Legal Research
Cases
Bergeron & Bergeron

Bergeron & Bergeron

Case [2022] FedCFamC2F 644

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Bergeron & Bergeron [2022] FedCFamC2F 644
Case: [2022] FedCFamC2F 644
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Bergeron & Bergeron [2022] FedCFamC2F 644

Most Recent Citation

Kalgreen & Kalgreen [2023] FedCFamC2F 225

Cases Citing This Decision

Bergeron & Bergeron [2022] FedCFamC1A 140
Citation 1

…Circuit and Family Court of Australia (DIVISION 1) APPELLATE JURISDICTION Bergeron & Bergeron [2022] FedCFamC1A 140 Appeal from: Bergeron & Bergeron [2022] FedCFamC2F 644 Appeal number(s): NAA 130 of 2022 File number(s): SYC 7747 of 2018 Judgment of: ALDRIDGE J Date of judgment: 7 September 2022 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW…
Kalgreen & Kalgreen [2023] FedCFamC2F 225
Citation 2

…ion Act 1969 (NSW) s 14 Cases cited: AJO v GRO (2005) 191 FLR 317 Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350 Bergeron & Bergeron [2022] FedCFamC2F 644 Bevan & Bevan (2013) 279 FLR 1 Black v Kellner (1992) FLC 92-287 Browne v Greene [1999] FamCA 1483 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Dupas v The Queen [2012] VSCA 328 Fields & Sm…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Maidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48
Citation 1 (Para 8)

…ntially edited, the Full Court of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia delivered judgment in the matter of Maidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48 while I was on a period of leave. In particular, I note paragraphs 5 and 10 thereof: [5] An accurate recording of proceedings has become a fundamental and invari…
Benson & Drury [2020] FamCAFC 303
Citation 2

…FC 196 Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350 Benson & Drury [2020] FamCAFC 303 Bevan v Bevan (2013) 279 FLR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63 Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21 Grier & Malphas (2017) 55 Fam…
Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350
Citation 3

…317 Amador & Amador [2009] FamCAFC 196 Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350 Benson & Drury [2020] FamCAFC 303 Bevan v Bevan (2013) 279 FLR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63 Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC…
Jabour & Jabour [2019] FamCAFC 78
Citation 4

…Marriage of Harris (1991) 104 FLR 458 Jabour & Jabour [2019] FamCAFC 78 Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235 Keating v Keating [2019] FamCAFC 46 Kennon v Kennon (1997) 139 FLR 118 M & M (1988) 166 CLR 69 Maidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48 Masoud & Masoud [2016] FamCAFC 24 Mazorski & Albright (2007) 37 Fam LR 518 McC…
Keating & Keating [2019] FamCAFC 46
Citation 5

…78 Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235 Keating v Keating [2019] FamCAFC 46 Kennon v Kennon (1997) 139 FLR 118 M & M (1988) 166 CLR 69 Maidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48 Masoud & Masoud [2016] FamCAFC 24 Mazorski & Albright (2007) 37 Fam LR 518 McCall & Clark [2009] FamCAFC 92 Minterly & Minterly [2013] FamCA 418 Na…
Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173
Citation 6

…108 Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptable Risk) [2005] FamCA 892 Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 1456 Date of hearing: 24-28 August 2020, 16 October 2020, 4-5 March 2021, 1…
Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63
Citation 7

…54 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63 Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21 Grier & Malphas (2017) 55 Fam LR 107 Harridge and Anor & Harridge and Anor [2010] FamCA 445 Hickey & Hickey & Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FamCA 395 In the Marriage of Harris (1991…
FERREIRA & FERREIRA [2018] FamCA 99
Citation 8 (Para 8)

…can be found in the decision of the High Court in M & M (1988) 166 CLR 69 and the decisions of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in A & A & The Child Representative [1998] FamCA 25 (especially at 3.23 to 3.25), and Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316, Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235. I have had recours…
Shan & Prasad [2018] FamCAFC 12
Citation 9

