Southern Pallet Recycling Limited v Worksafe New Zealand
[2022] NZHC 1042
Citation 1
(Para 13)
…38 See, for example, R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 1 WLR 1837 at [13] per Dyson JSC for the majority; R v Babos 2014 SCC 16, [2014] 1 SCR 309 at [31], per Moldaver J for the majority; Fox v Attorney -General, above n 7, at [37]; Moti v The Queen [2011] HCA 50, (2011) 245 CLR 456 at [57] per French CJ, Gummow…
Higgs v The Queen
[2021] VSCA 301
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…decision of R v Maxwell [32] in support of his contention that executive misconduct during the appeal is a relevant consideration for the Court. [32][2010] UKSC 48.…
Wilson v R
[2015] NZSC 189
Citation 3
(Para 3)
…his context as being a departure from earlier cases of high authority and unjustified in an area involving fundamental values.[25] [21] R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 1 WLR 1837. [22] Warren v Attorney-General for Jersey [2011] UKPC 10, [2012] 1 AC 22. [23]See R v Maxwell , above n 21, at [33]–[38] per Dyson…
R v Antonievic
[2015] NZHC 1096
Citation 4
(Para 43)
…1 R v Antonievic [2013] NZCA 483, [2013] 3 NZLR 806 at [48]; Beckham v R [2012] NZCA 603, [2013] 1 NZLR 613 at [43]; R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 1 WLR 1837 at [13]; Warren v Attorney-General for Jersey [2011] UKPC 10, [2012] 1 AC 22 at [22]. 2 R v Antonievic [2012] NZHC 2686. 3 R v Antonievic [2013] NZCA 4…
R v Antonievic
[2013] NZCA 483
Citation 5
…22 These two categories of stay are apparent from R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 1 WLR 1837 at [13]; Warren v Attorney-General for Jersey [2011] UKPC 10, [2012] 1 AC 22 at [22]; and Beckham v R [2012] NZCA 603, [2013] 1 NZLR 613 at [43]. 23 Warren , above n 22, at [35] and [84]. 24 Moevao v Department of Labo…
Beckham v R
[2012] NZCA 603
Citation 6
(Para 9)
…sing Grant , stated that not every violation of legal professional privilege should result in a quashed conviction.[39] [37] Regina v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 1 WLR 1837. [38] At [28]. [39] At [96].…
R v Antonievic
[2012] NZHC 2686
Citation 7
…1 Moevao v Department of Labour [1980] 1 NZLR 464, at 482. 2 R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48, [2011] 1 WLR 1837; Warren v Attorney-General for Jersey [2011] UKPC 10, [2012] 1 AC 22; R v Grant [2005] EWCA Crim 1089, [2006] QB 60. 3 At 481–482, per Richardson J. 4 At 32, approving the writings of Professor Andrew Choo i…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Durham (deceased) & Ors (Trinidad and Tobago)
[2024] UKPC 21
Citation 8
…be viewed through the lens of abuse of process, there are two categories of abuse of process in criminal proceedings, as identified in R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48; [2011] 1 WLR 1837 (cited with approval in Warren v Attorney General for Jersey [2011] UKPC 10; [2012] 1 AC 22 (" Warren" ), para 21). Lord Dyson noted…
Warren & Ors v Attorney General of the Bailiwick of Jersey (Court of Appeal of Jersey)
[2011] UKPC 10
Citation 9
…es on the abuse of process jurisdiction in cases of prosecutorial misconduct were reviewed by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 48. That was a case about a decision by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales to order a retrial following the quashing of a conviction on the grounds…