Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2014] NSWCA 40 Hearing dates: 5 March 2014 Decision date: 05 March 2014 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1];
Gleeson JA at [8];
Leeming JA at [9]Decision: (1) The Amended Summons is stood over for directions before the Registrar on a date to be appointed by him.
(2) The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs thrown away by the adjournment.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - adjournment application - inadequate material in support - no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, s 119 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: AHB (Appellant)
NSW Trustee and Guardian (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Appellant (Self-represented and not present)
J Emmett (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Appellant (Self-represented)
Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent)
File Number(s): CA 2013/286294 Decision under appeal
- Citation:
- AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWADTAP 37
- Date of Decision:
- 2012-08-08 00:00:00
- Before:
- N Hennessy Deputy President, L Goodchild Judicial Member, B Thomson Non-Judicial Member
- File Number(s):
- 129011
Judgment
MACFARLAN JA: Listed before the Court for hearing today is an Amended Summons naming a protected person as appellant and a person to be known as AHB as her tutor. As the respondent has pointed out in written submissions, there are procedural difficulties in the proceedings, not least of them related to the identity of the appellant. The respondent sensibly recognises however that the substance of the proceedings in this Court is an appeal by AHB against the decision dated 8 August 2012 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Appeal Panel ([2012] NSWADTAP 37) that appeal being limited by the legislation in force at the relevant time (Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, s 119) to an appeal on a question of law.
AHB is the son of the aged protected person. In 2011, the Public Guardian was appointed the protected person's guardian with the functions of access and accommodation, with the respondent being appointed as the protected person's financial manager. In the Administrative Decisions Tribunal AHB challenged the respondent's decision to sell the protected person's home in Gymea Bay.
AHB is an unrepresented litigant. Yesterday, he sent by email to the Registrar of the Court a medical certificate and a document indicating that a related matter in the Guardianship Division of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal was adjourned on 28 February 2014 for a period of approximately eight weeks.
Based on these documents he sought an adjournment of the hearing fixed for today. In his email he says that he is "quite ill…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] NSWCA 40
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the primary judge erred in refusing the adjournment application. This required the court to consider the adequacy of the material before the primary judge in support of the adjournment request and whether the refusal involved an error of principle.
The Court of Appeal found that the material before the primary judge was inadequate to justify an adjournment. The court noted that there was no issue of principle involved in the refusal of the adjournment application. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The Amended Summons was stood over for directions before the Registrar on a date to be appointed by him. The appellant was ordered to pay the respondent's costs thrown away by the adjournment.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The Amended Summons is stood over for directions before the Registrar on a date to be appointed by him.
(2) The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs thrown away by the adjournment.
[Note: The Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 provide (Rule 36.11) that unless the Court otherwise orders, a judgment or order is taken to be entered when it is recorded in the Court's computerised court record system. Setting aside and variation of judgments or orders is dealt with by Rules 36.15, 36.16, 36.17 and 36.18. Parties should in particular note the time limit of fourteen days in Rule 36.16.]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.