Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Foundation

Link copied
Case Copied 84 min read

    Summary


    Hilary Term
    [2012] UKSC 2
    On appeal from: [2010] EWCA Civ 698

    JUDGMENT

    Rabone and another (Appellants) v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (Respondent)

    before
    Lord Walker
    Lady Hale
    Lord Brown
    Lord Mance
    Lord Dyson
    JUDGMENT GIVEN ON

    8 February 2012

    Heard on 7 to 9 November 2011
    Appellants
    Jenni Richards QC
    Nigel Poole
    (Instructed by Pannone LLP)
      Respondent
    Monica Carss-Frisk QC
    Jane Mulcahy
    (Instructed by Hempsons)
         
    Interveners (INQUEST, JUSTICE, Liberty and Mind)
    Paul Bowen and Alison Pickup
    (Instructed by Bindmans LLP)
       
    LORD DYSON
  1. Some time after 17.00 hrs on 20 April 2005, Melanie Rabone hanged herself from a tree in Lyme Park, Cheshire. She was 24 years of age and was the loved daughter of Mr and Mrs Rabone. At the time, she was on two days' home leave from Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport where she was undergoing treatment for a depressive disorder as an informal patient (ie one who was not detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 ("the MHA")). She had been admitted to the hospital as an emergency following a suicide attempt. She was assessed by the hospital as a high risk of a further suicide attempt. Mr and Mrs Rabone have always maintained that the hospital authorities should not have allowed her home leave and that they were responsible for their daughter's tragic death. They started proceedings against the Pennine Care NHS Trust ("the trust") alleging negligence and breach of the right to life protected by article 2 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention"). The trust eventually admitted negligence, but they have never admitted liability for breach of article 2. A number of issues were raised in the proceedings all of which are live in this appeal. The claim failed because the judge (Simon J) held that the operational duty implicit in article 2 did not apply in this case: there was no duty on the hospital authorities under article 2 to take reasonable steps to guard Melanie against the risk of suicide: [2010] EWHC 1827. He also held that, if there was such a duty, there had been no breach of it by the trust on the facts of this case. The Court of Appeal (Rix, Stanley Burnton and Jackson LJJ) dismissed Mr and Mrs Rabone's appeal. The only substantive judgment was given by Jackson LJ (now reported at [2011] QB 1019). They agreed that there was no operational duty, but held that if there had been such a duty, the trust would have been in breach of it. This appeal raises a number of issues, but before I come to them, I need to set out the relevant facts.
  2. The facts
  3. Melanie Rabone was born in 1981. During 2000, she was diagnosed as suffering from depression and received medical treatment. There was some improvement in the next few years, although she had intermittent episodes of anxiety. On 4 March 2005, she tried to commit suicide by tying a pillow case round…
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Rabone & Anor v Pennine Care NHS Foundation and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2012] UKSC 2
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.