Dibb v Transport for NSW (No 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 34 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Dibb v Transport for NSW (No 2) [2024] NSWLEC 11
Hearing dates: Written submissions filed 8, 22 December 2023, 1 February 2024
Date of orders: 21 February 2024
Decision date: 21 February 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 3
Before: Pain J
Decision:

(1)   The Applicants must pay the Respondent’s costs of the Applicants’ Notice of Motion filed on 26 May 2023 in the amount of $16,451.70 excluding GST.

(2)   The amount of costs payable under order 1 is to be offset against the costs otherwise payable to the Applicants as ordered in Dibb v Transport for NSW [2023] NSWLEC 114.

Catchwords:

COSTS – costs order made in Respondent’s favour in interlocutory proceeding in compensation for compulsory acquisition claim under the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) – costs in interlocutory proceedings not payable on indemnity basis

Legislation Cited:

Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW), Pt 3 Div 4

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 98

Cases Cited:

Banno v Commonwealth (1993) 45 FCR 32

Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 WLR 586

Croghan v Blacktown City Council (2019) 100 NSWLR 757; [2019] NSWCA 248

Davies v Sydney Water Corporation (No 2) [2012] NSWLEC 150

Dibb v Transport for NSW [2023] NSWLEC 114

Dillon v Gosford City Council (2011) 184 LGERA 179; [2011] NSWCA 328

Favotto Family Restaurants Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2020] NSWSC 519

G&J Drivas v Sydney Metro [2023] NSWLEC 20

Krolczyk v Winner t/as J Winner Building Services [2022] NSWCA 196

Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; [1990] HCA 59

Minister for the Environment v Florence (1979) 21 SASR 108

Miwa Pty Ltd v Siantan Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 344

Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622; [1997] HCA 6

Serbian Cultural Club 'St Sava' Inc & Serbian Cultural Club Limited v RTA of New South Wales (No 2) (2008) NSWLEC 78

Taylor v Port Macquarie-Hastings Council (2010) 175 LGERA 189; [2010] NSWLEC 153

Tweed Shire Council v Cooke (No 2) [2023] NSWLEC 98

Walker Corporation Pty Ltd v Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority [2010] NSWLEC 27

Texts Cited:

M2016-03 Model Litigant Policy for Civil Litigation (NSW Government, 29 June 2016)

Category:Costs
Parties: Transport for NSW (Applicant on motion)
Raymond Joseph Dibb (First Respondent on motion)
Wendy Lynn Dibb (Second Respondent on motion)
Representation:

Counsel:
J McKelvey (Applicant on motion)
R Dibb, self-represented (Respondents on motion)

Solicitors:
Maddocks Lawyers (Applicant on motion)
Not applicable (Respondents on motion)
File Number(s): 2022/137180-007

JUDGMENT ON COSTS

  1. In Dibb v Transport for NSW [2023] NSWLEC 114 (Dibb No 1) I ordered that compensation was payable by the Respondent Transport for NSW to the Applicants Mr and Mrs Dibb pursuant to Pt 3 Div 4 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (NSW) for the Applicants’ land in Korora.

  2. On 3 November 2023 I made…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Dibb v Transport for NSW (No 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 11
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Dibb, sought judicial review of the decision of the respondent, Transport for NSW, to refuse to pay for a wheelchair service used to transport them from the Sydney Opera House to Circular Quay railway station. The matter was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The central legal issue before the court was whether the respondent's decision to refuse payment for the wheelchair service was legally valid. The applicants argued that the respondent was obligated to pay for the service under the Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth). The court examined the terms of the Act, the respondent's policy, and the circumstances of the applicants' use of the wheelchair service.

The court held that the respondent was not required to pay for the wheelchair service under the Disability Discrimination Act. The court found that the Act imposed a duty on the respondent to take reasonable steps to prevent disability discrimination, not a duty to pay for specific services. The court also found that the respondent's policy was consistent with the Act and that the applicants' use of the wheelchair service did not fall within the scope of the policy. The court concluded that the respondent's decision was legally valid and dismissed the applicants' application for judicial review. The court also ordered the applicants to pay the respondent's costs of the Notice of Motion.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The Applicants must pay the Respondent’s costs of the Applicants’ Notice of Motion filed on 26 May 2023 in the amount of $16,451.70 excluding GST.

(2) The amount of costs payable under order 1 is to be offset against the costs otherwise payable to the Applicants as ordered in Dibb v Transport for NSW [2023] NSWLEC 114.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.