Webb v Port Stephens Council

Case [2020] NSWCATAD 91


Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Webb v Port Stephens Council [2020] NSWCATAD 91
Hearing dates: 4 & 5 October 2018
Date of orders: 24 March 2020
Decision date: 24 March 2020
Jurisdiction:Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division
Before: D Dinnen, Senior Member
Decision:

(1)   The Tribunal affirms the Respondent’s reviewable decisions.

Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Freedom of information — Access to information – GIPA – LPP – open access information - sufficiency of searches – reasonable basis for belief - reasonableness of searches
Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997
Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009
Government Information (Public Access) Regulation 2009
Cases Cited: Amos v Central Coast Council [2018] NSWCATAD 101
Beesly v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 52
Camilleri v Commissioner of Police NSW Police Force [2012] NSWADT 5
Cianfrano v Director General Department of Commerce and anor (No 2) [2006] NSWADT 195
Hemeon v Commissioner of Police, New South Wales Police Service [2002] NSWADT 201
Hutchinson v Walcha Shire Council [2015] NSWCATAD 132
Miriani v Commissioner of New South Wales Police [2005] NSWADT 187
Public Service Assn v Premier’s Department [2002] NSWADT 277
Saggers v Environment Protection Authority [2014] NSWCATAD 37
Shepherd and Department of Housing, Local Government and Planning [1994] QICmr 7; (1994) 1 QAR 464
Robinson v Commissioner of Police [2014] NSWCATAP 73
Waterford v Commonwealth of Australia [1987] HCA 25; (1987) 163 CLR 54
Webb v Port Stephens Council [2017] NSWCATAD 348
Webb v Port Stephens Council [2018] NSWCATAP 224
Texts Cited: None cited
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Telina Webb (Applicant)
Port Stephens Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Solicitors:

  Applicant (Self represented)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/00119922 & 2018/00119930
Publication restriction: Paragraph 42

reasons for decision

Background

  1. This decision encompasses the Tribunal’s review of two separate applications made by Telina Webb (the Applicant) regarding determinations made by Port Stephens Council (the Respondent).

  2. By application filed 16 April 2018 the Applicant sought review of the Respondent’s determination dated 6 April 2018 under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (GIPA Act) for the production of documents relating to Development Application 483/2011 and Land and Environment Court proceedings 2012/10678 (Application 119922). The Respondent’s determination identified 9 documents falling within the scope of the application. Of those 9 documents:

  1. 2 documents were released to the Applicant in full;

  2. 1 document was released to the Applicant in part; and

  3. access was refused to the remaining 6 documents on the basis that there was an overriding public interest against disclosure.

  1. The Applicant also filed an additional application on 16 April 2018 seeking review of the Respondent’s determination dated 23 February 2018 under the GIPA Act for the production of documents relating to Code of Conduct Reports on four separate current and former employees of the Respondent (Application 119930). The Respondent’s determination identified 79 documents falling within the scope of the application. Of…

Continue reading Webb v Port Stephens Council

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Webb v Port Stephens Council [2020] NSWCATAD 91
Case
[2020] NSWCATAD 91
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Webb v Port Stephens Council involved the applicant seeking access to certain information held by the Council under the Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW). The applicant sought various documents relating to an investigation conducted by the Council into alleged misconduct by certain employees. The dispute was brought before the NSW Information and Privacy Commission, which is the statutory body responsible for overseeing public access to government information in New South Wales. The central issue before the Commission was whether the Council had conducted sufficient searches to locate the information requested by the applicant, and if the searches were conducted with reasonable diligence and in good faith.

The Commission had to determine if the searches performed by the Council were adequate in scope and depth to satisfy the requirements of the GIPA Act. This involved assessing whether the searches were conducted with a reasonable basis for belief that the information existed and whether the Council acted reasonably in its duty to locate and disclose the information. The applicant argued that the Council's searches were insufficient and not conducted in good faith, while the Council maintained that it had acted appropriately and in compliance with its obligations under the Act.

In its decision, the Commission found that the Council had undertaken reasonable searches for the information requested. It considered the nature and complexity of the information sought, the resources available to the Council, and the steps taken to locate the documents. The Commission concluded that the Council had a reasonable basis for its belief that the searches were sufficient and that it had acted in good faith. The Commission rejected the applicant's claims and affirmed the Council's reviewable decisions, finding that the searches were conducted in accordance with the requirements of the GIPA Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The Tribunal affirms the Respondent’s reviewable decisions.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.