For a Court ready (fee required) version please follow this link
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE
CIV-2018-485-903
[2019] NZHC 383
UNDER The Judicial Review Procedure Act 2016 BETWEEN
RAUKAWA SETTLEMENT TRUST
Applicant
AND
THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL
First Respondent
AND
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
Second Respondent
AND
WAIRARAPA MOANA KI POUAKANI INCORPORATED
Third Respondent
AND
RANGITĀNE TŪ MAI RĀ TRUST
Fourth Respondent
AND
NGĀTI KAHUNGUNU KI WAIRARAPA TAMAKI NUI-A-RUA SETTLEMENT
TRUST
Fifth Respondent
Hearing: 5 December 2018 and 4 and 12 February 2019 Appearances:
B J R Keith for Applicant
V Hardy and C Tyson for Second Respondent J Ferguson and N Milner for Third Respondent
R Siciliano (5 December 2018) and K Katipo (4 February 2019) for Fourth Respondent
Judgment:
12 February 2019
ORAL JUDGMENT OF GRICE J
RAUKAWA SETTLEMENT TRUST v THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHC 383 [12 February 2019]
Table of Contents
Para No. Introduction [1] Key sections [14] The decision [17] The issues [24] Background [26] The Settlement Act [26] Interpreting s 17 of the Settlement Act [42] Haronga decisions [60] Other matters raised [63] The claims [67] Natural justice [68] Conclusion [83] Orders [87] Costs [90]
Introduction
[1] The applicant (Raukawa) seeks judicial review of a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal dated 17 October 2018 (the decision).1 The decision withdrew Raukawa’s right to appear as an interested party in proceedings before the Tribunal.2
[2] The Tribunal’s proceedings relate to an application by the third respondent (Wairarapa Moana) for the resumption and return of land in Mangakino. The land is the site of the hydroelectricity generating Maraetai dam presently owned by Mercury New Zealand Ltd. That application is known as Wai 85.3
[3] The application for resumption follows procedures concerning Māori claims to state enterprise land set out in s 8 of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). For the purposes of these proceedings, state enterprise land is land formerly owned by a state-owned enterprise and carries an appropriate memorial on the title.
[4] Raukawa sought the right to be heard as an interested party based on its claim to mana whenua over the Mangakino land. Raukawa’s association with the land
1 Waitangi Tribunal Entitlement of Settled Parties to Participate (Wai 863 #2.590, 2018).
2 Waitangi Tribunal Directions of the Waitangi Tribunal (Wai 863 #2.534, 2018).
3 An application for remedies on behalf of the shareholders of the Wairarapa Moana ki Pouani Incorporation, Kingi Winiata Smillie (Wai 85). Waitangi Tribunal, above, n 1.
known as the Pouakani Block on the banks of the Waikato River is ancestral. That block was lost in the 1880s through failings by the Crown and in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi. In 1915, the Crown gifted 20,000 acres of the land (including the Mangakino land) to the Ngāti Kahunganui people (now shareholders in Wairarapa Moana) as compensation for land lost by them in the Wairarapa where they are traditionally from. They had no association with the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Raukawa Settlement Trust v Waitangi Tribunal and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] NZHC 383
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.