DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Cook v Bowen & Anor [2007] QDC 108
PARTIES:
TRACEY LEANNE COOK
Plaintiff
AND
SHAUNN BOWEN
First Defendant
AND
ALLIANZ AUSTRALIA INSURANCE LTD
Second Defendant
FILE NO/S:
BD1971/06
DIVISION:
PROCEEDING:
Trial
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court, Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
15 June 2007
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
14 May 2007
JUDGE:
McGill DCJ
ORDER:
That the second defendant pay the plaintiff $70,297.22.
CATCHWORDS:
DAMAGES – Personal injuries – measure of – multiple injuries – assessment of ISV
Ballesteros v Chidlow [2005] QSC 280 – followed.
Coop v Johnston [2005] QDC 79 – followed.
COUNSEL:
J. P. Kimmins for the plaintiff
D. Schneidewin for the defendant
SOLICITORS:
Shine Lawyers for the plaintiff
McInnes Wilson for the defendant
The plaintiff was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 28 October 2004 when the vehicle she was driving, which had stopped behind another vehicle that was giving way to oncoming traffic before turning right, was struck from behind by the first defendant’s vehicle. Liability was admitted on the pleadings, and it remains to assess the plaintiff’s damages. These must be assessed in accordance with the Civil Liability Act 2003 and the Civil Liability Regulation.
The plaintiff’s vehicle was struck with some considerable force, and the plaintiff was initially shaken but not immediately conscious of any significant injury: p 19. To some extent she was distracted by concern about the welfare of four children who were in the car at the time. A few hours later she was aware of a headache, pain in the back and neck, and left wrist, pain in a leg, and a general sensation of feeling sore. About one week later she saw her general practitioner who recommended analgesics[1] and physiotherapy. She tried physiotherapy but found it quite painful: p 27. The problems in the wrist and back subsided after about a week, but the pain in the left side of the neck and the left shoulder blade have stayed the same; the headaches have changed to a tension over the head and neck at times, mainly when driving. The symptoms are not constant but she gets them every day; various activities bring them on or stir them up: p 21. The plaintiff’s credit was not challenged in cross‑examination, and I accept her evidence.
[1]She does not take these now: p 27.
Medical Evidence
She was seen for the purposes of a report on 4 October 2005 by Dr Pentis, an orthopaedic surgeon: Exhibit 1. He noted that she had complained of severe pain for about a week, after which the pain had been essentially constant. That was also the plaintiff’s evidence to me: p 19. The principal source of pain was in the neck and the left shoulder blade, with a vice like pressure in the neck and occipital musculature. Turning her head was difficult, for example in reversing a vehicle, and there was difficulty in lifting things, there was some sleep disturbance and difficulties with some household activities, in particular ironing. She was…
Continue reading Cook v Bowen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Cook v Bowen [2007] QDC 108
- Case
- [2007] QDC 108
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were the extent of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, the appropriate measure of damages for these injuries, and the correct calculation of the ISV. The court needed to consider the nature and severity of the injuries, the impact on the plaintiff's ability to work and enjoy life, and the principles established in previous cases such as Ballesteros v Chidlow and Coop v Johnston. The defendants contested the severity of the injuries and the amount of damages claimed.
The court found that the plaintiff had sustained multiple injuries, including a fractured pelvis and rib injuries, which had a significant impact on his life. The court considered the evidence and the relevant case law, ultimately determining that the plaintiff's claim for damages was reasonable. The court awarded the plaintiff $70,297.22, which included the assessment of ISV. The defendants were ordered to pay this amount to the plaintiff.
Orders
Orders of the court
That the second defendant pay the plaintiff $70,297.22.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.