…992) 67 ALJR 170 S & S [2003] FamCA 905 Shan & Prasad [2018] FamCAFC 12 Smith & NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptabl…
Norman and Sinclair [2017] FCCA 2069
Citation 10

…5 Keating v Keating [2019] FamCAFC 46 Kennon v Kennon (1997) 139 FLR 118 M & M (1988) 166 CLR 69 Maidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48 Masoud & Masoud [2016] FamCAFC 24 Mazorski & Albright (2007) 37 Fam LR 518 McCall & Clark [2009] FamCAFC 92 Minterly & Minterly [2013] FamCA 418 Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316 Ne…
Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21
Citation 11 (Para 8)

…f Australia in the recent decision of Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21: A discretionary judgment concerning the parenting orders necessarily involves, because of the focus upon the future, significant elements of value judgments; assumptions; necessarily uncertain predictions and intuition.[14] [14] Grella & Jami…
Sullivan and Cunez (No 2) [2016] FamCA 360
Citation 12

…ar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptable Risk) [2005] FamCA 892 Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 1456 Da…
Masoud & Masoud [2016] FamCAFC 24
Citation 13

…aidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48 Masoud & Masoud [2016] FamCAFC 24 Mazorski & Albright (2007) 37 Fam LR 518 McCall & Clark [2009] FamCAFC 92 Minterly & Minterly [2013] FamCA 418 Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 S & S [2003] FamCA 905 Shan & P…
Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132
Citation 14

…tanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptable Risk) [2005] FamCA 892 Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 1456 Date of hearing: 24-28 August 2020, 1…
Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57
Citation 15

…6 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63 Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21 Grier & Malphas (2017) 55 Fam LR 107 Harridge and Anor & Harridge and Anor [2010] FamCA 445 Hickey & Hickey & Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FamCA…
Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51
Citation 16

…CAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptable Risk) [2005] FamCA 892 Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 1456 Date of hearing: 24-28 August 2020, 16 October 2020, 4-5 March 2021, 19 March 2021 Place: Sydney Cou…
Bevan & Bevan [2014] FamCAFC 19
Citation 17

…A 350 Benson & Drury [2020] FamCAFC 303 Bevan v Bevan (2013) 279 FLR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63 Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21 Grier & Malphas (2017) 55 Fam LR 107 Harridge and Anor & Harr…
Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154
Citation 18

…shaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63 Grella & Jamieson [2017] FamCAFC 21 Grier & Malphas (2017) 55 Fam LR 107 Harridge and Anor & Harridge and Anor [2010] FamCA 445 Hickey & Hickey & Attorney-General for the Commo…
Harridge & Harridge [2010] FamCA 445
Citation 19

…) 55 Fam LR 107 Harridge and Anor & Harridge and Anor [2010] FamCA 445 Hickey & Hickey & Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FamCA 395 In the Marriage of Harris (1991) 104 FLR 458 Jabour & Jabour [2019] FamCAFC 78 Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235 Keating v Keating [2019] FamCAFC 46 Kennon v Ke…
Shelley and Hunt and Ors [2010] FamCA 225
Citation 20 (Para 8)

…sion of the High Court of Australia in Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170, in which their Honours stated “… the strength of the evidence necessary to establish a fact in issue on the balance of probabilities will vary according to the nature of what is sought to be proved.”[8] [8] Nea…
Amador & Amador [2009] FamCAFC 196
Citation 21

…FamCA 25 AJO v GRO (2005) 191 FLR 317 Amador & Amador [2009] FamCAFC 196 Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350 Benson & Drury [2020] FamCAFC 303 Bevan v Bevan (2013) 279 FLR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 Fontana & Fontana [2018] FamCAFC 63…
Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235
Citation 22 (Para 8)

…and Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316, Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235. I have had recourse to each of these authorities. Where there is contested evidence, the Court is not always able to make a finding, but must do what can be done on the basis of agreed facts and any contested evidence where there is sufficien…
Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316
Citation 23 (Para 8)

