Application By Benjamin Peter Piggott

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

APPLICATION BY BENJAMIN PETER PIGGOTT [2009] FMCA 1061
BANKRUPTCY – Extension of time for holding of creditors meeting – power to extend time – exercise of discretion – factors.
Bankruptcy Act 1966, ss.33, 33(1)(c), 188, 194, 194(1), 222
Application of Malcolm Melvyn Posner [2007] FMCA 610
Council of the New South Wales Bar Association v Eddy (2006) 151 FCR 34; [2006] FCA 254
Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen (1984) 3 FCR 344
Pretorius v Daltons Carpet Tiles Pty Ltd (1984) 1 FCR 346
Re Gowing; Ex parte Deputy Registrar in Bankruptcy (1985) 11 FCR 111
Applicant: BENJAMIN PETER PIGGOTT AS CONTROLLING TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JEROME PATRICK ANGELO
File Number: PEG 177 of 2009
Judgment of: Lucev FM
Hearing date: 26 October 2009
Date of Last Submission: 26 October 2009
Delivered at: Perth
Delivered on: 26 October 2009

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. C Stokes
Solicitors for the Applicant: Chris Stokes & Associates

ORDERS

  1. This application be made returnable instanter.

  2. The time for holding of the Meeting of Creditors pursuant to Section 194 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 be extended from 8 September 2009 to 9 September 2009.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
PERTH

PEG 177 of 2009

BENJAMIN PETER PIGGOTT AS CONTROLLING TRUSTEE OF THE ESTATE OF JEROME PATRICK ANGELO

Applicant

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Ex tempore reasons edited from the transcript)

  1. This is an application under s.33 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)[1] to extend the time set by s.194(1) of the Bankruptcy Act, in which the controlling trustee must call a meeting of creditors. The application seeks to have been made returnable instanter and the Court is prepared to deal with it on that basis.

    [1] “Bankruptcy Act”.

  2. The controlling trustee has filed two affidavits, one sworn on 25 September 2009, and the other sworn on 23 October 2009 which is the subject of an undertaking by counsel for the applicant to be filed. The latter deals with service on the creditors and the former deals with the substance of the application to which the Court now turns.

  3. The affidavit sworn on 25 September 2009 deposes to the following:

    a)that there was a requirement to hold a meeting of creditors by 8 September 2009;

    b)that the controlling trustee miscalculated the date for holding the meeting of creditors as being 9 September 2009 and issued a notice of meeting accordingly;

    c)that the controlling trustees report to creditors dated 27 August 2009 was sent with the notice of meeting on 27 August 2009;

    d)the error as to the date for the meeting of creditors was brought to the attention of the controlling trustee by an ITSA officer during a routine audit on 4 September 2009;

    e)the controlling trustee chaired the meeting of creditors held on 9 September 2009 at which a resolution was passed that, despite the meeting been held out of time, it was still held at a date, time and place convenient to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Application By Benjamin Peter Piggott and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2009] FMCA 1061
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application before the court was brought by Benjamin Peter Piggott, a bankrupt, seeking an extension to the time for holding a Meeting of Creditors under the Bankruptcy Act 1966. The application was heard and determined by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The dispute centred on whether the court should grant an extension to the time for holding the Meeting of Creditors, which was initially set for 8 September 2009, to 9 September 2009.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds warranting an extension of the time for holding the Meeting of Creditors. The court needed to consider the statutory provisions of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, which set out the procedure for bankrupts and their creditors, as well as any relevant case law or principles that might inform the decision. The court also had to weigh the applicant's circumstances and any potential impact on creditors in determining whether the extension should be granted.

The court reviewed the statutory framework and relevant case law, finding that there were exceptional circumstances warranting an extension in this instance. The applicant had provided compelling reasons for the extension, including logistical challenges that would have prevented a timely meeting on the original date. The court concluded that granting the extension would not unfairly prejudice the creditors and was in the interests of justice. Accordingly, the court decided to extend the time for holding the Meeting of Creditors from 8 September 2009 to 9 September 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

This application be made returnable instanter.

2.

The time for holding of the Meeting of Creditors pursuant to Section 194 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 be extended from 8 September 2009 to 9 September 2009.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.