Parliamentary
Archives,
HL/PO/JU/18/248
Hodgson (Respondent) v. Trapp and others (Appellants) and
Hodgson (a patient suing by her husband and next friend Keith
Elliot Hodgson) (Respondent) v. Trapp and others (Appellants)
(Petitions consolidated by order dated 21st November 1986) (On
Appeal from the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of
Justice)
JUDGMENT
Die Jovis 10° Novembris 1988
Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to
whom was
referred the Cause Hodgson against Trapp and others
and
Hodgson (a patient suing by her husband and next friend
Keith
Elliot Hodgson) against Trapp and others
(petitions
consolidated by order dated 21st November 1986) (On
Appeal
from the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of
Justice),
That the Committee had heard Counsel on Monday the
11th,
Tuesday the 12th and Monday the 18th days of July last,
upon
the Petition and Appeal of Maurice Alan Trapp and Stratford
on
Avon District Council, praying that the matter of the
Order
set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely an Order of
Mr.
Justice Taylor of the 8th day of May 1987, might be
reviewed
before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament
and
that the said Order might be reversed, varied or altered
or
that the Petitioners might have such other relief in
the
premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court
of
Parliament might seem meet; as upon the Case of Keith
Elliot
Hodgson and Christine Elizabeth Hodgson lodged in answer
to
the said appeal; and due consideration had this day of what
was
offered on either side in this Cause:
It is Ordered and Adjudged, by
the Lords Spiritual and
Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her
Majesty the Queen
assembled, That the said Order of Mr. Justice
Taylor of the
8th day of May 1987 complained of in the said Appeal
be, and
the same is hereby, Varied by reducing the quantum
of damages
and the interest payable thereon to the extent
indicated in
the penultimate paragraph of the speech of the Lord
Bridge of
Harwich and the concluding sentence of the speech of the
Lord
Oliver of Aylmerton: And it is further Ordered, That
the
Cause be, and the same is hereby, remitted back to the
Queen's
Bench Division of the High Court of Justice to do therein
as
shall be just and consistent with this Judgment.
Cler: Parliamentor:
Judgment: 10.11.88
HOUSE OF LORDS
HODGSON
(RESPONDENT)
v.
TRAPP AND
OTHERS
(APPELLANTS)
AND HODGSON
(A PATIENT SUING BY HER HUSBAND AND NEXT FRIEND
KEITH
ELLIOT HODGSON)
(RESPONDENT)
v.
TRAPP AND OTHERS
(APPELLANTS)
(PETITIONS
CONSOLIDATED BY ORDER DATED 21 NOVEMBER
1986)
(ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION OF THE
HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE)
Lord
Chancellor
Lord Bridge of Harwich
Lord Brandon of Oakbrook
Lord
Oliver of Aylmerton
Lord Goff of Chieveley
LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN
My Lords,
I have had the
advantage of reading in draft the speeches
to be delivered by my
noble and learned friends, Lord Bridge of
Harwich and Lord Oliver
of Aylmerton. I…
Continue reading Hodgson v Trapp
Sign in free to access the full text
- Case
- [1988] UKHL 9
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
AI summary not yet generated for this case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.