Reported Decision:
(2005) Aust Torts Reports 81-818
Court of Appeal
CITATION: Waverley Council v Ferreira [2005] NSWCA 418
HEARING DATE(S): 18/11/05
JUDGMENT DATE:
1 December 2005JUDGMENT OF: Spigelman CJ at 1; Ipp JA at 2; Tobias JA at 109
DECISION: (1) The appeal is partially allowed (2) The verdict in favour of Mr Ferreira is set aside and in lieu thereof a verdict of $115,900 should be substituted (3) The Council should pay 75% of Mr Ferreira's costs of appeal.
CATCHWORDS: NEGLIGENCE - liability of Council as occupier - claim for mental trauma - death of child occurring in park managed by Council - discussion of factors set out in s 5B of Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) - Council's breaches of duty. - NEGLIGENCE - contributory negligence - whether child aged 12 could perceive the relevant risk - s 5R of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW). D
LEGISLATION CITED: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), ss 5B, 5G(1), 5R, 30, 32(1)
CASES CITED: Annetts v Australia Stations Pty Ltd (2002) 211 CLR 317
Consolidated Broken Hill Ltd v Edwards [2005] NSWCA 380
Cooke v Midland Great Western Railway of Ireland (1909) AC 229
Doubleday v Kelly [2005] NSWCA 151
Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Ltd v Ryan (2002) 211 CLR 540
Jones v Bartlett (2000) 205 CLR 166
Lynch v Nurdin (1841) 1 QB 29
Romeo v Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory (1998) 192 CLR 431
Thompson v Bankstown Municipal Council (1953) 87 CLR 619
Vairy v Wyong Shire Council [2005] HCA 62
Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [1954] 2 All ER 368
Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40PARTIES: Waverley Council (Appellant)
Rogelio Ferreira (Respondent)FILE NUMBER(S): CA 41171/04
COUNSEL: M Joseph SC/N Polin (Appellant)
L King SC/P Regattiera (Respondent)SOLICITORS: Phillips Fox (Appellant)
Collins & Thompson (Respondent)
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court
LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S): DC 5834/03
LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Garling DCJ
CA 41171/04
DC 5834/03Thursday, 1 December 2005SPIGELMAN CJ
IPP JA
TOBIAS JA
WAVERLEY COUNCIL v ROGELIO FERREIRA
Judgment
1 SPIGELMAN CJ: I agree with Ipp JA.
2 IPP JA:
The main issues on appeal
3 On 15 December 2000 Martin Ferreira, then aged 12 years, died when he fell to the ground through a skylight in the roof of a building situated in a park known as the Kimberley Reserve. The building had been opened in 1985. It was used as a part-time play centre and was known as the Community Centre. The Community Centre and the park were under the care, control and management of the appellant (“the Council”). The park was designed to attract children and was equipped with swings and other playground equipment. Children came to play there every day.
4 Martin was the son of the respondent (Mr Ferreira). Mr Ferreira sued the Council for damages for mental harm he suffered by reason of Martin’s death. Garling DCJ held that the Council had breached the duty of care it owed…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Waverley Council v Ferreira and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] NSWCA 418
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court of Appeal was required to determine whether the Council owed a duty of care to Mr Ferreira, and if so, whether it had breached that duty. Specifically, the Court considered the application of sections 5B and 5R of the *Civil Liability Act 2002* (NSW) in assessing the Council's liability, including whether the Council had failed to take reasonable precautions to prevent the harm, and whether Mr Ferreira's son, being 12 years old, could have perceived the risk of drowning in the pond.
The Court found that the Council, as the occupier of the park, owed a duty of care to persons using the park, including the deceased child. It determined that the Council had breached this duty by failing to take reasonable steps to mitigate the risk of drowning, such as installing adequate fencing around the pond. The Court also considered the issue of contributory negligence, finding that while the child may have been aware of the water, he could not have fully appreciated the specific risk of drowning in the circumstances. The Court ultimately found the Council to be 75% liable for the death.
The appeal was partially allowed. The original verdict in favour of Mr Ferreira was set aside, and a substituted verdict of $115,900 was ordered. The Council was also ordered to pay 75% of Mr Ferreira's costs of the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The appeal is partially allowed (2) The verdict in favour of Mr Ferreira is set aside and in lieu thereof a verdict of $115,900 should be substituted (3) The Council should pay 75% of Mr Ferreira's costs of appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.