Raukawa Settlement Trust v Waitangi Tribunal

Link copied
Case Copied 35 min read

For a Court ready (fee required) version please follow this link

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON REGISTRY

I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA ROHE

CIV-2018-485-903

[2019] NZHC 383

UNDER The Judicial Review Procedure Act 2016

BETWEEN

RAUKAWA SETTLEMENT TRUST

Applicant

AND

THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL

First Respondent

AND

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL

Second Respondent

AND

WAIRARAPA MOANA KI POUAKANI INCORPORATED

Third Respondent

AND

RANGITĀNE TŪ MAI RĀ TRUST

Fourth Respondent

AND

NGĀTI KAHUNGUNU KI WAIRARAPA TAMAKI NUI-A-RUA SETTLEMENT

TRUST

Fifth Respondent

Hearing: 5 December 2018 and 4 and 12 February 2019

Appearances:

B J R Keith for Applicant

V Hardy and C Tyson for Second Respondent J Ferguson and N Milner for Third Respondent

R Siciliano (5 December 2018) and K Katipo (4 February 2019) for Fourth Respondent

Judgment:

12 February 2019


ORAL JUDGMENT OF GRICE J


RAUKAWA SETTLEMENT TRUST v THE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHC 383 [12 February 2019]

Table of Contents

Para No.
Introduction [1]
Key sections [14]
The decision [17]
The issues [24]
Background [26]
The Settlement Act [26]
Interpreting s 17 of the Settlement Act [42]
Haronga decisions [60]
Other matters raised [63]
The claims [67]
Natural justice [68]
Conclusion [83]
Orders [87]
Costs [90]

Introduction

[1]                 The applicant (Raukawa) seeks judicial review of a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal dated 17 October 2018 (the decision).1 The decision withdrew Raukawa’s right to appear as an interested party in proceedings before the Tribunal.2

[2]                 The Tribunal’s proceedings relate to an application by the third respondent (Wairarapa Moana) for the resumption and return of land in Mangakino. The land is the site of the hydroelectricity generating Maraetai dam presently owned by Mercury New Zealand Ltd. That application is known as Wai 85.3

[3]                 The application for resumption follows procedures concerning Māori claims to state enterprise land set out in s 8 of the Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). For the purposes of these proceedings, state enterprise land is land formerly owned by a state-owned enterprise and carries an appropriate memorial on the title.

[4]                 Raukawa sought the right to be heard as an interested party based on its claim to mana whenua over the Mangakino land. Raukawa’s association with the land


1      Waitangi Tribunal Entitlement of Settled Parties to Participate (Wai 863 #2.590, 2018).

2      Waitangi Tribunal Directions of the Waitangi Tribunal (Wai 863 #2.534, 2018).

3      An application for remedies on behalf of the shareholders of the Wairarapa Moana ki Pouani Incorporation, Kingi Winiata Smillie (Wai 85). Waitangi Tribunal, above, n 1.

known as the Pouakani Block on the banks of the Waikato River is ancestral. That block was lost in the 1880s through failings by the Crown and in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi. In 1915, the Crown gifted 20,000 acres of the land (including the Mangakino land) to the Ngāti Kahunganui people (now shareholders in Wairarapa Moana) as compensation for land lost by them in the Wairarapa where they are traditionally from. They had no association with the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Raukawa Settlement Trust v Waitangi Tribunal and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] NZHC 383
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Raukawa Settlement Trust sought judicial review of a decision by the Waitangi Tribunal to withdraw Raukawa's right to appear as an interested party in proceedings before the Tribunal. The proceedings related to an application by Wairarapa Moana for the resumption and return of land in Mangakino. Raukawa's claim of mana whenua over the Mangakino land is ancestral, and Raukawa's association with the land known as the Pouakani Block on the banks of the Waikato River is lost in the 1880s through failings by the Crown and in breach of the Treaty of Waitangi. Raukawa was initially granted the right to participate in the proceedings. It was subsequently withdrawn. The judicial review application before the Court seeks that the decision be quashed due to reviewable errors. The main question raised by the pleadings was whether the Tribunal misinterpreted s 17 of the Settlement Act to bar Raukawa from asserting an interest greater than a member of the public to be heard in relation to Wai 85 pursuant to s 8C of the 1975 Act. The Court found that the Tribunal misinterpreted s 17 of the Settlement Act. The Court quashed the decision and ordered the Tribunal to reconsider Raukawa's application under s 8C of the 1975 Act. The Court reserved the issue of costs noting the applicant's present stance. If counsel are unable to agree on costs, they are to file submissions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.