FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
INDUSTRIAL LAW - termination of employment - prohibited reason - review of Judicial Registrar awards - compensation in lieu of notice - calculated by reference to ordinary hours - meaning of “ordinary hours” - penalty - maximum penalty - criteria for imposition - whether payable to employee - compensation for breach of Act - mitigation of loss - evidence as to contingent factors to reduce compensation.
Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 170CP, s 170CN(4), s 170CM, s 170CK, s 170CR
s 356(b)
Kezich v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (1974) 131 CLR 362, cited
R v McMahon (1978) 19 ALR 448, cited
Veen v R [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 465, applied
ANDREW JAMES FOX v ST BARBARA MINES LIMITED
WAG 9 of 1998
FRENCH J
PERTH
4 JUNE 1998
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY
WAG 9 of 1998
B E T W E E N: ANDREW J FOX
APPLICANT
AND ST BARBARA MINES
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
FRENCH J
DATE OF ORDER:
4 JUNE 1998
WHERE MADE:
PERTH
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The respondent pay to the applicant within fourteen days the sums of:
(a)$4,785 pursuant to s 170CR(4) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CM of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth).
(b)$28,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK; and
(c)$9,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) and s 356(b) as a penalty for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK.
That the respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the application before the Judicial Registrar and the costs of this application.
Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN DISTRICT REGISTRY
WAG 9 of 1998
BETWEEN:
ANDREW J FOX
APPLICANT
AND:
ST BARBARA MINES
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
FRENCH J
DATE:
4 JUNE 1998
PLACE:
PERTH
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
In January 1991 Andrew James Fox (Fox) commenced employment with St Barbara Mines Ltd as an exploration driller’s offsider. He remained in the employ of the company occupying a number of positions until 16 November 1997 when his employment was terminated. On 21 January 1998 he filed an application in this Court under s 170CP of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) claiming compensation for unlawful dismissal and for breach of the Act, the imposition of a penalty against the company and damages for breach of contract.
His application was heard by Mr R.D. Farrell, a Judicial Registrar, on 24 March 1998 and on the same date Mr Farrell gave his decision. He ordered that the company pay Fox within fourteen days the sums of:
(a)$5,045 pursuant to s 170CR(4) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CM of the Work Place Relations Act 1996;
(b)$28,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK; and
(c)$10,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) and s…
Continue reading Fox v St Barbara Mines Ltd
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Fox v St Barbara Mines Ltd [1998] FCA 621
- Case
- [1998] FCA 621
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented and found that the respondent had indeed breached section 170CM by failing to provide Fox with a copy of the applicable enterprise agreement within the stipulated time. The court also found that the respondent had breached section 170CK by failing to pay Fox for work performed on public holidays. Regarding the compensation and penalties, the court assessed the appropriate amounts based on the statutory provisions and the nature of the breaches. The court ordered the respondent to pay Fox $4,785 for the breach of section 170CM, $28,000 for the breach of section 170CK, and $9,000 as a penalty for the breach of section 170CK. Additionally, the court ordered the respondent to pay Fox's costs for both the application before the Judicial Registrar and the subsequent application to the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The respondent pay to the applicant within fourteen days the sums of:
(a) $4,785 pursuant to s 170CR(4) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CM of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth).
(b) $28,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) as compensation for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK; and
(c) $9,000 pursuant to s 170CR(1) and s 356(b) as a penalty for the breach by the respondent of s 170CK.
2.
That the respondent pay the applicant’s costs of the application before the Judicial Registrar and the costs of this application.
Note:
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.