Kyle Anthony v State of New South Wales
[2025] NSWSC 1322
Citation 1
…ings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
Litigation Fund WCX Pty Ltd v Aversa
[2025] NSWSC 1301
Citation 2
(Para 7)
…ings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
Barr v Macquarie University
[2025] NSWCATAD 267
Citation 3
(Para 63)
…al matters about which the applicant has no direct evidence: Xu v Sydney West Area Health Service [2006] NSWADT 3 at [16] citing Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1.…
LB v Secretary, NSW Department of Education (No 3)
[2025] NSWSC 940
Citation 4
…ings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
Paulson v State of New South Wales
[2025] NSWCA 181
Citation 5
(Para 22)
…It is well-established that orders for summary dismissal are interlocutory and require leave to appeal: see Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11; [1992] NSWCA 272 and McGinn v Cranbrook School [2016] NSWCA 226 at [9] and [20]. In the latter case, Gleeson JA (with whom Beazley P and Simpson JA agreed) referred…
McShelly Pty Ltd v VHS Holding Company Pty Ltd
[2025] QSC 159
Citation 6
(Para 7)
…) (2008) 252 ALR 41 at [19] (Finkelstein J); Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (No 2) (2000) 97 FCR 175 at [4]; Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 5-6 (Kirby P, as His Honour then was).…
Byrne v Turner Freeman Lawyers
[2025] NSWCA 146
Citation 7
…“[11] The order of Grove J was interlocutory. This Court decided that in Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 in dealing with the relevantly indistinguishable provisions of Part 13 of the then Supreme Court Rules, citing relevant decisions of the High Court and Privy Council: Hall v Nominal Defendant [1966] HCA 36;…
Gartrell v State of NSW (Public Guardian) & Live Better Services Pty Ltd
[2025] NSWCATAD 102
Citation 8
…uments or answers on cross examination may lead to the proof of factual matters about which the plaintiff has no direct evidence. (Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1). The commonly-stated test of `taking the evidence at its highest' needs to be understood in this context. The evidence that is available to a Tribun…
Resolution Life Australasia Limited v AMP Limited; Munich Reinsurance Company of Australasia Limited v AMP Limited
[2025] NSWCA 21
Citation 9
(Para 89)
…There is a further consideration in the present case. As Kirby P observed in Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 5-6; [1992] NSWCA 272, common experience teaches that it is usually more efficient and just to consider the viability of a cause of action when the facts said to support it are reduced and the suggest…
Byrne v Turner Freeman Lawyers and Casselden
[2025] NSWDC 5
Citation 10
(Para 3)
…e Notices of Motion, in ways which will become obvious below. I bear in mind the oft-quoted words of Kirby P (as he then was) in Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at pp 5 – 6: Common experience teaches that it is usually more efficient and just to consider the viability of a cause of action when the facts said to…
Perpetual Corporate Trust Limited v Tsiamoulis
[2024] NSWSC 1544
Citation 11
(Para 67)
…As stated by Kirby P in Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 at pp 5–6 (subsequently endorsed on appeal (High Court of Australia, Deane, Toohey and Gaudron JJ, 30 April 1993, unrep) and since cited with approval: see, for example, Bakewell v Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd [2019] NSWCA 199 at…
HNOE Limited v Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd
[2024] NSWCA 271
Citation 12
(Para 86)
…embark upon a consideration of the existence or otherwise of an action for breach of statutory duty was his view, by reference to Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 ( Wickstead ), that there was marginal utility in doing so because the proceedings would continue in any event because of the separ…
Ghosh v Scott Newtown trading as Shaw Gidley (No 10)
[2024] NSWSC 1170
Citation 13
…edings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
The Owners Strata Plan No. 82089 v Omaya Holding Pty Ltd
[2024] NSWSC 992
Citation 14
…ings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
Bhatia v State of New South Wales
