NEW ZEALAND POLICE AND TANA ORMSBY-TURNER
[2025] NZCA 30
Citation 1
(Para 5)
…v Commissioner of Police, ex parte Blackburn [1968] 1 All ER 763; R v Chief Constable of Sussex [1999] 2 AC 418; R v Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] AC 756; Gill v Attorney-General [2010] NZCA 468, [2011] 1 NZLR 433; Fox v Attorney-General [2002] 3 NZLR 62 (CA); Polynesian Spa Ltd v Osborne [2005] NZA…
Lincoln v Attorney-General
[2023] NZHC 3822
Citation 2
(Para 32)
…s, ex parte Blackburn [1968] 2 QB 118 (CA). 15 At [48]; citing R (on the application of Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756 at [32]. 16 At [49].…
The Gama Foundation v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
[2023] NZHC 3098
Citation 3
(Para 31)
…nesian Spa Ltd v Osborne [2005] NZAR 408 (HC) at [62]; R (on the application of Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756 at [31]; Fox v Attorney General [2002] 3 NZLR 62 (CA) at [28]–[31]; and Matalulu v Director of Public Prosecutions (Fiji) [2004] NZAR 193 (F…
King v Attorney-General
[2022] NZHC 695
Citation 4
…rosecutions [2011] EWHC 1465 at [38], citing Lord Bingham of Cornhill in R (Corner House Research and another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756. 61 Moevao v Department of Labour , above n 57, at 471. 62 R v Humphrys , above n 57, at 527-528; 63 R v Anderson [2014] 2 R.C.S. at…
Te Waiti v The State of Western Australia
[2019] WADC 159
Citation 5
(Para 4)
…c Prosecutions is highly exceptional.[9] [9] See for example comments in R (Corner House Research and Another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60 [30] – [31] (Bingham LJ).…
Osborne v Worksafe New Zealand
[2017] NZCA 11
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…Polynesian Spa Ltd v Osborne , above n 19, at [62]; R (on the application of Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756 at [31]; Fox v Attorney-General , above n 19, at [28]–[31]; and Matalulu v Director of Public Prosecutions (Fiji) [2004] NZAR 193 (Fiji SC) at…
Osborne v Worksafe New Zealand
[2015] NZHC 2991
Citation 7
(Para 31)
…16 R (on the application of Corner House Research and Others) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60, [2009] 1 AC 756 at [31] (per Lord Bingham). 17 R v Anderson 2014 SCC 41, [2014] 2 SCR 167. 18 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 (HCA) at 534. 19 Hallett v Attorney-General (No 2) [1989] 2 NZLR…
In the matter of an application by Francis McGuigan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) No.3
[2021] UKSC 55
Citation 8
…The leading authority is the decision of the House of Lords in R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (JUSTICE intervening) [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] AC 756, paras 30-32. At the same time such a decision is not immune from judicial review, as the case law also confirms. Three recent example…
Friends of the Earth Ltd & Ors, R (on the application of) v Heathrow Airport Ltd
[2020] UKSC 52
Citation 9
…own of Eaton-under Heywood, with whom a majority of the Appellate Committee agreed); R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] 1 AC 756, para 40 (Lord Bingham of Cornhill, with whom a majority of the Appellate Committee agreed); and R (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcas…
Lord Carlile of Berriew QC, & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2014] UKSC 60
Citation 10
…House Research) v Direction of Serious Fraud Office (JUSTICE intervening) [2008] UKHL 60 [2009] 1 AC 756. It was acknowledged that in the Corner House case there was an express threat of action by a foreign government whereas here there is only fear of such action. But Stanley Burnton LJ felt that no material di…
McGuinness, Re Application for Judicial Review (No 2) (Northern Ireland)
[2020] UKSC 6
Citation 11
…mant’s husband if he assisted her to commit suicide) and R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (JUSTICE intervening) [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] AC 756 (“ Corner House Research ”) (judicial review challenge to the decision of the Director not to commence a prosecution against a potential def…
McQuillan, McGuigan and McKenna, Re Application for Judicial Review (Rev1)
[2021] UKSC 55
Citation 12
…that the new material publicised by the RTÉ documentary did not add to a significant extent to what was known already at the time of the previous investigation in 1978, and the many competing demands on police resources, a decision could rationally have been made not to undertake a further investigation. The dec…
SG & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (SSWP)
[2015] UKSC 16
Citation 13
…27. As was made clear in R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (JUSTICE Intervening) [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] AC 756, it is therefore inappropriate for the courts to purport to decide whether or not the Executive has correctly understood an unincorporated treaty obligation. As Lord Bingh…
Tigere, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills
[2015] UKSC 57
Citation 14
…n particular R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] AC 756, at para 41 (Lord Bingham), Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No 2) [2014] UKSC 39, [2014] AC 700, at paras 21 (Lord Sumption), 71, 93 (Lord Reed); R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC and ors) v Secretary of State for t…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Durham (deceased) & Ors (Trinidad and Tobago)
[2024] UKPC 21
Citation 15
…cutorial discretion overstates the position. As Lord Bingham of Cornhill stated in R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2008] UKHL 60; [2009] AC 756, 841, para 32, the discretions conferred on the DPP are not unfettered. Amongst other things, in exercising prosecutorial powers, a pros…