NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CITATION: GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES PTY LTD v LEGION TELECALL PTY LTD [2001] NSWCA 279
FILE NUMBER(S):
41036/99
HEARING DATE(S): 27, 28 March 2001
JUDGMENT DATE: 28/08/2001
PARTIES:
GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES PTY LTD v LEGION TELECALL PTY LTD
JUDGMENT OF: Mason P Meagher JA Beazley JA
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Supreme Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S):
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Rolfe J
COUNSEL:
Appellant: P L Brereton SC / M Meek
Respondent: W H Nicholas QC / J Stevenson
SOLICITORS:
Appellant: Michael Saunders & Associates
Respondent: Michell Sillar
CATCHWORDS:
Contract - Breach - Construction of term - psychic telephone services - contract between Service Bureau and Call Processing Centre to direct all calls through call processing centre - whether duty absolute or duty to use best endeavours - whether failure to secure third parties' business for call processing centre amounted to breach of term - Assessment of Damages. (ND)
LEGISLATION CITED:
DECISION:
Appeal and cross appeal dismissed with costs
JUDGMENT:
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 41036/99
MASON P
MEAGHER JA
BEAZLEY JATuesday 28 August 2001
GLOBAL NETWORK SERVICES PTY LTD v
LEGION TELECALL PTY LTD
This appeal involves a contract (the Contract) made between Global Network Services Pty Ltd (Global) and Legion Telecall Pty Ltd (Legion) on 30 November 1994. Both Global and Legion are part of the Telstra’s 190 InfoCall Services for psychic related services. In November 1994 Legion was arranging to become InfoCall’s Service Bureau for the 190 premium services providing psychic services. It was also setting itself up as a service provider under the name “Psychic Live” with five 190 telephone lines. Global also proposed to function as a service provider trading as “Psychic Hotline” (later “Psychic Express”). Through the Contract Legion engaged Global to operate the Call Processing Centre (CPC) for its “Psychic Live” services.
In clause 1(k) of the Contract, Legion agreed:
“to direct all 190 Psychic and Psychic-related call processing requests through Global’s Psychic Call Centre, with the exception of the current one-off Athena Starwoman – Woman’s Day Star Cards Promotion.”
Apart from Global and Legion, there were at least three others within the market of psychic service providers – Athena Starwoman, Mystic Meg and Suzanne Myles (the 190 Other lines). The 190 Other Lines needed to contract with Legion to obtain a 190 number. They would also need a CPC. Legion contracted with the three psychic service providers, but the 190 Other Lines chose not to use Global as their CPC.
The central question in the appeal is whether Legion’s failure to direct call requests to the Other 190 lines through Global constituted a breach of clause 1(k).
At trial, the parties agreed that 1,125,447 minutes of 190 Other Lines psychic and psychic-related calls were received by Legion and not directed to Global. Rolfe J found for Global on all issues of contract and breach. Clause 1(k) was not limited to the role that Global would play in the Psychic Live and…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Global Network Services Pty Ltd v Legion Telecall Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2001] NSWCA 279
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Full Federal Court was required to determine two primary legal issues. Firstly, it had to construe the relevant contractual term to ascertain whether GNS's obligation to direct all calls through Legion's call processing centre was an absolute duty or merely a duty to use best endeavours. Secondly, the court had to decide whether GNS's failure to secure the business of third-party psychic operators for Legion's call processing centre constituted a breach of that contractual term.
The Court reasoned that the contract imposed an absolute duty on GNS to direct all calls through Legion's call processing centre. This interpretation was based on the plain language of the agreement, which did not contain any express qualifications or limitations on GNS's obligation. Consequently, the Court held that GNS's failure to secure the business of third-party psychic operators for Legion did not amount to a breach of the contractual term, as the obligation was solely to direct GNS's own calls. The Court therefore found that Legion had not established a breach of contract.
The appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Appeal and cross appeal dismissed with costs
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.