARING DATE: 22 August 2017 HEARD AT: Brisbane DECISION OF: Senior Member Brown
Member Burke
ORDERS: 1. Appeal allowed.
2. The decision dated 17 January 2017 in BDL190-14 is set aside.
3. The matter is returned to the Tribunal for rehearing according to law and in accordance with these reasons.
4. The parties must file and exchange any submissions on the costs of the appeal within fourteen (14) days and any submissions in reply within seven (7) days thereafter.
CATCHWORDS: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – RIGHT OF APPEAL – WHEN APPEAL LIES – ERROR OF LAW – WHAT IS – GENERALLY –
where question of law – whether tribunal erred in assessing owners entitlement to damages on the basis of the value of variations not complying with Part 7 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld)
STATUTES – ACTS OF PARLIAMENT – INTERPRETATION – GENERAL APPROACHES TO INTERPRETATION
CONTRACTS – BUILDING, ENGINEERING AND RELATED CONTRACTS – PERFORMANCE OF
WORK – GENERAL – Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) – where contractual variations – where variations did not comply with Part 7 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) – where no application to QCAT for approval to recover amounts for non- compliant variations – where tribunal at first instance found assessment of owners’ entitlement to damages required non-compliant variation works to be valued – whether tribunal erred in assessing owners’ entitlement to damages – purpose of Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) – purpose of Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld) – whether s 84 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) abrogates entitlement of a builder to retain monies paid by an owner for non-compliant variations
Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 14A
Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) (repealed), s 3, s 6, s 6(2), s 6(5), s 7, s 7(1), s 16, s 16(1), s 64, s 65, s
66, s67, s 69, s 72(2)(b), s 79, s 80, s 81, s 82, s 83, s
83(1)(b), s 84, s 84(2), s 84(2)(a), s 84(3), s 84(3)(a)(i), s
84(4), s 84(4)(a)(i), s 84(4)(a)(ii), s 84(6), s 84(7), s 92, s
93(1)
Queensland Building Construction and Commission Act
1991 (Qld), s 3, s 42, s 42(1), s 42(3), s 42(4), s 77, s 77(2),
s 77(3)(d), Schedule 1, s 62Queensland Building Services Authority Act 1991, s 42, s 42(3)
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009, s 115, s 115(1), s 116, s 116(2), s 142, s 142(1), s 142(3)(b),
s 147(1), s 147(2), s 147(3)
Allaro Homes Cairns Pty Ltd v O’Reilly & Anor [2012] QCA 286
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Greer & Anor v Mt Cotton Constructions Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2018] QCATA 196
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the tribunal had indeed erred in its assessment. The reasoning was grounded in the purpose of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) and the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld), which aim to protect homeowners from unfair practices by builders. The court held that section 84 of the Domestic Building Contracts Act 2000 (Qld) does not abrogate the builder's entitlement to retain monies paid for non-compliant variations. Therefore, the tribunal's approach to valuing the non-compliant variation works was inconsistent with the statutory framework. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the decision dated 17 January 2017 was set aside. The matter was returned to the tribunal for rehearing according to law and in line with the court's reasons.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Appeal allowed.
2. The decision dated 17 January 2017 in BDL190-14 is set aside.
3. The matter is returned to the Tribunal for rehearing according to law and in accordance with these reasons.
4. The parties must file and exchange any submissions on the costs of the appeal within fourteen (14) days and any submissions in reply within seven (7) days thereafter.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.