Application By Benjamin Peter Piggott

Link copied
Case Copied 5 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

APPLICATION BY BENJAMIN PETER PIGGOTT [2010] FMCA 23
BANKRUPTCY – Extension of time for holding of creditors meeting – power to extend time – exercise of discretion – factors.
Bankruptcy Act 1966, ss.33(1)(c), 194

Application by Benjamin Peter Piggott [2009] FMCA 1061
Application of Malcolm Melvyn Posner [2007] FMCA 610
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Eddy (2006) 151 FCR 34; [2006] FCA 254
Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344
Pretorius v Daltons Carpet Tiles Pty Ltd (1984) 1 FCR 346

Re Gowing; Ex parte Deputy Registrar in Bankruptcy (1985) 11 FCR 111

Applicant: APPLICATION BY BENJAMIN PETER PIGGOTT AS CONTROLLING TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID JOHN POKE
File Number: PEG 5 of 2010
Judgment of: Lucev FM
Hearing date: 14 January 2010
Date of Last Submission: 14 January 2010
Delivered at: Perth
Delivered on: 14 January 2010

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr P D'Angelo
Solicitors for the Applicant: D'Angelo Legal

ORDERS

  1. This application be made returnable instanter.

  2. The time for holding of the Meeting of Creditors pursuant to Section 194 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) be extended from 27 January 2010 to 17 February 2010.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
PERTH

PEG 5 of 2010

APPLICATION BY BENJAMIN PETER PIGGOTT AS CONTROLLING TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF DAVID JOHN POKE

Applicant

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Edited ex tempore reasons)

  1. This is an application under s.33 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)[1] to extend the time set by s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, in which the controlling trustee must call a meeting of creditors. The application seeks to be made returnable instanter and the Court is prepared to deal with it on that basis.

    [1] “Bankruptcy Act”.

  2. The controlling trustee has filed an affidavit, sworn on 12 January 2010.[2]

    [2] Affidavit of Benjamin Peter Piggott, sworn 12 January 2010 (“Affidavit”).

  3. The Affidavit deposes to the following:

    a)that there was a requirement to hold a meeting of creditors by 27 January 2010 by giving notice by 14 January 2010;[3]

    [3] Affidavit, para.5.

    b)the circumstances of the investigation into the Debtor’s affairs including:

    (i)the debtor’s legal and beneficial ownership of hay stock and cattle situated at some eleven various leasehold farming properties in Western Australia;

    (ii)the debtor’s disposal of and/or dealings with cattle the subject of separate Bills of Sale with Landmark Operations Limited and Landmark Financial Services Limited;

    (iii)the veracity of creditors’ claims against the Debtor or alternatively hay or cattle of the Debtor which were purportedly sold by the debtor to the creditors concerned pursuant to various arrangements, some of which still remain in the possession of the debtor;

    (iv)the debtor’s conduct generally, in particular his dealings with customer prepayment funds (for hay and cattle agistment) as well as cattle subject to Bills of Sale; and

    (v)whether the debtor’s proposed Personal Insolvency Agreement (or variation thereof) is in creditors’ interests as compared against bankruptcy or ending the controlling trustee’s…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Application By Benjamin Peter Piggott and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2010] FMCA 23
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, the matter of an application by Benjamin Peter Piggott was heard. The applicant, a debtor, sought an extension of time to hold a Meeting of Creditors pursuant to section 194 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The current date for the Meeting of Creditors was 27 January 2010, and the applicant requested an extension to 17 February 2010. The application was made returnable immediately.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient cause to warrant an extension of the time for holding the Meeting of Creditors. The court needed to consider the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and assess the circumstances presented by the applicant to determine if there were valid grounds for the requested extension. The court also needed to balance the interests of the debtor, creditors, and the objectives of the bankruptcy legislation.

In assessing the application, the court considered the statutory framework provided by the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and the circumstances of the applicant. The court found that the applicant had presented a credible case for an extension, taking into account the reasons for the delay and the impact on the creditors. The court concluded that it was appropriate to grant the extension to allow the applicant sufficient time to prepare for the Meeting of Creditors. Consequently, the court ordered that the time for holding the Meeting of Creditors be extended from 27 January 2010 to 17 February 2010.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

This application be made returnable instanter.

2.

The time for holding of the Meeting of Creditors pursuant to Section 194 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) be extended from 27 January 2010 to 17 February 2010.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.