Shepard v Ireland

Link copied
Case Copied 8 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

SHEPARD v IRELAND [2011] FMCA 187
BANKRUPTCY – Appointment of controlling trustee under Part X – duty to call creditors’ meeting within 25 working days – ex parte application by trustee for extension of time – discretionary considerations – notice should be given to a creditor with a pending petition – application adjourned with only a short extension.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.33(1)(c), 64N, 64Y, 188, 188(2C)(b), 189(1A)(d), 189AAA, 189A, 194, 194(1)(a), 204, 294
Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), reg.10.04
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Toma [2009] FMCA 846
Prentice v Gore [2010] FMCA 737
Re Application of Melvyn Malcolm Posner [2007] FMCA 610
Applicant: ADAM SHEPARD
Respondent: WILLIAM EDWARD IRELAND
File Number: SYG 508 of 2011
Judgment of: Smith FM
Hearing date: 21 March 2011
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 21 March 2011

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Rosenblatt
Solicitors for the Applicant: Somerset Ryckmans
Counsel for the Respondent: No appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent

ORDERS

  1. Pursuant to s.33(1)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) the time provided in s.194(1)(a) is extended by 4 working days.

  2. The application for a longer extension is adjourned for hearing on 24 March 2011 at 10.15am. 

  3. The applicant must serve electronic copies of the application, the affidavit in support, and this order on the respondent and the solicitors for the petitioner in proceedings SYG144/2011 no later than 5pm on 21 March 2011. 

  4. Any person seeking to appear at the hearing to oppose the application must file and serve on the applicant a notice of appearance and any affidavits relied upon, no later than 3pm on 23 March 2011. 

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AT SYDNEY

SYG 508 of 2011

ADAM SHEPARD

Applicant

And

WILLIAM EDWARD IRELAND

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(revised from transcript)

  1. Mr Shepard applies today for an ex parte order extending time for the holding of a creditors’ meeting, at which a personal insolvency agreement proposed by Mr Ireland under Part X of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) can be voted upon. Mr Shepard is the controlling trustee of Mr Ireland’s estate, after accepting an appointment under s.188. Under s.194 the creditors’ meeting must be called “not more than 25 working days after the relevant consent or approval was given”, and in the present case that period expires on 1 April 2011. 

  2. A creditors’ meeting may be adjourned if a quorum is not present or if a resolution for adjournment is passed (see ss.64N and 64Y). Otherwise, creditors may vote upon one of the resolutions provided under s.204, which include ending the control of the trustee, requiring the execution of the proposed agreement, or requiring the debtor to present a debtor’s petition within 7 days. The control of the trustee terminates 4 months after his or her appointment, if no resolution is passed within that period or if the trustee’s control is not otherwise terminated (see s.189(1A)(d)).

  3. Under reg.10.04 of the Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), the controlling trustee must give all creditors…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Shepard v Ireland and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2011] FMCA 187
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Shepard v Ireland involved a dispute related to bankruptcy proceedings, specifically concerning the extension of a time limit set out in the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The case was heard in a relevant Australian court, which will be referred to as the Court. The primary issue before the Court was whether the applicant, Shepard, should be granted an extension of time to comply with a statutory requirement under the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The Court had to determine if the reasons provided by Shepard were sufficient to warrant the requested extension. Additionally, the Court considered the procedural requirements for applying for such an extension and the consequences of failing to meet the statutory deadlines.

The Court examined the statutory provisions and the circumstances under which an extension could be granted. It took into account the provisions of s.33(1)(c) and s.194(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) and assessed the merits of the applicant's request. The Court considered the reasons provided by Shepard for the delay and whether they were reasonable and justifiable. The Court also reviewed the procedural steps that Shepard had taken to apply for the extension and whether they complied with the relevant rules and requirements. Ultimately, the Court determined that the application for the extension should be granted, but with specific conditions attached to ensure that the application process was properly followed.

The Court granted the application for an extension of time by four working days, as requested by Shepard. However, it set out specific conditions for the service of documents and notices in relation to the application. The Court also scheduled a hearing for the application of a longer extension to a later date, allowing both parties sufficient time to prepare their arguments. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements and procedural rules in bankruptcy proceedings and highlighted the need for timely and proper communication between the parties. The orders reflect the Court's decision to balance the need for extensions with the importance of maintaining the integrity of the legal process.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Pursuant to s.33(1)(c) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) the time provided in s.194(1)(a) is extended by 4 working days.

2.

The application for a longer extension is adjourned for hearing on 24 March 2011 at 10.15am.

3.

The applicant must serve electronic copies of the application, the affidavit in support, and this order on the respondent and the solicitors for the petitioner in proceedings SYG144/2011 no later than 5pm on 21 March 2011.

4.

Any person seeking to appear at the hearing to oppose the application must file and serve on the applicant a notice of appearance and any affidavits relied upon, no later than 3pm on 23 March 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.