Cook v Bowen

Case [2007] QDC 108


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Cook v Bowen & Anor [2007] QDC 108

PARTIES:

TRACEY LEANNE COOK

Plaintiff

AND

SHAUNN BOWEN

First Defendant

AND

ALLIANZ AUSTRALIA INSURANCE LTD

Second Defendant

FILE NO/S:

BD1971/06

DIVISION:

PROCEEDING:

Trial

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court, Brisbane

DELIVERED ON:

15 June 2007

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

14 May 2007

JUDGE:

McGill DCJ

ORDER:

That the second defendant pay the plaintiff $70,297.22.

CATCHWORDS:

DAMAGES – Personal injuries – measure of – multiple injuries – assessment of ISV

Ballesteros v Chidlow [2005] QSC 280 – followed.

Coop v Johnston [2005] QDC 79 – followed.

COUNSEL:

J. P. Kimmins for the plaintiff

D. Schneidewin for the defendant

SOLICITORS:

Shine Lawyers for the plaintiff

McInnes Wilson for the defendant

  1. The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 28 October 2004 when the vehicle she was driving, which had stopped behind another vehicle that was giving way to oncoming traffic before turning right, was struck from behind by the first defendant’s vehicle.  Liability was admitted on the pleadings, and it remains to assess the plaintiff’s damages.  These must be assessed in accordance with the Civil Liability Act 2003 and the Civil Liability Regulation.

  1. The plaintiff’s vehicle was struck with some considerable force, and the plaintiff was initially shaken but not immediately conscious of any significant injury:  p 19.  To some extent she was distracted by concern about the welfare of four children who were in the car at the time.  A few hours later she was aware of a headache, pain in the back and neck, and left wrist, pain in a leg, and a general sensation of feeling sore.  About one week later she saw her general practitioner who recommended analgesics[1] and physiotherapy.  She tried physiotherapy but found it quite painful:  p 27.  The problems in the wrist and back subsided after about a week, but the pain in the left side of the neck and the left shoulder blade have stayed the same; the headaches have changed to a tension over the head and neck at times, mainly when driving.  The symptoms are not constant but she gets them every day; various activities bring them on or stir them up:  p 21.  The plaintiff’s credit was not challenged in cross‑examination, and I accept her evidence.

    [1]She does not take these now:  p 27.

Medical Evidence

  1. She was seen for the purposes of a report on 4 October 2005 by Dr Pentis, an orthopaedic surgeon:  Exhibit 1.  He noted that she had complained of severe pain for about a week, after which the pain had been essentially constant.  That was also the plaintiff’s evidence to me:  p 19.  The principal source of pain was in the neck and the left shoulder blade, with a vice like pressure in the neck and occipital musculature.  Turning her head was difficult, for example in reversing a vehicle, and there was difficulty in lifting things, there was some sleep disturbance and difficulties with some household activities, in particular ironing.  She was…

Continue reading Cook v Bowen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Cook v Bowen [2007] QDC 108
Case
[2007] QDC 108
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The plaintiff, Cook, brought an action against Bowen for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. The case was heard in the District Court of Queensland, where the plaintiff sought damages for personal injuries, including the assessment of Incapacitation of Suffering Value (ISV). The defendants were the driver and the insurer of the vehicle involved in the accident. The plaintiff claimed that the injuries were severe and had a significant impact on his life, warranting a high compensation amount.

The primary legal issues before the court were the extent of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, the appropriate measure of damages for these injuries, and the correct calculation of the ISV. The court needed to consider the nature and severity of the injuries, the impact on the plaintiff's ability to work and enjoy life, and the principles established in previous cases such as Ballesteros v Chidlow and Coop v Johnston. The defendants contested the severity of the injuries and the amount of damages claimed.

The court found that the plaintiff had sustained multiple injuries, including a fractured pelvis and rib injuries, which had a significant impact on his life. The court considered the evidence and the relevant case law, ultimately determining that the plaintiff's claim for damages was reasonable. The court awarded the plaintiff $70,297.22, which included the assessment of ISV. The defendants were ordered to pay this amount to the plaintiff.

Orders

Orders of the court

That the second defendant pay the plaintiff $70,297.22.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.