…A 25 (especially at 3.23 to 3.25), and Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316, Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235. I have had recourse to each of these authorities. Where there is contested evidence, the Court is not always able to make a finding, but must do what can be done on the basis of agreed facts and any contested…
W & W (Abuse allegations: unacceptable risk) [2005] FamCA 892
Citation 24

…FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptable Risk) [2005] FamCA 892 Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 1456 Date of hearing: 24-28 August 2020, 16 October 2020, 4-5 March 2021, 19 March 2021 Place: Sydney Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Stefan Schonell Solicitor for the Applicant: The Norton Law…
Omacini & Omacini [2005] FamCA 195
Citation 25

…& The Child Representative [1998] FamCA 25 AJO v GRO (2005) 191 FLR 317 Amador & Amador [2009] FamCAFC 196 Bacall & Zagar [2020] FamCA 350 Benson & Drury [2020] FamCAFC 303 Bevan v Bevan (2013) 279 FLR 1 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Dickons & Dickons [2012] FamCAFC 154 Fields & Smith [2015] FamCAFC 57 F…
Aluminium Louvres & Ceilings Pty Ltd v Zheng [2004] NSWWCCPD 26
Citation 26 (Para 8)

…2021 (Cth) (“the FCFCOA Act”) … … [10] We note that similar views have been expressed in other jurisdictions. For instance, in Aluminium Louvres & Ceilings Pty Ltd v Zheng (2006) 4 DDCR 358 (“Aluminium Louvres”), Bryson JA (with whom Handley JA and Bell J agreed) at [32] stated that the absence of the transcript of proceedings before a Conciliation…
S & S [2003] FamCA 905
Citation 27

…d v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 S & S [2003] FamCA 905 Shan & Prasad [2018] FamCAFC 12 Smith & NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W…
Hickey & Hickey [2003] FamCA 395
Citation 28

…& Attorney-General for the Commonwealth of Australia [2003] FamCA 395 In the Marriage of Harris (1991) 104 FLR 458 Jabour & Jabour [2019] FamCAFC 78 Johnson & Page [2007] FamCA 1235 Keating v Keating [2019] FamCAFC 46 Kennon v Kennon (1997) 139 FLR 118 M & M (1988) 166 CLR 69 Maidment & Insley [2022] FedCFamC1A 48…
Smith v New South Wales Bar Association [1992] HCA 36
Citation 29

…Prasad [2018] FamCAFC 12 Smith & NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 Talbot & Talbot [2015] FamCAFC 132 Trevi & Trevi [2018] FamCAFC 173 Vass & Vass [2015] FamCAFC 51 WK & SR [1997] FamCA 57 W & W (Abuse Allegations: Unacceptable Risk) [2005] FamCA 892 Division: Division 2 F…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 36
Citation 30 (Para 8)

…d”, as referred to in 140(2)(c) of the EA, I am mindful of the oft quoted passage from Dixon J in Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 at 361 to 362: … when the law requires the proof of any fact, the Tribunal must feel an actual persuasion of its occurrence or existence before it can be found. It cannot be found as a resul…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34
Citation 31 (Para 8)

…0(2)(c) of the EA, I am mindful of the oft quoted passage from Dixon J in Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 at 361 to 362: … when the law requires the proof of any fact, the Tribunal must feel an actual persuasion of its occurrence or existence before it can be found. It cannot be found as a result of a near…
Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCATrans 297
Citation 32 (Para 8)

…n unacceptable risk. I also take note of the decision of the High Court of Australia in Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170, in which their Honours stated “… the strength of the evidence necessary to establish a fact in issue on the balance of probabilities will vary according to the nature of what is sought to be proved.…
Minterly & Minterly [2013] FamCA 418
Citation 33

…McCall & Clark [2009] FamCAFC 92 Minterly & Minterly [2013] FamCA 418 Napier & Hepburn [2006] FamCA 1316 Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170 S & S [2003] FamCA 905 Shan & Prasad [2018] FamCAFC 12 Smith & NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256 Stanford & Stanford (2012) 247 CLR 108 T…

AI Chat coming soon