For a Court ready (fee required) version please follow this link
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND REGISTRY
CIV-2012-404-001701 [2013] NZHC 540
BETWEEN IAN WISHART Plaintiff
ANDCHRISTOPHER ROBERT MURRAY First Defendant
ANDKERRI MAREE MURRAY Second Defendant
ANDDIMENSION DATA NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
Third Defendant
Hearing: 25 October 2012
Appearances: Plaintiff in person
D M Salmon and D Nilsson for First and Second Defendants
H B Rennie QC for Third Defendants
Judgment: 19 March 2013
JUDGMENT OF COURTNEY J
This judgment was delivered by Justice Courtney on 19 March 2013 at 4:00 pm
pursuant to R 11.5 of the High Court Rules
Registrar / Deputy Registrar
Date………………………..
Solicitors: Lee Salmon Long, P O Box 2026 Shortland Street, Auckland 1140
Fax: (09) 912-7109 – D Salmon / D Nilsson – Email: david.salmon@lsl.co.nz daniel.nilsson@lsl.co.nz
Gibson Sheat, Private Bag 31905, Lower Hutt
Fax: (04) 569-1571
Counsel: H B Rennie QC, P O Box 10242 The Terrace, Wellington 6143
Fax: (04) 499-2705 – Email: hughrennie@legalchambers.co.nz
Copy to: I Wishart, P O Box 188, Kaukapakapa, Auckland 0843
Fax: (09) 420-4770 – Email: ian@investigatemagazine.com
WISHART V MURRAY & ORS HC AK CIV-2012-404-001701 [19 March 2013]
Introduction
[1] The deaths in 2006 of three-month-old twins, Chris and Cru Kahui from non- accidental injuries generated a significant level of public interest. The babies’ father, Chris Kahui, was acquitted of their murder. During the trial he suggested that the babies’ mother, Macsyna King, had inflicted the fatal injuries. Although a coroner later found that the twins had died while in Mr Kahui’s sole care, this suggestion retained some currency in the public arena.
[2] After the inquest, the plaintiff, Ian Wishart, wrote a book about the case called Breaking Silence. Ms King collaborated on it.1 When the book’s impending release became known in June 2011 the first defendant, Christopher Murray, established a Facebook page called “Boycott the Macsyna King Book”. Mr Murray used Twitter to publicise the Facebook page. He posted comments on Twitter and on the Facebook page criticising Mr Wishart and Ms King. The second defendant,
Kerri Murray (Christopher Murray’s wife) also posted comments on the Facebook page, as did other, unidentified people. In addition, Mr Murray made comments about Mr Wishart and Ms King during a radio interview.
[3] Mr Wishart has sued Mr and Mrs Murray and Mr Murray’s employer, Dimension Data NZ Ltd, alleging that many of the comments made via Twitter, on the Facebook page and during the radio interviews, defamed him. He is claiming a total of $8m. Mr and Mrs Murray have applied to strike out the statement of claim
either wholly or in part.2 The approach to be taken in determining strike out
applications is well settled.3 Only claims that are clearly untenable should be struck out. The fact that an application gives rise to difficult legal issues does not preclude striking out.
[4] The statements made by Mr and Mrs Murray are the subject of the first three causes of action and, in part, the fourth cause of action.…
Continue reading Wishart v Murray
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Wishart v Murray [2013] NZHC 540
- Case
- [2013] NZHC 540
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.