Hodgson v Trapp

Case [1988] UKHL 9


    Parliamentary Archives,
    HL/PO/JU/18/248

    Hodgson (Respondent) v. Trapp and others (Appellants) and

    Hodgson (a patient suing by her husband and next friend Keith

    Elliot Hodgson) (Respondent) v. Trapp and others (Appellants)

    (Petitions consolidated by order dated 21st November 1986) (On

    Appeal from the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of

    Justice)

    JUDGMENT

    Die Jovis 10° Novembris 1988

    Upon Report from the Appellate Committee to whom was
    referred the Cause Hodgson against Trapp and others and
    Hodgson (a patient suing by her husband and next friend Keith
    Elliot Hodgson) against Trapp and others (petitions
    consolidated by order dated 21st November 1986) (On Appeal
    from the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court of Justice),
    That the Committee had heard Counsel on Monday the 11th,
    Tuesday the 12th and Monday the 18th days of July last, upon
    the Petition and Appeal of Maurice Alan Trapp and Stratford on
    Avon District Council, praying that the matter of the Order
    set forth in the Schedule thereto, namely an Order of Mr.
    Justice Taylor of the 8th day of May 1987, might be reviewed
    before Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of Parliament and
    that the said Order might be reversed, varied or altered or
    that the Petitioners might have such other relief in the
    premises as to Her Majesty the Queen in Her Court of
    Parliament might seem meet; as upon the Case of Keith Elliot
    Hodgson and Christine Elizabeth Hodgson lodged in answer to
    the said appeal; and due consideration had this day of what
    was offered on either side in this Cause:

    It is Ordered and Adjudged, by the Lords Spiritual and
    Temporal in the Court of Parliament of Her Majesty the Queen
    assembled, That the said Order of Mr. Justice Taylor of the
    8th day of May 1987 complained of in the said Appeal be, and
    the same is hereby, Varied by reducing the quantum of damages
    and the interest payable thereon to the extent indicated in
    the penultimate paragraph of the speech of the Lord Bridge of
    Harwich and the concluding sentence of the speech of the Lord
    Oliver of Aylmerton: And it is further Ordered, That the
    Cause be, and the same is hereby, remitted back to the Queen's
    Bench Division of the High Court of Justice to do therein as
    shall be just and consistent with this Judgment.

    Cler: Parliamentor:

    Judgment: 10.11.88

    HOUSE OF LORDS

    HODGSON
    (RESPONDENT)

    v.

    TRAPP AND OTHERS
    (APPELLANTS)

    AND HODGSON

    (A PATIENT SUING BY HER HUSBAND AND NEXT FRIEND

    KEITH ELLIOT HODGSON)
    (RESPONDENT)

    v.

    TRAPP AND OTHERS

    (APPELLANTS)
    (PETITIONS CONSOLIDATED BY ORDER DATED 21 NOVEMBER

    1986)

    (ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION OF THE

    HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE)

    Lord Chancellor
    Lord Bridge of Harwich
    Lord Brandon of Oakbrook
    Lord Oliver of Aylmerton
    Lord Goff of Chieveley


    LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN

    My Lords,

    I have had the advantage of reading in draft the speeches
    to be delivered by my noble and learned friends, Lord Bridge of
    Harwich and Lord Oliver of Aylmerton. I…

Continue reading Hodgson v Trapp

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
Case
[1988] UKHL 9
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.