Application of Melvyn Malcolm Posner

Link copied
Case Copied 5 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

APPLICATION OF MELVYN MALCOLM POSNER [2007] FMCA 610
BANKRUPTCY – Creditors meetings not held within time prescribed – power of Court to extend time.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.33(1)(c), 188, 189A, 190, 194(1)
Re Gowing & Anor, ex parte Deputy Registrar in Bankruptcy (1985) 11 FCR 111
Applicant: MELVYN MALCOLM POSNER
File number: PEG 62 of 2007
Judgment of: FM Lucev
Hearing date: 16 April 2007
Date of last submission: 16 April 2007
Delivered at: Perth
Delivered on: 16 April 2007

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms F F Xue
Solicitors for the Applicant: Christensen Vaughan

ORDERS

  1. The time limit in s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) in which the controlling trustee is to call a meeting of the debtor's creditors be extended until hearing of this application;

  2. The time limit in s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), in which the controlling trustee is to call a meeting of the debtor's creditors, be further extended to a date 28 days from today.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
PERTH

PEG62 of 2007

MELVYN MALCOLM POSNER

Applicant

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Revised from transcript)

  1. This is an application under s.33 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“Bankruptcy Act”) to enlarge the time limit set by s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, in which the controlling trustee must call a meeting of the debtor's creditors. The applicant seeks interim relief in terms of an order that the time limit in s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, in which the controlling trustee is to call the meeting of the debtor's creditors, be extended until the hearing of this application. The substantive relief sought is an order in similar terms, but to extend time under s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act to call a meeting of the debtor's creditors to be extended for a period of 28 days from today. 

  2. The grounds on which the application are made are set out in the affidavit of Christopher James Daws sworn on 10 April 2007. 
    Mr Daws deposes that he is a director employed by Dickson Carrello, Chartered Accountants, and that the applicant is the controlling trustee of the property of Stephen Drake-Brockman. The day to day conduct of the administration is with Mr Daws. He indicates that he has caused to be prepared a controlling trustee's report under s.189A of the Bankruptcy Act, and that that report is currently in draft form and intended to be finalised once a date has been set down for the creditors' meeting.

  3. Mr Daws deposes to the fact that on 30 March 2007 he received a call from an inspector with Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia, inquiring whether a creditors' meeting had been held in accordance with s.194 of the Bankruptcy Act. Mr Daws says that he then realised that he had not caused the controlling trustee to call the meeting to be held before 4 April 2004, and as such the controlling trustee could not comply with s.190(1)…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Application of Melvyn Malcolm Posner and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2007] FMCA 610
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application of Melvyn Malcolm Posner was heard in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, where the applicant sought an extension of the time limit for the controlling trustee to convene a meeting of the debtor's creditors. The dispute centred on the statutory obligations under section 194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) concerning the timeframe within which the trustee must call such a meeting.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the statutory timeframe for the convening of a creditors' meeting could be extended under the circumstances presented. The applicant argued that exceptional circumstances warranted an extension beyond the statutory period, and that the court had the discretion to grant such an extension.

The court found that it had the jurisdiction to extend the time limit under section 194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) due to the exceptional circumstances presented. It was noted that the trustee had not opposed the extension, and that any prejudice to creditors would be minimal. Accordingly, the court granted the application, extending the time limit until the hearing of the application, and further extending it to a date 28 days from the date of the order.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The time limit in s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) in which the controlling trustee is to call a meeting of the debtor's creditors be extended until hearing of this application;

2.

The time limit in s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), in which the controlling trustee is to call a meeting of the debtor's creditors, be further extended to a date 28 days from today.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.