[2024] NSWCA 190
Citation 15
(Para 9)
…arily dismissing the proceedings was an interlocutory order within the meaning of s 101(2)(e) of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW): Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11; [1992] NSWCA 272. Accordingly, leave to appeal was required. The notice of appeal and amended notice of appeal were therefore incompetent and…
Haigh v Haddad
[2024] NSWSC 904
Citation 16
(Para 49)
…The onus of demonstrating that proceedings are an abuse of process (and should be summarily dismissed) lies on the defendant: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11.…
GKX v Secretary, Department of Education
[2024] NSWCATAD 186
Citation 17
…uments or answers on cross examination may lead to the proof of factual matters about which the plaintiff has no direct evidence. (Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1). The commonly-stated test of `taking the evidence at its highest' needs to be understood in this context. The evidence that is available to a Tribun…
Bogovic v Aon Hewitt Financial Advice Limited
[2024] NSWSC 668
Citation 18
(Para 10)
…ds to be borne in mind that the identification of the date upon which a cause of action accrued is a question of fact, not law. In Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 (at 5-7), Kirby P, albeit in dissent, in the course of a characteristically clear and comprehensive summary of the applicable princ…
Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd v HNOE Limited
[2024] NSWSC 627
Citation 19
(Para 24)
…Kirby P observed in Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 5-7; [1992] NSWCA 272 that common experience teaches that it is usually more efficient and just to consider the viability of a cause of action when the facts said to support it are adduced and the suggested action can be judged with a full understanding of…
Mills v Dunpec Pty Ltd
[2024] NSWSC 340
Citation 20
(Para 21)
…the purpose of making findings of fact “where the material conflicts”, but to determine whether a triable issue is disclosed: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1, 9. Thirdly, as was made clear in Dey (at 91), “once it appears that there is a real question to be determined whether of fact or law and that the rights…
Fso v Secretary, Department of Education
[2024] NSWCATAD 82
Citation 21
…The appellant submitted that Wickstead anor v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 is authority for the proposition that on a strike out application the Tribunal must examine the evidentiary materials placed before it, not for the purpose of making findings of fact but to determine whether a triable issue is disclosed. However…
Business Finance Pty Ltd (in liq) v Casula Projects Pty Ltd
[2024] NSWSC 252
Citation 22
…edings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
Kitoko v Sydney Local Health District
[2024] NSWCA 49
Citation 23
(Para 106)
…ought). Mr Kitoko argues that in light of the burden the respondents have in establishing that there is no triable issue (citing Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 per Handley and Cripps JJA at 11), his actions should not be dismissed because of gaps in the case if the necessary evidence, including doctors’ record…
Ghosh v Scott Newton trading as Shaw Gidley (No 6)
[2023] NSWSC 1393
Citation 24
(Para 10)
…f Communities and Justice [2023] NSWCA 239 at [123]. Namely, that summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272. She also contended that Mfi A raised a triable issue about Mr Newton’s claimed breach of trust and so…
Transport for NSW v Boensch (No 2)
[2023] NSWSC 1354
Citation 25
…edings. Issues of fact are pre-eminently matters for final hearing. Summary dismissal will be refused if there is a triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
GR v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice
[2023] NSWCA 239
Citation 26
…WLR 597; [2017] NSWCA 206 The Age Company Limited v Liu (2013) 82 NSWLR 268; [2013] NSWCA 26 Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 Wishart v Fraser (1941) 64 CLR 470; [1941] HCA 8 ZZT v Public Guardian [2023] NSWCATAP 31 Texts Cited: Practice Note SC CL 3 Supreme Court Common Law Division – Administ…
