Carr v Gallaway Cook Allan

Link copied
Case Copied 64 min read

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND

AUCKLAND REGISTRY

CIV-2013-412-332

[2016] NZHC 2065

BETWEEN

EWAN ROBERT CARR

First Plaintiff

BROOKSIDE FARM TRUST LIMITED
Second Plaintiff

AND

GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN

Defendant

Hearing: 9 May - 1 June, 3 June, 10 June, 13-14 June 2016

Appearances:

F M R Cooke QC, P J Dale and S Cottrell for the Plaintiffs

M Ring QC, A Foote, C Shannon and D Hills for the Defendant

Judgment:

1 September 2016


JUDGMENT OF THOMAS J


This judgment was delivered by me on 1 September 2016 at 3.00 pm pursuant to Rule 11.5 of the High Court Rules.

Registrar/Deputy Registrar Date:………………………….

Solicitors:

GCA Lawyers, Christchurch. Duncan Cotterill, Christchurch.

CARR v GALLAWAY COOK ALLAN [2016] NZHC 2065 [1 September 2016]

Table of Contents

Introduction.......................................................................................................... [1]

Factual Background......................................................................................... [3]
The BSF Claim............................................................................................... [19]
Other claims.................................................................................................... [27]
This judgment................................................................................................ [33]

Part I – Water on BSF........................................................................................... [37]

Water Sources..................................................................................................... [39]

The Sowburn....................................................................................................... [40]

The Carr/Beattie water right............................................................................... [44]
Findings.......................................................................................................... [52]

The Maniototo.................................................................................................... [54]
The Community Water Agreement..................................................................... [59]

A Effect of the CWA....................................................................................... [68]
B Findings on status of the CWA................................................................... [71]

McSkimming land.............................................................................................. [74]
Findings.......................................................................................................... [80]

Expert evidence on water availability................................................................. [84]

Dr Davoren......................................................................................................... [85]

A Water requirements for BSF....................................................................... [89]
B The Sowburn............................................................................................... [91]
C The Taeiri................................................................................................... [96]
D Maniototo.................................................................................................... [97]

E Assessment.................................................................................................. [99]
F Maximum hectares.................................................................................... [105]

G Irrigation equipment................................................................................. [112]
Dr Heiler........................................................................................................... [114]

A SoilWorks/Greenwood report and parameters.......................................... [118]

B AusFarm modelling................................................................................... [120]
C Relationship of dry matter production to milk solids production             [127]
D Conclusion................................................................................................ [130]

Observations..................................................................................................... [132]
Mr Hamilton...................................................................................................... [138]
Dr Eger.............................................................................................................. [140]
Carr and others on water availability................................................................ [144]

A Mr Carr’s background evidence............................................................... [144]
B The Sowburn............................................................................................. [149]
C Water from the McSkimming land............................................................. [157]
D Milking Platform...................................................................................... [160]
E Production................................................................................................ [170]

Conclusion as to size of milking platform........................................................ [179]
Plaintiffs' submissions....................................................................................... [179]
Defence submissions......................................................................................... [185]

Analysis............................................................................................................. [189]

Part II Market value of BSF as at 31 May 2007........................................... [206]

What was the state of BSF in 2002 - 2008?...................................................... [207]
Findings........................................................................................................ [228]

Production levels 2002 onwards....................................................................... [230]
Mr Mills............................................................................................................. [235]

A Average Efficient Production.................................................................... [246]
B Productive valuation assessment.............................................................. [257]

Mr Crighton’s peer review of Mr Mills............................................................. [261]
Mr Larmer......................................................................................................... [268]
Mr Armstrong................................................................................................... [283]

Average efficient production of BSF in 2007................................................... [301]

Submissions.................................................................................................. [302]
Analysis........................................................................................................ [309]

The Fonterra forecast announcement................................................................ [318]

Tenders 2007..................................................................................................... [325]
Findings........................................................................................................ [343]

Stationview....................................................................................................... [347]
Findings........................................................................................................ [352]

Tenders 2008..................................................................................................... [356]

Findings........................................................................................................ [365]

Conclusion as to market value as at 31 May 2007........................................... [368]
Submissions.................................................................................................. [368]
Analysis and findings................................................................................... [371]

Value of BSF in late 2007/2008........................................................................ [396]
Fonterra announcements post 31 May 2007................................................ [397]
Submissions.................................................................................................. [405]
The law......................................................................................................... [415]
Analysis........................................................................................................ [422]

Value of BSF to Mr Carr................................................................................... [440]
Did Mr Carr have a preferential position in relation to water?  [441]
Findings........................................................................................................ [447]
Willowview.................................................................................................. [452]
Equity investors............................................................................................ [455]
Observations................................................................................................. [462]
Would Mr Carr have performed at least as well as his budget?                  [465]
Costs of production...................................................................................... [484]

Conclusion as to Mr Carr’s abilities.................................................................. [487]

Submissions.................................................................................................. [487]

Findings........................................................................................................ [492]

Mr Crighton on investment value..................................................................... [502]

Is investment value appropriate?....................................................................... [512]
Defence…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Carr v Gallaway Cook Allan and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] NZHC 2065
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Carr v Gallaway Cook Allan involved a failed property transaction in 2007, in which the defendant, Gallaway Cook Allan (GCA), represented the plaintiffs, Ewan Carr and Brookside Farm Trust Limited. The plaintiffs claimed damages of around $33 million from GCA for losses resulting from the failure of the transaction and subsequent events and litigation. The court determined the quantum of damages due to the plaintiffs and the types of losses to which they were entitled. The court assessed the value of the assets, considering evidence about water availability, the size of the milking platform, and Mr Carr’s skills. The court found that GCA had conceded liability and that the plaintiffs were entitled to damages for the difference between the agreed price and the market value of the assets. The court awarded damages for the loss of Big Sky Farm (BSF), other assets, costs incurred due to the failed transaction, and general damages for the impact on Mr Carr’s health and personal life. The court also considered the defendant’s counterclaim for misapplied funds and ordered interest to be paid on the damages awarded. The final order awarded the plaintiffs damages of approximately $10.7 million, subject to offsets for certain expenses and the defendant’s counterclaim.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.