Rose v Rose

[2007] NZSC 100

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

SC 73/2007
[2007] NZSC 100

BETWEENJAMES ARTHUR ROSE

Appellant

ANDKAREN DIANE ROSE

Respondent

Court:Blanchard, Tipping and McGrath JJ

Counsel:C R Carruthers QC and M J Radich for Appellant

S Moran for Respondent

Judgment:6 December 2007 

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

A.The application for leave to appeal is granted.

B.The approved grounds of appeal are:

(1)Whether the appellant's interest in A W Rose & Sons is relationship property.

(2)Whether the relevant increase in value of Poplars is relationship property.

(3)Whether the relevant increase in value of Cloverlea is relationship property.

(4)Whether the dates at which real property and debt were valued were inappropriately inconsistent.

(5)(If necessary) Whether the award under section 17 was properly made.

Solicitors:
Radich Law, Blenheim for Appellant
Oakley Moran, Wellington for Respondent