AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

Administrative Decisions Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2012] NSWADTAP 37
Hearing dates:8 August 2012
Decision date: 08 August 2012
Jurisdiction:Appeal Panel - Internal
Before: Magistrate N Hennessy, Deputy President
L Goodchild, Judicial Member
B Thomson, Non-Judicial Member
Decision:

1. Leave to extend the appeal to the merits of the Tribunal's decision is refused.

2. The Tribunal's decision is affirmed.

3. The appeal is dismissed.

Catchwords: APPEAL - decision by NSW Trustee to sell property - appeal on a question of law and on merits - no error of law - leave refused to appeal on merits
Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997
NSW Trustee and Guardian Act 2009
Guardianship Act 1987
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: AHB (Appellant)
NSW Trustee and Guardian (Respondent)
Representation: AHB (Appellant in person)
NSW Trustee and Guardian (Respondent)
File Number(s):129011
Publication restriction:S126 of the Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 applies
 Decision under appeal 
Jurisdiction:
9108
Citation:
[2012] NSWADT 76
Date of Decision:
2012-04-27 00:00:00
File Number(s):
113308

REASON FOR DECISION

  1. HER HONOUR: AHB, we have been able to come to a decision and the decision is to dismiss the appeal and to affirm the Tribunal's decision.

  1. AHB has appealed against a decision of the Tribunal made on 27 April 2012, affirming a decision of the New South Wales Trustee and Guardian, to sell his mother's home.

  1. The decision to sell the home came about as a result of a decision by the Public Guardian who has guardianship over AHB's mother, and can make decisions about where she should live. The Public Guardian made a decision that AHB's mother should live in a higher care facility than that in which she currently resides and that in order to do so, a bond of around $350,000 would be required.

  1. As AHB's mother's financial manager, the New South Wales Trustee was asked to form a view as to how the money for the bond could be raised. The New South Wales Trustee looked at the assets of AHB's mother and her income and her liabilities and came to a decision that the correct decision was to sell her property. As I have said, the Tribunal below made a decision which affirmed the New South Wales Trustee's decision.

  1. AHB has appealed against that decision to the Appeal Panel. He can appeal on a question of law as of right or with leave on the merits: Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997, s 114 and 115. AHB confirmed that his grounds of appeal were as set out in a document dated 1 August 2012 and received by the Tribunal on 2 August 2012. That document sets out three grounds of appeal and I will deal with them each in turn.

  1. The first ground is that his mother does have the legal capacity to make a specific decision and that the Tribunal was wrong in assuming that she did not have that capacity. The question of AHB's mother's capacity to…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read AHB v NSW Trustee and Guardian and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] NSWADTAP 37
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, AHB, sought to challenge the decision of the respondent, NSW Trustee and Guardian, to sell a property in dispute. The matter was heard and dismissed by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, with AHB now seeking to appeal both on a question of law and on the merits of the case. The court considered the grounds of appeal and examined whether the decision-maker had erred in law, as well as whether there was any error in the exercise of discretion by the decision-maker. In assessing the appeal, the court found that there was no error of law in the decision of the respondent and, therefore, no grounds for appeal on the merits. The appeal was dismissed, and leave to extend the appeal to the merits of the Tribunal's decision was refused. The decision of the Tribunal was affirmed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave to extend the appeal to the merits of the Tribunal's decision is refused.

2. The Tribunal's decision is affirmed.

3. The appeal is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.