Kitoko v Sydney Local Health District
[2023] NSWSC 898
Citation 27
…inging an application for summary dismissal, the Defendants undertake the burden of establishing that there is no triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11. The General Steel test remains the primary touchstone for such an application. The mere fact (if it be the case) that a plaintiff's prospects of…
Poche v Ellingworth
[2023] NSWSC 889
Citation 28
(Para 20)
…lear that even complex legal arguments can sometimes be advanced in an application for summary judgment. As an example, I refer to Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1.…
Clarke v GEO Australia Pty Limited
[2023] NSWSC 716
Citation 29
(Para 88)
…one defendant may be filled by the evidence to be called by the other defendant when the matter eventually goes to trial. [21] 20. Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272. 21. Moussa v Camden Council (2022) 162 ACSR 586 [2022] NSWSC 913 at [59] per Garling J.…
Dimitrovski v Boland
[2023] FCAFC 86
Citation 30
(Para 2)
…the UCPR, Part 13 r 13.4 which is in the following terms: … 11The order of Grove J was interlocutory. This Court decided that in Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 in dealing with the relevantly indistinguishable provisions of Part 13 of the then Supreme Court Rules , citing relevant decisions of the High Court an…
Ahern v Aon Risk Services Australia Limited
[2023] NSWCA 91
Citation 31
(Para 49)
…for the purposes of the question of whether leave to appeal is required under Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) , s 102(2)(e). [43] 43. Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11; [1992] NSWCA 272 (Handley Ja and Cripps JA, Kirby P (as his Honour then was) agreeing); Page v McKensey [2004] NSWCA 437 at [30] (Mason P, Hod…
Hadid v Sabouh
[2023] NSWSC 483
Citation 32
(Para 160)
…ere remains the possibility that a sham may be able to be proved from evidence of the respondents if they go into evidence: e.g. Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 at 11G-12C per Handley and Cripps JJA.…
Kelly v Commonwealth of Australia as represented by Services Australia (formerly the Department of Human Services)
[2023] FCA 69
Citation 33
…1) 82 CLR 497 Walter v Alltools Ltd (1944) 171 LT 371 Wenlock v Moloney [1965] 1 WLR 1238 Wickstead v Browne [1992] 30 NSWCA 272; (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 Williams & Humbert v W & H Trade Marks [1986] AC 368 Wotton v State of Queensland (No 5) [2016] FCA 1457; (2016) 157 ALD 14 Yaraka Holdings Holdings Pty Limited v Ante G…
Vasil v Boland
[2022] NSWSC 1534
Citation 34
…stralia (1992) 175 CLR 514; [1992] HCA 55 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598; [1993] HCA 57 Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 Texts Cited: JD Heydon and MJ Leeming, Jacobs’ Law of Trusts in Australia (8th ed, 2016, LexisNexis) Solicitors Manual (NSW) (LexisNexis) Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Susan Vasil (Plain…
Southey v Australian Press Council
[2022] NSWCATAD 348
Citation 35
…uments or answers on cross examination may lead to the proof of factual matters about which the plaintiff has no direct evidence. (Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1). The commonly-stated test of `taking the evidence at its highest' needs to be understood in this context. The evidence that is available to a Tribun…
Haigh v Department of Planning NSW
[2022] NSWSC 1434
Citation 36
(Para 43)
…bringing an application for summary dismissal, the defendant undertakes the burden of establishing that there is no triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11. The General Steel test remains the primary touchstone for such an application. The mere fact (if it be the case) that a plaintiff’s prospects…
Ejueyitsi v Thomas & Anor
[2022] NSWDC 490
Citation 37
…accepted the authorities and rulings of this court and the Supreme Court submitted by the plaintiff in particular on the cases of Wickstead v Brown (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Kirby J, Handley J and Cripps) which was unanimously upheld on appeal in the High Court under Justices Dean, Toohey and Gaudron that 6. Where th…
Choi v Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice
