Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/243
Nandla and another (Appellants)
v.
Lee
and others (Respondents)
JUDGMENT
1
Die Jovis 24° Martii 1983
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Mandla and another against Lee
and
others, That the Committee had heard Counsel as well on
Monday
the 28th day of February last as on Tuesday the 1st
and Wednesday
the 2nd days of March last upon the Petition
and Appeal of Sewa
Singh Mandla and Gurinder Singh Mandla
both of 10 St. Caroline
Close, West Bromwich, West
Midlands praying that the matter of the
Order set forth in
the Schedule thereto, namely an Order of Her
Majesty's
Court of Appeal of the 29th day of July 1982, might
be
reviewed before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament and that the said Order might be reversed,
varied
or altered or that the Petitioners might have such
other relief in
the premises as to Her Majesty the Queen
in Her Court of
Parliament might seem meet; as also upon
the Case of A. G. Dowell
Lee and Park Grove Private School
Limited lodged in answer to the
said Appeal; and due
consideration had this day of what was
offered on either
side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual
and Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the
Queen assembled, That the said Order of Her
Majesty's
Court of Appeal of the 29th day of July 1982 complained
of
in the said Appeal be, and the same is hereby, Set Aside
save
for the words "all the 1st Defendant's costs of this
appeal
and all the Defendants' costs below (including the
costs of the
hearing of the 7th March 1980 to be taxed on
Scale 4 of the County
Court Scale) be taxed by a Taxing
Master and paid by the
Plaintiffs to the 1st Defendant
and/or the Solicitors for the
Defendants as appropriate",
and that it be Declared
that the Respondents committed an
act of unlawful discrimination
against the Appellants
within the meaning of the Race Relations
Act 1976: And it
is further Ordered, That the Appellants do
pay or cause to
be paid to the said Respondents the Costs incurred
by them
in respect of the said Appeal to this House, the amount
of
such last-mentioned Costs to be certified by the Clerk of
the
Parliaments if not agreed between the parties: And it
is also
further Ordered, That the Cause be, and the same
is hereby,
remitted back to the Birmingham County Court to
do therein as
shall be just and consistent with this
Judgment.
Cler; Parliamentor
HOUSE OF LORDS
MANDLA AND
ANOTHER
(APPELLANTS)
v.
LEE AND
OTHERS
(RESPONDENTS)
Lord
Fraser of Tullybelton
Lord Edmund-Davies
Lord Roskill
Lord
Brandon of Oakbrook
Lord Templeman
Lord Fraser of Tullybelton
my lords,
The main question in this appeal
is whether Sikhs are a " racial group "
for the purposes
of the Race Relations Act 1976 (" the 1976 Act").…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Mandla (Sewa Singh) v Dowell Lee and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [1982] UKHL 7
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.