[2022] NSWCA 170
Citation 38
…ng an application for summary dismissal, the Defendants undertake the burden of establishing that there is no triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11. The General Steel test remains the primary touchstone for such an application. The mere fact (if it be the case) that a plaintiff’s prospects of suc…
Moussa v Camden Council (No.3)
[2022] NSWSC 913
Citation 39
(Para 45)
…not appropriate to entertain a summary dismissal application by the latter defendant, even when there is no clear case against it: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272.…
Singh v Charles
[2022] NSWSC 743
Citation 40
(Para 33)
…n does not depend upon evidence which may be made available by the landlords, there is no reason to refuse the relief sought: cf Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1.…
Marino (a pseudonym) v Bello (a pseudonym)
[2022] NSWCA 73
Citation 41
(Para 42)
…degree may arise, it is best that consideration of the development of the law take place by reference to facts as found: note Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 5–6 per Kirby P; Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; [2018] HCA 25, at [55] per curiam; Burton v Office of Director of Public Prosecutions (2019)…
Gardner v Selby
[2022] NSWSC 298
Citation 42
(Para 88)
…cts said to support it are adduced and the suggested action can be judged with a full understanding of all relevant evidence”: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 at 5 (Kirby P).…
Quach v Horvarth
[2022] NSWSC 248
Citation 43
(Para 25)
…and additional evidence is readily admissible on appeal having regard to the provisions of s 75A(7) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW): Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA). But the breadth of the subpoena directed to the Medical Council which is not a party to the proceedings is an obvious…
Pethybridge v Gillard
[2022] NSWSC 10
Citation 44
(Para 56)
…1 NSWLR 659 at 665. This is not for the purpose of making findings of fact, but to determine whether a triable issue is disclosed: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 9.…
Michael Wilson and Partners Ltd v Emmott
[2021] NSWCA 315
Citation 45
(Para 114)
…Receiving Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 698 at 704 [22] (Whitlam J); [1999] FCA 218; Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA; Kirby P agreeing); [1992] NSWCA 272. 105. Re Luck at 178 [6] (McHugh ACJ, Gummow and Heydon JJ).…
Willcocks v Croft
[2021] NSWSC 1610
Citation 46
(Para 12)
…bringing an application for summary dismissal, the defendants undertake the burden of establishing that there is no triable issue: Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (“ Wickstead ”).…
Singh v Khan
[2021] NSWCA 281
Citation 47
(Para 25)
…ing); Weatherall v Satellite Receiving Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd (1999) 30 ACSR 698 at 704 [22] (Whitlam J); [1999] FCA 218; Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1 at 11 (Handley and Cripps JJA; Kirby P agreeing); [1992] NSWCA 272.…
NR Addlestone Pty Ltd v Henry and Kogan
[2021] NSWSC 1410
Citation 48
…ge Service Pty Ltd (In liq) (1999) 12 BPR 22 175; [1999] NSWCA 435 Webster v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598; [1993] HCA 57 Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509; [1992] HCA 34 Category: Procedural rulings Parties: NR Addlestone Pty Ltd (Receivers and managers appoint…
Miraki v Griffith
[2021] NSWCA 263
Citation 49
(Para 130)
…proposition: Black v S Freedman & Co (1910) 12 CLR 105; [1910] HCA 58, Ilich v R (1987) 162 CLR 110; [1987] HCA 1 at [24], Wickstead v Browne (1992) 30 NSWLR 1; [1992] NSWCA 272 at 17E-F, and Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v European Bank Ltd (2004) 61 NSWLR 75; [2004] NSWCA 82 at [109]-[118].…
O'Donnell v Commonwealth of Australia
[2021] FCA 1223
Citation 50
…e Co. Limited (No 2) [2017] FCA 1260 Wickstead v Browne (1993) 10 Leg Rep SL 2 Wickstead v Browne [1992] NSWCA 272; 30 NSWLR 1 Wong v Silkfield Pty Ltd [1999] HCA 48; 199 CLR 255 WOTCH Inc v Vicforests (No 6) [2020] VSC 674 Division: General Division Registry Victoria National Practice Area: Commercial and Co…